Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/EBeamLithography: Difference between revisions
Line 374: | Line 374: | ||
Even though the electron beam diameter is only a few nm, the feature and pitch resolution in resist is limited by scattering of the electrons in the resist and substrate material. Forward scattering is scattering within the resist layer and it will have a broadening effect of the beam. The magnitude of this effect depends on acceleration voltage, resist composition and thickness of the resist layer. Back scattering is caused by electron-matter interaction in the substrate itself and electrons that are scattered back into the resist layer will provide a secondary (unwanted) exposure of the resist. The scattering distance is highly dependent on acceleration voltage and the substrate material. For a silicon substrate exposed at 100 kV the back scatter range is up to 30 µm and hence it is essential for many designs to account for this effect using PEC software. At DTU Nanolab we primarily use Beamer from GenISys for PEC. The PEC process will result in a dose modulated design file where the relative exposure dose has been modulated to ensure that all parts of the design receives a uniform dose regardless of whether a design feature is in a sparsely populated or a heavily populated area of the design. For more information on PEC and use of Beamer please refer to our dedicated [http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/EBeamLithography/BEAMER Beamer page.] | Even though the electron beam diameter is only a few nm, the feature and pitch resolution in resist is limited by scattering of the electrons in the resist and substrate material. Forward scattering is scattering within the resist layer and it will have a broadening effect of the beam. The magnitude of this effect depends on acceleration voltage, resist composition and thickness of the resist layer. Back scattering is caused by electron-matter interaction in the substrate itself and electrons that are scattered back into the resist layer will provide a secondary (unwanted) exposure of the resist. The scattering distance is highly dependent on acceleration voltage and the substrate material. For a silicon substrate exposed at 100 kV the back scatter range is up to 30 µm and hence it is essential for many designs to account for this effect using PEC software. At DTU Nanolab we primarily use Beamer from GenISys for PEC. The PEC process will result in a dose modulated design file where the relative exposure dose has been modulated to ensure that all parts of the design receives a uniform dose regardless of whether a design feature is in a sparsely populated or a heavily populated area of the design. For more information on PEC and use of Beamer please refer to our dedicated [http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/EBeamLithography/BEAMER Beamer page.] | ||
[[/BEAMER Beamer page.]] | [[/BEAMER|Beamer page.]] | ||
[[/Wire Bonder#Ball Wire Bonder K&S 4524|Ball Wire Bonder]] | [[/Wire Bonder#Ball Wire Bonder K&S 4524|Ball Wire Bonder]] |
Revision as of 09:28, 8 September 2022
Feedback to this page: click here
Introduction to E-beam lithography at DTU Nanolab
DTU Nanolab has two EBL exposure systems, a JEOL JBX-9500FSZ and a Raith eLINE Plus system. The two systems are very different and new users should consult the EBL team to dertermine which system is appropriate for a particular project or type of sample. The general specifications of the two tools are given in the table below and may serve as a guideline for choice of system to use, especially the pros and cons list at the end of the table.
For more information on the specific tools go to their respective pages; JEOL JBX-9500FSZ or Raith eLINE Plus.
Users can request training sessions on either of the two exposure systems by contacting e-beam@nanolab.dtu.dk. Please provide all relevant process information about your substrate/process in your inquiry.
Equipment | JEOL JBX-9500FSZ | Raith eLINE Plus | |
---|---|---|---|
Performance | Resolution | ~5 nm beam diameter, ~10 nm lines obtained in 50 nm thick resist (CSAR), 7 nm in HSQ | ~35 nm lines obtained in 180 nm thick resist (CSAR) |
Maximum writing area without stitching | 1mm x 1mm | 1mm x 1mm | |
Process parameter range | E-beam voltage | 100 kV | 1-30 kV |
Scanning speed | 100 MHz | 20 MHz | |
Min. electron beam size | 4 nm | 10 nm | |
Min. step size | 0.25 nm | 1 nm | |
Beam current range | 0.22 nA to 100 nA | 0.01 to 12 nA | |
Dose range | 0.001 - 100000µC/cm2 | ? | |
Samples | Batch size |
Wafer cassettes:
|
|
Substrate material allowed |
|
| |
General considerations | Pros |
|
|
Cons |
|
|
E-beam resists
Standard E-beam resists and process guidelines
DTU Nanolab offers a limited number of standard EBL resist for our users. Our standard resist and process guidelines are summarized below. CSAR (AR-P 6200.09) is installed on Spin coater Gamma E-beam & UV for easy spin coating of 2", 4" and 6" substrates. Other substrate sizes or resist have to be used in the Labspin 2/3 coating systems. The standard resist bottles are stored in the chemical cupboard in E-4.
Resist | Polarity | Manufacturer | Comments | Technical reports | Spin Coater | Thinner | Developer | Rinse | Remover | Process flows (in docx-format) |
CSAR AR-P 6200 | Positive | AllResist | Standard positive resist, very similar to ZEP520. | AR-P 6200 info | Gamma E-beam & UV or Labspin 2/3 | Anisole |
|
IPA |
|
Process Flow CSAR.docx Process Flow CSAR with ESPACER Process Flow CSAR with Al Process Flow LOR5A with CSAR |
Medusa AR-N 8200 | Negative | AllResist | Both e-beam and DUV sensitive resist. | AR-N 8200 info | Labspin 2/3 | AR 600-07 | AR 300-47:DIW (1:1) | DIW | BOE | |
AR-N 7500 | Negative | AllResist | Both e-beam, DUV and UV-sensitive resist. | AR-N 7500 info | Labspin 2/3 | PGMEA |
|
DIW |
|
Non-Standard E-beam resists
It is possible to obtain permission to user other resists at DTU Nanolab, users must however provide these resists and possibly developers themselves. A non-exhaustive list of user supplied EBL resist used at DTU Nanolab and some process guidelines can be found in the table below.
Resist | Polarity | Manufacturer | Comments | Technical reports | Spin Coater | Thinner | Developer | Rinse | Remover | Process flows (in docx-format) |
ZEP520A | Positive resist, contact Lithography if you plan to use this resist | ZEON | Positive resist | ZEP520A.pdf, ZEP520A spin curves on SSE Spinner | See table here | Anisole | ZED-N50/Hexyl Acetate,n-amyl acetate, oxylene. JJAP-51-06FC05.pdf, JVB001037.pdf | IPA | acetone/1165 | Process_Flow_ZEP.docx
|
Copolymer AR-P 617 | Positive | AllResist | Approved, not tested yet. Used for trilayer (PE-free) resist-stack or double-layer lift-off resist stack. Please contact Lithography for information. | AR_P617.pdf | See table here | PGME | AR 600-55, MIBK:IPA | acetone/1165 | Trilayer stack: Process_Flow_Trilayer_Ebeam_Resist.docx | |
mr EBL 6000.1 | Negative | MicroResist | Standard negative resist | mrEBL6000 processing Guidelines.pdf | See table here | Anisole | mr DEV | IPA | mr REM | Process_Flow_mrEBL6000.docx |
HSQ (XR-1541) | Negative | DOW Corning | Approved. Standard negative resist | HSQ Dow Corning, MSDS HSQ | See table here | TMAH, AZ400K:H2O | H2O | process flow HSQ | ||
AR-N 7520 | Negative | AllResist | Both e-beam, DUV and UV-sensitive resist. Currently being tested, contact Peixiong Shi for information. | AR-N7500-7520.pdf | See table here | PGMEA | AR 300-47, TMAH | H2O | ||
PMMA | Positive | AllResist | We have various types of PMMA in the cleanroom. Please contact Lithography for information. | See table here | Anisole | MIBK:IPA (1:3), IPA:H2O | IPA | acetone/1165/Pirahna |
| |
ZEP7000 | Positive | ZEON | Not approved. Low dose to clear, can be used for trilayer (PEC-free) resist-stack. Please contact Lithography for information. | ZEP7000.pdf | See table here | Anisole | ZED-500/Hexyl Acetate,n-amyl acetate, oxylene. | IPA | acetone/1165 | Trilayer stack: Process_Flow_Trilayer_Ebeam_Resist.docx |
User resist bottles in the cleanroom
We recommend all groups or users to have their own bottle of e-beam resist inside the cleanroom. Please follow the guidelines below.
- Find a blue-capped glass bottle in the cupboard next to office 055 in 346 (outside the cleanroom).
- Bring the bottle inside gowning; clean it thoroughly on the outside with water or alcohol
- Bring the bottle to a fumehood inside the cleanroom; clean the bottle and the lid thoroughly on the inside with the main solvent of your resist, i.e. for CSAR use anisole. If in doubt which solvent your e-beam resist contains, consult the MSDS of the resist found here.
- If you need to dilute the resist, find a measurement beaker and clean it thoroughly in same solvent as your own bottle. For CSAR, ZEP, mr EBL, and anisole-based PMMA, you can use the measurement beaker in the box inside the fumehood in E-4.
- Let the bottle dry in the fumehood.
- Bring the (main) bottle of resist to the fumehood. Carefully unscrew the lid of the resist bottle. If necessary, wipe the thread of the resist bottle before you pour resist into your own bottle; dried resists may sit on the thread and be transferred into your bottle (or worse into the large resist bottle) when pouring.
- Clean all bottles on the outside with acetone or IPA, let them fume off in the fumehood. Clean the measurement beaker as well.
- Find a label to your resist bottle; bottles without labels will be removed from the cleanroom.
- Write name, Lotnumber, group and date on your bottle.
When spin coating e-beam resist, you should use a pipette to transfer resist from your bottle to the substrate. If you pour the resist directly from your bottle, you will leave resist in the thread that will soon dry out and leave particles in the resist. The disposable pipettes need to be thoroughly cleaned with a N2 gun before use (app. 20 s). After some practice, you can obtain particle-free 4" wafers if bottle and pipette (and spin coater) are properly cleaned.
Keep your resist bottles in up-right position, do not tilt or shake them too much, this can spread particles from the sidewall into the resist.
Development
AR 600-546 and ZED N-50 developers are available in a semi automatic puddle developer Developer E-beam in E-4, mainly intended for development of AR-P 6200 and ZEP 520A. It has automatic recipes for puddle development cycles for 10, 30 and 60 seconds of either of the two developers, each finishing off with an IPA rinse and drying cycle. The system can handle chips, 2", 4" and 6" wafers.
Other resist have to be developed in the E-beam developer fumehood in E-4 in beakers. Please notice there are specific beaker sets for alkaline developers and for solvent based developers.
Proximity Error Correction (PEC)
Even though the electron beam diameter is only a few nm, the feature and pitch resolution in resist is limited by scattering of the electrons in the resist and substrate material. Forward scattering is scattering within the resist layer and it will have a broadening effect of the beam. The magnitude of this effect depends on acceleration voltage, resist composition and thickness of the resist layer. Back scattering is caused by electron-matter interaction in the substrate itself and electrons that are scattered back into the resist layer will provide a secondary (unwanted) exposure of the resist. The scattering distance is highly dependent on acceleration voltage and the substrate material. For a silicon substrate exposed at 100 kV the back scatter range is up to 30 µm and hence it is essential for many designs to account for this effect using PEC software. At DTU Nanolab we primarily use Beamer from GenISys for PEC. The PEC process will result in a dose modulated design file where the relative exposure dose has been modulated to ensure that all parts of the design receives a uniform dose regardless of whether a design feature is in a sparsely populated or a heavily populated area of the design. For more information on PEC and use of Beamer please refer to our dedicated Beamer page.
Proximity Error Correction (PEC) in BEAMER
BEAMER is endowed with a software that corrects for proximity errors in the e-beam exposure. You can read more about this function in the BEAMER manual here and in the BEAMER presentation here BEAMERPresentation.pdf.
The proximity error correction require a forward and a backward range parameter, alfa and beta, and a ratio of backscattered energy to the forward scattered energy, eta. As alfa depends on the electron acceleration voltage, which is constant at 100kV, alfa is in BEAMER fixed to 0.007. Help to find beta and eta can be found here.
Alternatively, a point-spread function can be used in BEAMER to calculate the optimised dose-variation.
Trilayer resist stack
As an alternative to PEC, a trilayer reists stack with a thin layer of thermally evaporated Ge can be used [1]. This reists stack has not yet been tested at DTU Nanolab. A process flow for this procedure can be found here Process_Flow_Trilayer_Ebeam_Resist.docx, but please contact Lithography before use.
Charging of non-conductive substrates
All substrates are grounded to the cassette when properly loaded. In a non-conducting substrate, the accumulation of charges in the substrates will however destroy the e-beam patterning. To avoid this, a charge dissipating layer is added on top of the e-beam resist; this will provide a conducting layer for the electrons to escape, while high-energy electrons will pass through the layer to expose the resist.
If you wish to investigate the charge dissipation using other methods than below, please contact Lithography.
ESPACER
Espacer is a chemical that works as a discharging layer; it is spun onto the wafer on top of the resist and easily rinsed off the wafer after e-beam exposure. Visit this page for more information: Espacer
Aluminum coating
At DTU Nanolab, we recommend to use a thin (20 nm) layer of thermally evaporated aluminum on top of the e-beam resist. Preferably, the thickness of Al and the e-beam dose should be optimised to the features you wish to e-beam pattern [2]. A good starting point is 20 nm Al; from here dose and development can be optimised to reach the resolution and feature size required.
The process flow for a standard e-beam exposure on CSAR with Al on top can be found here Process Flow CSAR with Al.
Literature on E-beam Lithography
- Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining, and Microfabrication, Volume 1: Microlithography, P. Rai-Choudhury (Editor), chapter 2 (p 139 – 250). Link to book can be found here: http://www.cnf.cornell.edu/cnf_spietoc.html
- Lithography, Wiley, 2011: Chapter 3, Electron Beam Lithography by Stefan Landis: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118557662.ch3/summary