Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/processA: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jmli (talk | contribs)
Jmli (talk | contribs)
Line 392: Line 392:
! PrA-0 <!-- step -->
! PrA-0 <!-- step -->
| 20      <!-- chiller temp -->
| 20      <!-- chiller temp -->
! 4      <!-- dep time -->
| 4      <!-- dep time -->
| 25      <!-- dep pressure -->
| 25      <!-- dep pressure -->
| 200      <!-- C4F8 flow -->
| 200      <!-- C4F8 flow -->
Line 403: Line 403:
| 140(1.5s) 45      <!-- platen power -->
| 140(1.5s) 45      <!-- platen power -->
| rowspan="2" |[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/showerheadchange/ProcessA | 1]]      <!-- link processes -->
| rowspan="2" |[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/showerheadchange/ProcessA | 1]]      <!-- link processes -->
| rowspan="2" |   <!-- keywords -->
| rowspan="2" | Step 2 original recipe  <!-- keywords -->
|-
|-
! PrA-1 <!-- step -->
| 20      <!-- chiller temp -->
! 3.5      <!-- dep time -->
| 25      <!-- dep pressure -->
| 200      <!-- C4F8 flow -->
| 2000      <!-- coil power -->
| 7.0      <!-- etch time -->
| 25(1.5s) 150      <!-- etch pressure -->
| 350(1.5s) 550      <!-- SF6 flow -->
| 5      <!-- O2 flow -->
| 2800      <!-- coil power -->
| 140(1.5s) 45      <!-- platen power -->
| rowspan="2" |[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/showerheadchange/ProcessA | 1]]      <!-- link processes -->
| rowspan="2" | Shorter dep cycle  <!-- keywords -->
|-
! PrA-2 <!-- step -->
| 20      <!-- chiller temp -->
| 4      <!-- dep time -->
| 25      <!-- dep pressure -->
! 150      <!-- C4F8 flow -->
| 2000      <!-- coil power -->
| 7.0      <!-- etch time -->
| 25(1.5s) 150      <!-- etch pressure -->
| 350(1.5s) 550      <!-- SF6 flow -->
| 5      <!-- O2 flow -->
| 2800      <!-- coil power -->
| 140(1.5s) 45      <!-- platen power -->
| rowspan="2" |[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/showerheadchange/ProcessA | 1]]      <!-- link processes -->
| rowspan="2" | Lower C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>8</sub> flow in dep cycle <!-- keywords -->
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 13:09, 14 June 2016

Feedback to this page: click here

Effects on Process A of showerhead change in December 2014

The effects of changing of the showerhead in December 2014 was investigated. Patterned wafers were processed before and after and the profile of the etched features were inspected in SEM. Click on the numbers in the 'Runs' column below to see the profiles.


Recipe Name Temp. Deposition step Etch step Comments
Time Pres. C4F8 SF6 O2 Coil Time Pres. C4F8 SF6 O2 Coil Platen Showerhead Runs Key words
Process A Step1 11 cyc 20 4 25 200 0 0 2000 7.0 25(1.5s) 90>>150 0 350(1.5s) 550 5 2800 120>>140(1.5s) 45 Old 1
Step2 44 cyc 4 25 200 0 0 2000 7.0 25(1.5s) 150 0 350(1.5s) 550 5 2800 140(1.5s) 45
Step1 11 cyc 20 4 25 200 0 0 2000 7.0 25(1.5s) 90>>150 0 350(1.5s) 550 5 2800 120>>140(1.5s) 45 New 1 Profile improved
Step2 44 cyc 4 25 200 0 0 2000 7.0 25(1.5s) 150 0 350(1.5s) 550 5 2800 140(1.5s) 45


Process A acceptance test

Process A is labelled Large trench (80μm wide) 150μm depth. In the acceptance test the process was run on a 150 mm SPTS wafer with 12-13 % etch load.

Process A specifications
Parameter Specification Average result
Etch rate (µm/min) > 15 18.9
Etched depth (µm) 150 189.1
Scallop size (nm) < 800 718
Profile (degs) 91 +/- 1 91.1
Selectivity to AZ photoresist > 150 310
Undercut (µm) <1.5 0.84
Uniformity (%) < 3.5 3.0
Repeatability (%) <4 0.43


Process A parameters
Step 1 Step 2
Parameter Etch Dep Etch Dep
Gas flow (sccm) SF6 350 (1.5 s) 550 C4F8 200 SF6 350 (1.5 s) 550 C4F8 200
Cycle time (secs) 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0
Pressure (mtorr) 25 (1.5 s) 90 >> 150 25 25 (1.5 s) 150 25
Coil power (W) 2800 2000 2800 2000
Platen power (W) 120 >> 140 (1.5) 45 0 140 (1.5) 45 0
Cycles 11 (keep fixed) 44 (vary this)
Common Temperature 20 degs, HBC 10 torr, Short funnel, with baffle & 5mm spacers

Quality control procedure

Quality Control (QC) for DRIE-Pegasus
QC Recipe: Process A
Step 1: 11 cycles Step 2: 44 cycles
QC limits DRIE-Pegasus
Etch rate in Si 21 - 28 µm/min
Non-uniformity 2  %

Process A guidelines

Process A is optimized for speed and depending on feature size and etch load it will achieve etch rates up to 25-30 µm/min.

This aggressive etch has a few drawbacks - one of which is the release of energy in the etch process. In general, it is clear that

  1. The higher the etch rate, the higher rate of released energy.
  2. The larger an area of silicon is exposed to plasma and hence etched, the higher rate of released energy.

Given its high etch rate, Process A is very sensible to high etch load processes and substrates with reduced cooling efficiency. Therefore, users are generally advised to

  1. Use Process A with precaution at high etch loads - above some 50%.
  2. Avoid using Process A on bonded wafers, in particular if the etch load is more than 5-10%. The bonding reduces the heat conduction across the wafer interface so the top wafer will immediately heat up and cause the mask to erode and the bonding polymer to melt.

If you have a bonded sandwich of wafers with very poor heat conduction (typically caused by intermediate polymer layers thicker than a few microns) you are advised to use other etch processes, maybe the deepetch on the ASE.

Process A performance

The perfomance of Process A has been investigated as a function of feature size and etch load.

Experiment

A number of wafers are patterned with the Travka mask set in AZ photoresist or 600 nm oxide. The wafers are then etched (batch recipe with 5 minute TDESC interstep cleans) using two different durations of process A in the DRIE-Pegasus.

Wafers
Wafer number Mask Mask material Process A duration
C01548.01 Travka 05 AZ photoresist 55 cycles, 10:05 mins
C01548.02 Travka 10 AZ photoresist 55 cycles, 10:05 mins
C01548.03 Travka 20 AZ photoresist 55 cycles, 10:05 mins
C01548.04 Travka 35 AZ photoresist 55 cycles, 10:05 mins
C01548.05 Travka 50 AZ photoresist 55 cycles, 10:05 mins
Wafers
Wafer number Mask Mask material Process A duration
C01549.01 Travka 05 600 nm oxide 110 cycles, 20:10 mins
C01549.02 Travka 10 600 nm oxide 110 cycles, 20:10 mins
C01549.03 Travka 20 600 nm oxide 110 cycles, 20:10 mins
C01549.04 Travka 35 600 nm oxide 110 cycles, 20:10 mins

Results: Optical images

The etching of silicon releases energy. This means that the faster the etch is, the more heat needs to be dissipated. The consequence is the same if a larger percentage of the wafer is etched. Process A is the fastest etch and as seen above, the exposed area plays an important role. As the exposed area increases the oxide mask erosion is more and more pronounced.

If a larger area is to be etched, the cooling must be made more efficient, either by lowering the platen temperature or with increasing the pressure of He on the backside of the wafer. This will be investigated soon.


Results: Etched depths in trenches of different widths


Process A variations May-June 2016

Process A may overpassivate producing grass. To investigate the results


Recipe Temp. Deposition step Etch step Comments
Time Pres. C4F8 Coil Time Pressure SF6 O2 Coil Platen Runs Key words
PrA-0 20 4 25 200 2000 7.0 25(1.5s) 150 350(1.5s) 550 5 2800 140(1.5s) 45 1 Step 2 original recipe
PrA-1 20 3.5 25 200 2000 7.0 25(1.5s) 150 350(1.5s) 550 5 2800 140(1.5s) 45 1 Shorter dep cycle
PrA-2 20 4 25 150 2000 7.0 25(1.5s) 150 350(1.5s) 550 5 2800 140(1.5s) 45 1 Lower C4F8 flow in dep cycle