Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/ICP Metal Etcher/Chromium/End point: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Bghe (talk | contribs)
Bghe (talk | contribs)
Line 26: Line 26:
File:S047676midt_cr_12.jpg
File:S047676midt_cr_12.jpg
File:S047676midt_cr_14.jpg
File:S047676midt_cr_14.jpg
-
</gallery>
</gallery>


Line 37: Line 36:
File:S047676edge_cr_11.jpg
File:S047676edge_cr_11.jpg
File:S047676edge_cr_12.jpg
File:S047676edge_cr_12.jpg
-
</gallery>
</gallery>



Revision as of 12:51, 18 February 2025

Feedback to this page': click here


THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Made by Berit bghe @ DTU Nanolab

Using the standard Cr etch recipe I was etching through 100 nm Cr on a 150 mm wafer it an etch load of 50%

I recorded the end point signal and tried three different stopping times to figure out when to stop the etch. I want to find out how I can use the end point signal to get the best etch result; Etch though - also in the small patterns without too much over etch.

I was looking at trenches with sizes ranging from 200 nm to 2 µm in width. The masking materials was negative DUV resist: NUV 2300-0.5 of approximately 500 nm. Here process flow can be seen here: File:Process_flow_for_test_wafers xx.pdf

Etched close to optimal

Middel of the wafer Close to wafer edge

Etched too long

Etched too short