Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy/Workspaces: Difference between revisions

Bghe (talk | contribs)
Bghe (talk | contribs)
Line 20: Line 20:
!Recommended mode
!Recommended mode
|Roughness measurement can be done in both Contact, Tapping and ScanAsyst mode. We recommend '''ScanAsyst mode''' because of less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use. However it also works fine in tapping mode.
|Roughness measurement can be done in both Contact, Tapping and ScanAsyst mode. We recommend '''ScanAsyst mode''' because of less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use. However it also works fine in tapping mode.
|For Topographic measurements with no steep/abrupt steps we also recommend '''ScanAsyst mode''' due to less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use.  
|For Topographic measurements with no steep/abrupt steps we also recommend '''ScanAsyst mode''' due to less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use. We also recommend '''Tapping mode''' because we experience less problems when the tip end is slightly broken.  
|For Steep/abrupt steps but no high aspect ratio structures we still recommend '''Tapping mode''' or '''ScanAsyst mode" .  
|For Steep/abrupt steps but no high aspect ratio structures we still recommend '''Tapping mode''' or '''ScanAsyst mode" .  
|For High aspect ratio measurements we recommend Tapping mode. There is not yet a ScanAsyst probe developed for high aspect ratio. Therefore we recommend '''Tapping mode'''.
|For High aspect ratio measurements we recommend Tapping mode. There is not yet a ScanAsyst probe developed for high aspect ratio. Therefore we recommend '''Tapping mode'''.