LabAdviser/314/Microscopy 314-307/SEM/Nova/Transmission Kikuchi diffraction: Difference between revisions
Appearance
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
== Determination of the temperature of formation of the first hole == | == Determination of the temperature of formation of the first hole == | ||
The holes in the film formed near non-preferentially oriented (non-PO) [110] and [100] grains and it was initially supposed that the decrease of non-PO indexed points from a temperature of 150°C could be considered as a signal of hole formation in the film, even if the holes were not yet visible in the map. However, the indexed point number criterion alone is not enough to evaluate the starting point of the dewetting, because the total number of indexed points is a convolution of | The holes in the film formed near non-preferentially oriented (non-PO) [110] and [100] grains and it was initially supposed that the decrease of non-PO indexed points from a temperature of 150°C could be considered as a signal of hole formation in the film, even if the holes were not yet visible in the map. However, the indexed point number criterion alone is not enough to evaluate the starting point of the dewetting, because the total number of indexed points is a convolution of i) points that were initially indexed, but became not indexed with temperature due to the dewetting of the material and ii) points that were initially not indexed, due to the relatively large value of step sized used, but which started to get indexed with temperature when the growing grains became bigger than the step size. | ||
i) points that were initially indexed, but became not indexed with temperature due to the dewetting of the material | |||
ii) points that were initially not indexed, due to the relatively large value of step sized used, but which started to get indexed with temperature when the growing grains became bigger than the step size. | |||
Therefore it has been necessary to | Therefore it has been necessary to find another reliable evaluation criterion to confirm the exact starting temperature of formation of the holes in the film. The new criterion used consisted in the evaluation of the quality of the Kikuchi patterns on the non-indexed areas of the map. Fig. 11a shows the IPFZ map acquired at 210°C: in this map there are several non-mapped (and therefore black) areas. Fig. 11b shows the Kikuchi pattern recorded from a dewetted area of the sample, while Fig. 11c shows the pattern from an area with very fine grains (in the range of 10-20 nm). The difference between those two patterns is evident. In c) the Kikuchi pattern is visible, but indexing was difficult due to the chosen step size and to the fact that the grain size was close to the physical resolution of the TKD technique; thus many patterns originated from grain boundaries were difficult to be indexed. In b) no pattern is instead visible, indicating lack of crystalline material, i.e. only the Si3N4 substrate was present at that position. | ||