Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy/Workspaces: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Bghe (talk | contribs)
Bghe (talk | contribs)
Line 32: Line 32:
'''TAP300Al-G''' for Tapping mode
'''TAP300Al-G''' for Tapping mode
|'''AR5T-NCH'''
|'''AR5T-NCH'''
'''FIB6'''
'''[http://www.brukerafmprobes.com/p-3679-fib6-400a.aspx FIB6-400A]'''
|-
|-



Revision as of 14:52, 22 October 2014

Feedback to this page: click here

What scanning mode, experiment/workspace and probe should I select

Roughness measurements Topographic measurements with no steep/abrupt steps Steep/abrupt steps but no high aspect ratio High aspect ratio measurements
Recommended mode Roughness measurement can be done in both Contact, Tapping and ScanAsyst mode. We recommend ScanAsyst mode because of less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use. For Topographic measurements with no steep/abrupt steps we also recommend ScanAsyst mode due to less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use. For Steep/abrupt steps but no high aspect ratio structures we still recommend ScanAsyst mode due to ease of use but it will scan slower than Tapping mode. For High aspect ratio measurements we recommend Tapping mode. There is not yet a ScanAsyst probe developed for high aspect ratio. Therefor we recommend Tapping mode.
Recommended probes ScanAsyst in air ScanAsyst in air ScanAsyst in air for ScanAsyst mode

TAP300Al-G for Tapping mode

AR5T-NCH

FIB6-400A

Recommended experiment/Workspace

ScanAsyst in air - roughness (<10nm)

ScanAsyst in air - standards

ScanAsyst in air - steep steps Tapping mode in air 300nm (for steps <~1µm)

Tappping mode in air 6µm (for steps >1~µm)