Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy/Workspaces: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black" | |-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black" | ||
! | !Recommended mode | ||
| | |Roughness measurement can be done in both Contact, Tapping and ScanAsyst mode. We recommend ScanAsyst because of less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use. | ||
| | |For Topographic measurements with no steep steps we also recommend ScanAsyst mode due to less chance of (non-uniform) deformation of the sample and less tip wear - and because of ease of use. | ||
| | |For Steep steps but no high aspect ratio structures we still recommend ScanAsyst but it will go slower than Tapping mode. | ||
| | |For High aspect ratio measurements we recommend Tapping mode. There is not yet a ScanAsyst probe developed for high aspect ratio. Therefor we recommend tapping mode. | ||
|- | |- | ||