Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/processA: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| {{table}} | |||
| align="center" | | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" align="center" style="width:500px" | |||
! rowspan="2" | QC Recipe: | |||
! colspan="4" |Process A | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="2" | Step 1 | |||
! colspan="2" | Step 2 | |||
|- | |||
! width="120" | Parameter | |||
! width="120" | Etch | |||
! width="120" | Dep | |||
! width="120" | Etch | |||
! width="120" | Dep | |||
|- | |||
! Gas flow (sccm) | |||
| SF<sub>6</sub> 350 (1.5 s) 550 | |||
| C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>8</sub> 200 | |||
| SF<sub>6</sub> 350 (1.5 s) 550 | |||
| C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>8</sub> 200 | |||
|- | |||
! Cycle time (secs) | |||
| 7.0 | |||
| 4.0 | |||
| 7.0 | |||
| 4.0 | |||
|- | |||
! Pressure (mtorr) | |||
| 25 (1.5 s) 90 >> 150 | |||
| 25 | |||
| 25 (1.5 s) 150 | |||
| 25 | |||
|- | |||
! Coil power (W) | |||
| 2800 | |||
| 2000 | |||
| 2800 | |||
| 2000 | |||
|- | |||
! Platen power (W) | |||
| 120 >> 140 (1.5) 45 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 140 (1.5) 45 | |||
| 0 | |||
|- | |||
! Cycles | |||
| colspan="2" | 11 (keep fixed) | |||
| colspan="2" | 44 (vary this) | |||
|- | |||
! Common | |||
| colspan="4" | Temperature 20 degs, HBC 10 torr, Short funnel, with baffle & 5mm spacers | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== Quality control procedure == | == Quality control procedure == |
Revision as of 10:22, 3 October 2014
Feedback to this page: click here
Process A
Process A is labelled Large trench (80μm wide) 150μm depth. In the acceptance test the process was run on a 150 mm SPTS wafer with 12-13 % etch load.
Parameter | Specification | Average result |
---|---|---|
Etch rate (µm/min) | > 15 | 18.9 |
Etched depth (µm) | 150 | 189.1 |
Scallop size (nm) | < 800 | 718 |
Profile (degs) | 91 +/- 1 | 91.1 |
Selectivity to AZ photoresist | > 150 | 310 |
Undercut (µm) | <1.5 | 0.84 |
Uniformity (%) | < 3.5 | 3.0 |
Repeatability (%) | <4 | 0.43 |
Quality control procedure
Process A guidelinesProcess A is optimized for speed and depending on feature size and etch load it will achieve etch rates up to 25-30 µm/min. This aggressive etch has a few drawbacks - one of which is the release of energy in the etch process. In general, it is clear that
Given its high etch rate, Process A is very sensible to high etch load processes and substrates with reduced cooling efficiency. Therefore, users are generally advised to
If you have a bonded sandwich of wafers with very poor heat conduction (typically caused by intermediate polymer layers thicker than a few microns) you are advised to use other etch processes, maybe the deepetch on the ASE. Process A performanceThe perfomance of Process A has been investigated as a function of feature size and etch load. ExperimentA number of wafers are patterned with the travka masks in AZ photoresist or 600 nm oxide. The wafers are then etched (batch recipe with 5 minute TDESC interstep cleans) using two different durations of process A in the DRIE-Pegasus.
Results: Optical images
The etching of silicon releases energy. This means that the faster the etch is, the more heat needs to be dissipated. The consequence is the same if a larger percentage of the wafer is etched. Process A is the fastest etch and as seen above, the exposed area plays an important role. As the exposed area increases the oxide mask erosion is more and more pronounced. If a larger area is to be etched, the cooling must be made more efficient, either by lowering the platen temperature or with increasing the pressure of He on the backside of the wafer. This will be investigated soon.
Results: Etched depths in trenches of different widths
|