Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/nLOF: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Taran (talk | contribs)
Taran (talk | contribs)
 
Line 25: Line 25:
*PEB time: 60 s
*PEB time: 60 s


The recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 seconds at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness. However, for less heat conductive substrates, such as glass, we recommend increasing the PEB time to 120s.
The manufacturer recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 seconds at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness.


===PEB baking time investigation===
===PEB baking time investigation===

Latest revision as of 11:22, 30 October 2026

The content on this page, including all images and pictures, was created by DTU Nanolab staff, unless otherwise stated.

Feedback to this page: click here

Resist description

AZ nLOF 2020 is a negative UV photoresist, suitable for lift-off processes.

Spin coating

Spin curves for AZ nLOF 2020 using a 30s spin-off, and a 60s@110°C softbake

Typical spin parameters:

  • Spin off: 30-60 s
  • Soft bake: 60 s @ 110°C


Post-exposure bake

Typical PEB parameters:

  • PEB temperature: 110°C
  • PEB time: 60 s

The manufacturer recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 seconds at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness.

PEB baking time investigation

While 60 s @ 110°C is adequate for Si substrates, less thermally conductive substrates (glass, III-V materials, chips bonded to carrier), have shown problems using the standard PEB recipe.
These problems were largely solved by increasing the PEB time to 120 s. Tests (on Aligner: Maskless 02) have shown that the lithographic performance of nLOF on Si is improved when using 120 s @ 110°C PEB (less stitching, less bias, more negative profile).

A small report on the tests can be found here: nLOF PEB time 2019.

Development

Development speed:

  • Puddle development in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF): ~4 µm/min

A 2 µm nLOF resist film is fully developed in ~30 s in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF). However, the development can be continued to 60 s in order to get a more negative resist profile (due to increased under-cut).

Solvent development

Cross-linking negative resists have the potential to be developed using organic solvents instead of the normally used alkaline aqueous solutions. A quick test of this was carried out by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, showing that nLOF 2020 could potentially be used for water-free lithography.

A small report on the test can be found here: nLOF solvent development 2024.