Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/nLOF: Difference between revisions
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*PEB temperature: 110°C | *PEB temperature: 110°C | ||
*PEB time: 60 s | *PEB time: 60 s | ||
The recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 seconds at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness. | The recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 seconds at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness. | ||
===PEB baking time investigation=== | ===PEB baking time investigation=== | ||
While 60 s @ 110°C is adequate for Si substrates, less thermally conductive substrates (glass, III-V materials, chips bonded to carrier), have shown problems using the standard PEB recipe.<br> | While 60 s @ 110°C is adequate for Si substrates, less thermally conductive substrates (glass, III-V materials, chips bonded to carrier), have shown problems using the standard PEB recipe.<br> | ||
These problems were largely solved by increasing the PEB time to 120 s. Tests (on Aligner: Maskless 02) have shown that the lithographic performance of nLOF on Si is improved when using 120 s @ 110°C PEB (less stitching, less bias, more negative profile). A small report on the tests can be found [[media:nLOF_PEBtime_2019.pdf|''' | These problems were largely solved by increasing the PEB time to 120 s. Tests (on Aligner: Maskless 02) have shown that the lithographic performance of nLOF on Si is improved when using 120 s @ 110°C PEB (less stitching, less bias, more negative profile). | ||
A small report on the tests can be found here: [[media:nLOF_PEBtime_2019.pdf|'''nLOF PEB time 2019''']]. | |||
==Development== | ==Development== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*Puddle development in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF): ~4 µm/min | *Puddle development in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF): ~4 µm/min | ||
A 2 µm nLOF resist film is fully developed in ~30 s in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF). However, the development can be continued to 60 s in order to get a more negative resist profile (due to increased under-cut). | |||
===Solvent development=== | |||
Cross-linking negative resists have the potential to be developed using organic solvents instead of the normally used alkaline aqueous solutions. A quick test of this was carried out by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, showing that nLOF 2020 could potentially be used for water-free lithography. | |||
A | A small report on the test can be found here: [[media:nLOF_solventdev_2024.pdf|'''nLOF solvent development 2024''']]. | ||