Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/nLOF: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jehem (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Taran (talk | contribs)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
*PEB time: 60 s
*PEB time: 60 s


The recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 seconds at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness.


The recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 s at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness.
===PEB baking time investigation===
 
While 60 s @ 110°C is adequate for Si substrates, less thermally conductive substrates (glass, III-V materials, chips bonded to carrier), have shown problems using the standard PEB recipe.<br>
These problems were largely solved by increasing the PEB time to 120 s. Tests (on Aligner: Maskless 02) have shown that the lithographic performance of nLOF on Si is improved when using 120 s @ 110°C PEB (less stitching, less bias, more negative profile).  


'''PEB baking time investigation:'''
A small report on the tests can be found here: [[media:nLOF_PEBtime_2019.pdf|'''nLOF PEB time 2019''']].
While 60 s @ 110°C is adequate for Si substrates, less thermally conductive substrates (glass, III-V materials, chips bonded to carrier), have shown problems using the standard PEB recipe.<br>
These problems were largely solved by increasing the PEB time to 120 s. Tests (on Aligner: Maskless 02) have shown that the lithographic performance of nLOF on Si is improved when using 120 s @ 110°C PEB (less stitching, less bias, more negative profile). A small report on the tests can be found [[media:nLOF_PEBtime_2019.pdf|'''here''']].


==Development==
==Development==
Line 37: Line 37:
*Puddle development in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF): ~4 µm/min
*Puddle development in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF): ~4 µm/min


A 2 µm nLOF resist film is fully developed in ~30 s in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF). However, the development can be continued to 60 s in order to get a more negative resist profile (due to increased under-cut).
===Solvent development===
Cross-linking negative resists have the potential to be developed using organic solvents instead of the normally used alkaline aqueous solutions. A quick test of this was carried out by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, showing that nLOF 2020 could potentially be used for water-free lithography.


A 2 µm nLOF resist film is fully developed in 20-30 s in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF). However, the development can be continued to 60 s in order to get a more negative resist profile (due to increased under-cut).
A small report on the test can be found here: [[media:nLOF_solventdev_2024.pdf|'''nLOF solvent development 2024''']].

Latest revision as of 09:13, 9 April 2025

This section, including all images and pictures, is created by DTU Nanolab staff unless otherwise stated.

Feedback to this page: click here

Resist description

AZ nLOF 2020 is a negative UV photoresist, suitable for lift-off processes.

Spin coating

Spin curves for AZ nLOF 2020 using a 30s spin-off, and a 60s@110°C softbake

Typical spin parameters:

  • Spin off: 30-60 s
  • Soft bake: 60 s @ 110°C


Post-exposure bake

Typical PEB parameters:

  • PEB temperature: 110°C
  • PEB time: 60 s

The recommended PEB for nLOF is 60 seconds at 110°C, regardless of resist film thickness.

PEB baking time investigation

While 60 s @ 110°C is adequate for Si substrates, less thermally conductive substrates (glass, III-V materials, chips bonded to carrier), have shown problems using the standard PEB recipe.
These problems were largely solved by increasing the PEB time to 120 s. Tests (on Aligner: Maskless 02) have shown that the lithographic performance of nLOF on Si is improved when using 120 s @ 110°C PEB (less stitching, less bias, more negative profile).

A small report on the tests can be found here: nLOF PEB time 2019.

Development

Development speed:

  • Puddle development in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF): ~4 µm/min

A 2 µm nLOF resist film is fully developed in ~30 s in 2.38% TMAH (AZ 726 MIF). However, the development can be continued to 60 s in order to get a more negative resist profile (due to increased under-cut).

Solvent development

Cross-linking negative resists have the potential to be developed using organic solvents instead of the normally used alkaline aqueous solutions. A quick test of this was carried out by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, showing that nLOF 2020 could potentially be used for water-free lithography.

A small report on the test can be found here: nLOF solvent development 2024.