Jump to content

User talk:Prakus

From LabAdviser
Revision as of 13:51, 19 February 2026 by Prakus (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= DTU Nanolab – Page Feedback & Technical Discussion = This discussion page is intended for structured technical feedback regarding content, clarity, process accuracy, and documentation quality. All comments should remain professional and data-driven. ---- == Purpose == This page supports: * Technical corrections * Process clarifications * Data validation * Parameter optimization suggestions * Documentation improvements This is not a general chat page....")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

DTU Nanolab – Page Feedback & Technical Discussion

This discussion page is intended for structured technical feedback regarding content, clarity, process accuracy, and documentation quality.

All comments should remain professional and data-driven.


Purpose

This page supports:

  • Technical corrections
  • Process clarifications
  • Data validation
  • Parameter optimization suggestions
  • Documentation improvements

This is not a general chat page.


How to Submit Feedback

1. Click Add topic 2. Use the structured template below 3. Sign your entry with: prakus (talk) 13:51, 19 February 2026 (CET)


Structured Feedback Template

== Topic Title ==

'''Tool / Process Area:'''
(e.g., Back-end Processing – Wire Bonding)

'''Page Section Referenced:'''
(Provide link or section title)

'''Observation:'''
(Brief factual description)

'''Technical Rationale:'''
(Why clarification/change is needed)

'''Proposed Action:'''
(Specific improvement)

'''Feedback Type:'''
[ ] Clarification  
[ ] Correction  
[ ] Improvement  
[ ] Standardization  

'''Community Position (optional):'''
* {{Support}}
* {{Neutral}}
* {{Oppose}}

~~~~

Open Technical Discussions

Example: Pull Test Interpretation

Tool / Process Area: Wire Bonding

Observation: Clarification needed regarding research vs production capability interpretation.

Status: Under Review


Implemented Improvements

Example: Acceptance Criterion Clarification

Resolution: Added explanation distinguishing fixed reliability threshold from dataset mean.

Implemented by: UserName Date: YYYY-MM-DD


Discussion Guidelines (DTU Standard)

  • Maintain objective, technical tone
  • Reference data or standards when applicable
  • Avoid rewriting entire sections without discussion
  • Keep comments concise and structured
  • Focus on documentation quality and process accuracy

Page Owner Response Format

'''Response (DTU Nanolab):'''
Thank you for the input. The suggestion has been reviewed.

'''Decision:'''
Implemented / Pending / Not Applicable

'''Rationale:'''
(Brief technical justification)

~~~~