Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/Pegasus-4/SiO2 Etch/Cr mask: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 265: Line 265:


<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 6 min etch, H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:215sccm O2:10sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 150W, coil power:1800W" perrow="6" widths="200px" heights="150px">
<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 6 min etch, H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:215sccm O2:10sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 150W, coil power:1800W" perrow="6" widths="200px" heights="150px">
File:C10102_03__05.jpg
 
File:C10102_03__03.jpg
File:C10102_03__01.jpg
File:C10102_03__01.jpg
File:C10102_03__20.jpg
 
File:C10102_03__18.jpg
File:C10102_03__16.jpg
</gallery>
</gallery>


<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 6 min etch, H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:205sccm O2:20sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 150W, coil power:1800W" perrow="6" widths="200px" heights="150px">
<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 6 min etch, H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:205sccm O2:20sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 150W, coil power:1800W" perrow="6" widths="200px" heights="150px">
File:C10110_04.jpg
 
File:C10110_06.jpg
File:C10110_08.jpg |pitch 800 nm <br> Top 461 nm <br> @edge 437 nm <br> bottom 402 nm <br> height 916 nm <br> height from edge 827 nm <br> Cr left 83.5 nm <br> selectivity 55.5
File:C10110_08.jpg |pitch 800 nm <br> Top 461 nm <br> @edge 437 nm <br> bottom 402 nm <br> height 916 nm <br> height from edge 827 nm <br> Cr left 83.5 nm <br> selectivity 55.5
File:C10110_10.jpg |156 nm/min
 
File:C10110_12.jpg
</gallery>
</gallery>


<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 6 min etch, H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:205sccm O2:20sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 100W, coil power:1200W" perrow="7" widths="200px" heights="150px">
<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 6 min etch, H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:205sccm O2:20sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 100W, coil power:1200W" perrow="7" widths="200px" heights="150px">
File:C10119_01.jpg
 
File:C10119_03.jpg
File:C10119_05.jpg |pitch 800 nm <br> Top 444 nm <br> bottom 374 nm <br> height 718 nm <br> Cr left 85 nm <br> selectivity 48
File:C10119_05.jpg |pitch 800 nm <br> Top 444 nm <br> bottom 374 nm <br> height 718 nm <br> Cr left 85 nm <br> selectivity 48
File:C10119_06.jpg
 
File:C10119_09.jpg
File:C10119_11.jpg
</gallery>
</gallery>


<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 14 min etch (PLEASE DO NOT REPEAT THIS LONG TIME), H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:205sccm O2:20sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 100W, coil power:1200W" perrow="7" widths="200px" heights="150px">
<gallery caption="SiO2 etch with Cr mask on wafer piece on Si carrier 14 min etch (PLEASE DO NOT REPEAT THIS LONG TIME), H2:0sccm, C4F8:13sccm He:205sccm O2:20sccm, Pressure:3.6mTorr; platen power 100W, coil power:1200W" perrow="7" widths="200px" heights="150px">
File:C10160_02.jpg
 
File:C10160_06.jpg
File:C10160_09.jpg
File:C10160_09.jpg
File:C10160_12.jpg
 
File:C10160_15.jpg
File:C10160_17.jpg
File:Contour Plot Y32 EM_02_30 blue to red.jpg| Etch on none patterned wafer, Uniformity: +- 6.4%
</gallery>
</gallery>



Revision as of 13:25, 3 November 2023

Feedback to this page: click here
Unless otherwise stated, all content in this section was done by Berit Herstrøm, DTU Nanolab

SiO2 trench etching with Cr mask

Start parameters, variations noted in the gallery headline Recipe name: no 10 with lower platen power
Coil Power [W] 2500
Platen Power [W] 200
Platen temperature [oC] 20
H2 flow [sccm] 25.6
C4F8 flow [sccm] 25.6
He flow [sccm] 448.7
Pressure Fully open APC valve (8-9 mTorr)
Electromagnetic coils (EM) 'outer coil' / 'inner coil' '2 A' / '30 A' (PLEASE DO NOT RUN WITH THESE SETTINGS FOR MORE THAN 6 MIN)
  • 100 nm Cr mask etched in ICP metal with 500nm DUV neg resist (NUV 2300-0.5) and 65 nm barc.

Results

Temporary conclusions on how the process parameters affect the results in this study: What process parameters affect the results?
  • Going from full wafer to small piece on Si carrier:
    • Seemed to give more sidewall passivation
  • Platen power: lowering the platen power gives
    • more sidewall passivation
    • lower etch rate
    • Less trenching
  • Removing the H2 gave:
    • less sidewall passivation
  • Adding O2 gave:
    • less sidewall passivation
  • Process pressure/total gasflow rate
    • Reducing total gasflow rate which reduced the pressur inside the chamber gave:
      • less sidewall passivation
      • Reduced the CD (Critical Dimensions)
  • Coil power: Reducing coil power
    • less CD loss
    • more sidewall passivation
  • Increasing process time:
    • less sidewall passivation
    • more sidewall bow
    • CD loss due to larger mask faceting
  • Sidewall passivation↑
    • Sample size↓
    • Platen power↓
    • Coil power↓
    • H2 flow↑
    • O2 flow↓
    • Total gas flow rate/pressure↑

Profile SEM images

Profile, top view at tilted SEM images