Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano11: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano11 click here]'''
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano11 click here]'''
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
<!--Checked for updates on 5/10-2020 - ok/jmli -->


== The nano1.1 recipe ==
== The nano1.1 recipe ==

Revision as of 07:30, 5 October 2020

Feedback to this page: click here

The nano1.1 recipe

Recipe nano1.1
Recipe Gas C4F8 38 sccm, SF6 52 sccm
Pressure 4 mTorr, Strike 3 secs @ 15 mTorr
Power 600 W CP, 50 W PP
Temperature 10 degs
Hardware 100 mm Spacers
Time 120 secs
Conditions Run ID 1815
Conditioning Sequence: Oxygen clean, MU tests, processes, no oxygen between runs
Mask 1dfhj10 nm zep etched down to 6dgh4 nm



Nominal trench line width ' 30 60 90 120 150 Avg Std
Etch rates nm/min 183 218 232 249 256 228 29
Sidewall angle degs 95 94 94 93 93 94 1
Cd loss nm/edge -2 -4 -16 -15 -27 -13 10
CD loss foot nm/edge -2 -4 -16 -15 3 -7 9
Bowing 36 40 49 48 40 42 6
Curvature -55 -50 -39 -39 -42 -45 7
zep nm/min 172

Comments

The lower coil power run may still be isotropic-looking either because of a lack of deposition in the process, or because the bias increases as the coil power is decreased, hence the wafer would have received a more phyisically-aggressive process. Lower temp, lower coil + lower platen may be worth a look.