Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/XPS/Processing/ALDSandwich1/3scanned: Difference between revisions
Appearance
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|* Ti metal gives asymmetric Ti2p peak shapes | |* Ti metal gives asymmetric Ti2p peak shapes | ||
|- | |||
|** TiO<sub>2</sub> has symmetric peak shapes and TiN has complex peak shape, involving satellite features. | |** TiO<sub>2</sub> has symmetric peak shapes and TiN has complex peak shape, involving satellite features. | ||
|- | |||
|*Ti2p peak has significantly split spin-orbit components (Δ<sub>metal</sub>=6.1 eV) | |*Ti2p peak has significantly split spin-orbit components (Δ<sub>metal</sub>=6.1 eV) | ||
|- | |||
|** Splitting Δ-value varies with chemical state (Δ<sub>nitride</sub>=6.0 eV,Δ<sub>oxide</sub>=5.7 eV). | |** Splitting Δ-value varies with chemical state (Δ<sub>nitride</sub>=6.0 eV,Δ<sub>oxide</sub>=5.7 eV). | ||
|- | |||
|** Typically FWHM for each spin-orbit component is the same, but for Ti2p the Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> component is much broader than the Ti2p<sub>3/2</sub> peak. | |** Typically FWHM for each spin-orbit component is the same, but for Ti2p the Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> component is much broader than the Ti2p<sub>3/2</sub> peak. | ||
|- | |||
|*** Consequently, Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> peak is much shorter than expected. | |*** Consequently, Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> peak is much shorter than expected. | ||
|- | |||
|*** Caused by Coster-Kronig effect. (Post-ionization, Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> is very short lived compared to Ti2p<sub>3/2</sub> state.) | |*** Caused by Coster-Kronig effect. (Post-ionization, Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> is very short lived compared to Ti2p<sub>3/2</sub> state.) | ||
|- | |||
|*** Causes difficulty in accurately peak fitting Ti2p region with multiple chemical states. | |*** Causes difficulty in accurately peak fitting Ti2p region with multiple chemical states. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||