Specific Process Knowledge/Thin film deposition/Deposition of Gold/Adhesion layers: Difference between revisions
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
From the cross section profile of the 2nm Au sample (Fig. 2a), it is clear that Au, when deposited directly on SiO2, in order to reduce the interface energy, forms a nanoparticle-like layer in contrast to a continuous film. The diameter of the nanoparticles is about 10 nm. The nanoparticle morphology is confirmed by AFM analysis (Fig. 2b). The RMS surface roughness was measured to be 2.4 nm. For comparison, the RMS roughness of the SiO2 substrate was 0.3 nm. When the thin-film nominal thickness is increased to 20 nm (20nm Au sample, Fig. 2c), the Au layer becomes continuous, but a certain degree of surface roughness is still present due to grain coalescence. The AFM image (Fig. 2d) shows an RMS surface roughness of 1.0 nm, which is significantly lower than the 2nm Au sample. | From the cross section profile of the 2nm Au sample (Fig. 2a), it is clear that Au, when deposited directly on SiO2, in order to reduce the interface energy, forms a nanoparticle-like layer in contrast to a continuous film. The diameter of the nanoparticles is about 10 nm. The nanoparticle morphology is confirmed by AFM analysis (Fig. 2b). The RMS surface roughness was measured to be 2.4 nm. For comparison, the RMS roughness of the SiO2 substrate was 0.3 nm. When the thin-film nominal thickness is increased to 20 nm (20nm Au sample, Fig. 2c), the Au layer becomes continuous, but a certain degree of surface roughness is still present due to grain coalescence. The AFM image (Fig. 2d) shows an RMS surface roughness of 1.0 nm, which is significantly lower than the 2nm Au sample. | ||
[[File:Picture1.png| | [[File:Picture1.png|300px|center|thumb|Fig. 2: TEM cross section images and 300x300 nm AFM images of the 2nm Au sample (a-b) and of the 20nm Au sample (c-d).]] | ||
From the TEM bright field cross section analysis of the 2nm Ti/2nm Au sample, it is observed that 2 nm of Ti forms a continuous layer below the Au layer (Fig. 3a). The Au layer is continuous over the Ti, indicating that Ti is responsible for an interface energy decrease, acting as an adhesive. The AFM analysis of the same sample confirmed the continuous structure, and an RMS surface roughness of 0.8 nm was measured (Fig. 3b). The 2nm Ti/20nm Au sample also shows a smoother film compared to the 20nm Au sample (Fig. 3c), and the AFM analysis shows an RMS surface roughness of 0.5 nm (Fig. 3d), very similar to the one of the Si substrate. | From the TEM bright field cross section analysis of the 2nm Ti/2nm Au sample, it is observed that 2 nm of Ti forms a continuous layer below the Au layer (Fig. 3a). The Au layer is continuous over the Ti, indicating that Ti is responsible for an interface energy decrease, acting as an adhesive. The AFM analysis of the same sample confirmed the continuous structure, and an RMS surface roughness of 0.8 nm was measured (Fig. 3b). The 2nm Ti/20nm Au sample also shows a smoother film compared to the 20nm Au sample (Fig. 3c), and the AFM analysis shows an RMS surface roughness of 0.5 nm (Fig. 3d), very similar to the one of the Si substrate. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
In contrast to the case with the Ti adhesion layer, TEM bright field analysis of the 2nm Cr/2nm Au sample shows a single continuous layer (Fig. 4a). The AFM RMS surface roughness is 1.2 nm (Fig. 4b). Increasing the nominal Au thickness to 20 nm for the 2nm Cr/20nm Au sample, the film still presented a single-layer morphology (Fig. 4c), while the RMS surface roughness decreased to 0.6 nm (Fig. 4d). | In contrast to the case with the Ti adhesion layer, TEM bright field analysis of the 2nm Cr/2nm Au sample shows a single continuous layer (Fig. 4a). The AFM RMS surface roughness is 1.2 nm (Fig. 4b). Increasing the nominal Au thickness to 20 nm for the 2nm Cr/20nm Au sample, the film still presented a single-layer morphology (Fig. 4c), while the RMS surface roughness decreased to 0.6 nm (Fig. 4d). | ||
<gallery widths=" | <gallery widths="300px" heights="300px" perrow="2" halign="center"> image:Picture5.png|Fig. 3: TEM cross section images and 300x300 nm AFM images of the 2nm Ti/2nm Au sample (a-b) and of the 2nm Ti/20nm Au sample (c-d). | ||
image:Picture7.png|Fig. 4: TEM cross section images and 300x300 nm AFM images of the 2nm Cr/2nm Au sample (a-b) and of the 2nm Cr/20nm Au sample (c-d). </gallery> | image:Picture7.png|Fig. 4: TEM cross section images and 300x300 nm AFM images of the 2nm Cr/2nm Au sample (a-b) and of the 2nm Cr/20nm Au sample (c-d). </gallery> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
worse electron scattering centers tahn Au because they have a lower atomic number. | worse electron scattering centers tahn Au because they have a lower atomic number. | ||
[[File:Picture8.png| | [[File:Picture8.png|300px|center|thumb|Fig. 7: TKD IPFZ maps of the growth direction and grain size distributions of the 2-Ti/20-Au sample (a-b) and of the 2-Cr/20-Au sample (c-d).]] | ||
The smaller grain size is attributed to an enhanced wetting of the deposited Au promoted by the adhesion layer. The enhanced wetting behaviour increases the number of nucleation sites compared to the pure Au film case, where Au is evaporated directly onto the SiO2 surface. This eventually leads to a much denser nucleation of the Au grains, which at the | The smaller grain size is attributed to an enhanced wetting of the deposited Au promoted by the adhesion layer. The enhanced wetting behaviour increases the number of nucleation sites compared to the pure Au film case, where Au is evaporated directly onto the SiO2 surface. This eventually leads to a much denser nucleation of the Au grains, which at the | ||