Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy/KPFM: Difference between revisions
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[File:KPFM workfunction Au Si Al.jpg|400px]] | [[File:KPFM workfunction Au Si Al.jpg|400px]] | ||
For reference I prefer using the gold as the two other materials form oxides and I think the uncertainty of the values are higher. | |||
But even for gold you can find several different values for the work function. Take a look at these references: [http://student.ndhu.edu.tw/~d9914102/Teaching/EM/Paper/data/The%20work%20function%20of%20the%20elements%20and%20its%20periodicity.pdf], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function#Work_functions_of_elements[11]]. The work function value range for gold seems to be from 5.10eV to 5.47eV. 5.10eV for poly crystaline gold and the higher values for |
Revision as of 09:35, 9 January 2018
Feedback to this page: click here
THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
KPFM (Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy) measurements can be done with this AFM Icon. It is best for mapping the surface potential on a sample with nanometer resolution but it can also be calibrated to give quantitative values.
Here I shortly explain how to calibrate to get work function values:
To get a quantitative value for the work function of a sample material you need to calibrate the AFM tip you are using. This is done by measuring a material with a known work function. We do not have a certified sample for this but we are using a sample that came with the system. it has some lines of Au-Si-Al right next to each other. The below image is from the Bruker application note: AN10-RevA1-PeakForce_KPFM-appNote.pdf
For reference I prefer using the gold as the two other materials form oxides and I think the uncertainty of the values are higher. But even for gold you can find several different values for the work function. Take a look at these references: [1], [11]. The work function value range for gold seems to be from 5.10eV to 5.47eV. 5.10eV for poly crystaline gold and the higher values for