Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/ICP Metal Etcher/silicon oxide/By BGHE: Difference between revisions
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
1:0:68 | 1:0:68 | ||
|<!--'''Etch rate in Si'''--> | |<!--'''Etch rate in Si'''--> | ||
|- | |||
|s007409 | |||
|<!-- '''Mask material''' --> 750nm KRF | |||
|<!-- '''Barc etch''' --> none | |||
|<!-- '''Coil power''' --> 800W | |||
|<!--'''Platen power'''--> 150W | |||
|<!--'''Pressure'''--> 2.5mTorr | |||
|<!--'''Flow rate C4F8'''--> 8sccm | |||
|<!--'''Flow rate H2'''--> 30sccm | |||
|<!--'''Flow rate Ar'''-->0 | |||
|<!--'''T'''--> 0 | |||
|<!--'''Process time'''--> 5min | |||
|<!--'''Comment'''--> Repeated Pexiongs recipe without barc etch and only 5 min's runs. It probably takes about 1 min to get through the barc. If you count that in then the etch rate and relectivity to resist is almost the same as for the first run. Effect: CD increase | |||
|<!--'''Results'''--> | |||
[[File:ICP metal s007409_06.jpg|100px|frameless]] [[File:ICP metal s007409_07.jpg|100px|frameless]] | |||
|<!--'''CD change (mask 55% trench) after s007467 is it <50% after barc etch'''<br> | |||
trench opening as a fraction of pitch--> | |||
47.4% (1µm pitch)<br> | |||
47.5% (2µm pitch)<br> | |||
50.0% (3µm pitch)<br> | |||
|<!--'''Profile angles'''--> | |||
86-89 | |||
|<!--'''Etch depth in SiO2'''--> | |||
280 nm (1µm pitch)<br> | |||
370 nm (2µm pitch)<br> | |||
|<!--'''Etch rate'''--> | |||
56 nm/min (1µm pitch)<br> | |||
74 nm/min (2µm pitch)<br> | |||
|<!--'''Etch depth in resist'''--> | |||
160nm | |||
|<!--'''Selectivity (resist:SiO2)'''--> | |||
1:1.8 (1µm pitch)<br> | |||
1:2.3 (2µm pitch)<br> | |||
|<!--'''Etch rate in Si'''--> | |||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 10:41, 2 June 2016
THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
I tried with two different gas regimes: CF4 and C4F8. I only made a few tests with CF4 since I got a very bad selectivity to the resist mask and I dicided to go for the C4F8 instead.
C4F8
I started out with a recipe developed by Peixiong called pxSiO2try9, look at his results here
Parameter | Mask material | Barc etch | Coil power | Platen power | Pressure | Flow rate C4F8 | Flow rate H2 | Flow rate Ar | T | Process time | Comment | Results | CD change (mask 55% trench) after s007467 is it <50% after barc etch trench opening as a fraction of pitch |
Profile angles | Etch depth in SiO2 | Etch rate | Etch depth in resist | Selectivity (resist:SiO2) | Etch rate in Si |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
s008684 | 880nm KRF | barc etch CF 50s | 1000W | 200W | 2.5mTorr | 13sccm | 30sccm | 0 | 0 | 1:30min | The layer in this case is 300nm Si3N4 |
35% (1µm pitch) |
83-88 |
>300nm/min (Si3N4) |
240nm |
~1:2 (Si3N4) |
? | ||
s006656 | 750nm KRF | none | 1000W | 150W | 2.5mTorr | 15sccm | 0sccm | 30sccm | 0 | 10min | Tried with C4F8/Ar instead of C4F8/H2 => much lower etch rate and bad selectivity to the resist. |
358 nm |
35.8 nm/min (2µm pitch) |
526nm |
1:0:68 |
||||
s007409 | 750nm KRF | none | 800W | 150W | 2.5mTorr | 8sccm | 30sccm | 0 | 0 | 5min | Repeated Pexiongs recipe without barc etch and only 5 min's runs. It probably takes about 1 min to get through the barc. If you count that in then the etch rate and relectivity to resist is almost the same as for the first run. Effect: CD increase |
47.4% (1µm pitch) |
86-89 |
280 nm (1µm pitch) |
56 nm/min (1µm pitch) |
160nm |
1:1.8 (1µm pitch) |
||
s006106 | 750nm KRF | Barc etch O2 75s | 800W | 150W | 2.5mTorr | 8sccm | 30sccm | 0 | 0 | 10min | From Peixiong |
60% |
79 |
1053 nm (center) |
105 nm/min |
280nm |
1:3:75 (2µm pitch) |
CF4
I stopped trying with CF4 because I got bad selectivty to the resist and decided to focus on the recipe with C4F8 instead.
Parameter/Wafer ID | s006687 | s006701 | s007258 | s007350 | s007352 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mask material | 750nm KRF | 750nm KRF | 750nm KRF | 750 nm KRF | 750nm KRF |
Barc etch | none | none | none | none | none |
Coil power | 800W | 800W | 800w | 800w | 800w |
Platen power | 100W | 100W | 100w | 60W | 30w |
Pressure | 4mTorr | 4mTorr | 4mTorr | 4mTorr | 4mTorr |
Flow rate CF4 | 20sccm | 25sccm | 30sccm | 30sccm | 30sccm |
Flow rate H2 | 20sccm | 15sccm | 10sccm | 10sccm | 10sccm |
T | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Process time | 10min | 10min | 2min30 | 2min30 | 3min30 |
Comment | Little resist left, Trenching | A little trenching | very little trenching in large lines - anti trenching in small lines | ||
Results | |||||
Etch depth in SiO2 | 374nm | 505nm | 578nm | 336nm | 235nm |
Etch rate | 37.4nm/min | 50.5nm/min | 231nm/min | 134.4nm/min | 88nm/min |
Etch depth in resist | 345nm | 633nm | 700nm | 405nm | 308nm |
Selectivity (resist:SiO2) | 1:1.1 | 1:0.80 | 1:0.83 | 1:0.83 | 1:0.76 |