Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/ICP Metal Etcher/silicon oxide: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Bghe (talk | contribs)
Bghe (talk | contribs)
Line 3: Line 3:
It is possible to etch SiO2 in the ICP metal etcher but it is not designed for it and the results are not fantastic. It is a challenge to get a good selectivity to resist (typically in the range of 1:1 or worse) and it is probably not possible to get a profile angle of 90 degrees. More likely about 75-85 degrees.
It is possible to etch SiO2 in the ICP metal etcher but it is not designed for it and the results are not fantastic. It is a challenge to get a good selectivity to resist (typically in the range of 1:1 or worse) and it is probably not possible to get a profile angle of 90 degrees. More likely about 75-85 degrees.


===Slow etch of SiO2 with resist as masking material - using a 6" carrier wafer with recess ===
==Slow etch of SiO2 with resist as masking material - using a 6" carrier wafer with recess ==
This recipe can be used for slow etching of SiO2 with resist as masking material. Here are some test results presented.
This recipe can be used for slow etching of SiO2 with resist as masking material. Here are some test results presented.



Revision as of 11:42, 25 April 2016

Feedback to this page: click here

It is possible to etch SiO2 in the ICP metal etcher but it is not designed for it and the results are not fantastic. It is a challenge to get a good selectivity to resist (typically in the range of 1:1 or worse) and it is probably not possible to get a profile angle of 90 degrees. More likely about 75-85 degrees.

Slow etch of SiO2 with resist as masking material - using a 6" carrier wafer with recess

This recipe can be used for slow etching of SiO2 with resist as masking material. Here are some test results presented.

Parameter Resist mask
Coil Power [W] 200
Platen Power [W] 25
Platen temperature [oC] 0
CF4 flow [sccm] 20
H2 flow [sccm] 10
Pressure [mTorr] 3


Results Test on wafer with 50% load (Travka 50), by BGHE @danchip 100% load on 100mm wafers with Barc and KRF (no mask)
Etch rate of thermal oxide 44.1 nm/min (50% etch load) (01-02-2014)
Selectivity to resist [:1] ~0.9 (SiO2:resist) ~1.25:1 (Barc:KRF)
Wafer uniformity (100mm) ±1.6% (01-02-2014)
Profile [o] Take a look at the images but be aware that the resist profile was not good to begin with.
Wafer uniformity map (click on the image to view a larger image)
Contour plot of the etch rate over the wafer, 9 points measured
SEM profile images
Etch rate in barc 50 nm/min (2014-09-09)
Etch rate in KRF resist 40 nm/min (2014-09-09)


SiO2 etch using DUV mask


SiO2 etch nLOF

Parameter Resist mask
Coil Power [W] 800
Platen Power [W] 100
Platen temperature [oC] 0
CF4 flow [sccm] 30
H2 flow [sccm] 10
Pressure [mTorr] 4


Results Test on wafer with 50% load (Travka 50), by BGHE @danchip
Etch rate of thermal oxide >110 nm/min (50% etch load) (09-03-2015)
Selectivity to resist [:1] <0.7:1 (SiO2:resist)
Wafer uniformity (100mm) Not known
Profile [o] Not known
Wafer uniformity map (click on the image to view a larger image) Not known
SEM profile images NONE
Etch rate in nLOF resist 1.6µm was removed after 10min
Comment After 10min etch the resist was gone and the etch depth as 1.145µm in the oxide