Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/FAQ/Masks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--Checked for updates on 3/2-2016 - ok/jmli --> | |||
'''Feedback to this page: | '''Feedback to this page: | ||
[mailto:plasma@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/FAQ/Masks click here]''' | [mailto:plasma@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/FAQ/Masks click here]''' | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 3 February 2016
Feedback to this page:
click here
- Question 1
- I remember you said that you don't like Al as masking material because it will get sputtered off (am I right?) - but what about ALD deposited aluminium oxide - it is, as far as I know, much harder and resistant than Al..?
- Answer 1
- We don't have experience with ALD deposited aluminium oxide as a mask, however for some ESC configurations we have seen evidence of sputtering of the alumina uniformity shield surrounding the wafer; this would lead me to believe that the ALD aluminium oxide could still sputter and cause contamination issues.
Source: Kerry Roberts, SPTS