Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/IBE⁄IBSD Ionfab 300/IBE magnetic stack etch: Difference between revisions
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
===Some SEM profile images of the etched stacks=== | ===Some SEM profile images of the etched stacks=== | ||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | {| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | ||
| | |||
[[image:IBE magnetic stack A19-13.jpg|300x300px|thumb|center|Magnetic stack of Ta/MnIr/NiFe/Ta/Tao/Ta/MnIr/NiFe/Ta etched with the optimal parameters shown above. Redeposition of etched material at photo resist. Profile ~78°]] | [[image:IBE magnetic stack A19-13.jpg|300x300px|thumb|center|Magnetic stack of Ta/MnIr/NiFe/Ta/Tao/Ta/MnIr/NiFe/Ta etched with the optimal parameters shown above. Redeposition of etched material at photo resist. Profile ~78°]] | ||
| | |||
[[image:IBE magnetic stack A16-13.jpg|300x300px|thumb|center|Etched magnetic stack with poor structure transfer, the parameters chosen was clearly not optimal. Chosen etch parameters result in severe footing]] | [[image:IBE magnetic stack A16-13.jpg|300x300px|thumb|center|Etched magnetic stack with poor structure transfer, the parameters chosen was clearly not optimal. Chosen etch parameters result in severe footing]] | ||
| | |||
[[image:IBE magnetic stack A3-13.jpg|300x300px|thumb|center|Etched magnetic stack with poor structure transfer, the parameters chosen was clearly not optimal. Chosen etch parameters result in severe trenching]] | [[image:IBE magnetic stack A3-13.jpg|300x300px|thumb|center|Etched magnetic stack with poor structure transfer, the parameters chosen was clearly not optimal. Chosen etch parameters result in severe trenching]] | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 08:03, 13 November 2012
Results of Design of Experiments optimization of magnetic stack etching
Process parameters
To find the optimal parameters, Design of Experiments was applied with the intervals shown on the figure below. The final optimized recipe is listed in the table.
Parameter | Ti etch acceptance | |
---|---|---|
Neutalizer current [mA] | 450 | |
RF Power [W] | 800 | |
Beam current [mA] | 400 | |
Beam voltage [V] | 500 | |
Beam accelerator voltage | 500 | |
Ar flow to neutralizer [sccm] | 5.0 | |
Ar flow to beam [sccm] | 10.0 | |
Rotation speed [rpm] | 20 | |
Stage angle [degrees] | 5 | |
Helium backside cooling [Torr] | 37.5 |
Some SEM profile images of the etched stacks
For a good pattern transfer with IBE a large amount of redeposition on the resist edge has been observed. To reduce this redeposition the best option seems to use a photoresist just thick enough for the wanted etch depth. An alternative is sidewall sputtering at low incident angle. However experiments has shown poor cleaning rate and for narrow structures low angles will give rise to shadowing effects.
Endpoint detection with SIMS
End point detection is achieved by SIMS, and the etch rate is approximately 25 Nm/min. Resist stripping can be hard due to burned resist, to remedy this try to lower the current. Changing the currect will chance the sidewall angle and new studies of etch profiles will be necessary. For help, discussion and further info please contact Kristian Hagsted Rasmussen.