Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/ICP Metal Etcher/Chromium/End point: Difference between revisions
Created page with "''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/ICP_Metal_Etcher/Chromium/End_point click here]''' =<span style="background:#FF2800">THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION</span>200px=" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=<span style="background:#FF2800">THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION</span>[[image:Under_construction.png|200px]]= | =<span style="background:#FF2800">THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION</span>[[image:Under_construction.png|200px]]= | ||
Made by | |||
=Using the standard Cr etch recipe I was etching through 100 nm Cr on a 150 mm wafer it an etch load of 50%= | |||
I recorded the end point signal and tried three different stopping times to figure out when to stop the etch. I want to find out how I can use the end point signal to get the best etch result; Etch though - also in the small patterns without too much over etch. | |||
I was looking at trenches with sizes ranging from 200 nm to 2 µm in width. The masking materials was negative DUV resist: NUV 2300-0.5 of approximately 500 nm. Here process flow can be seen here: [[:File:Process_flow_for_test_wafers xx.pdf]] | |||
