Surveys and statistics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<td> <b> Uploaded files </b> </td> | <td> <b> Uploaded files </b> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr align="center"> | |||
<td> October 6th 2010 </td> | |||
<td> 57234 </td> | |||
<td> 237 </td> | |||
<td> 4198 </td> | |||
<td> 215 </td> | |||
<td> 253 </td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr align="center"> | <tr align="center"> | ||
<td> August 9th 2010 </td> | <td> August 9th 2010 </td> | ||
Revision as of 22:24, 6 October 2010
Surveys
Overview of the scores for the cleanroom survey. Answers to comments from the individual survey can be found by clicking on the survey date. Danchip has an internal criteria of 3.8 or better being a satisfactory grade.
| Date | Average score | Individual categories | |||||
| Availability of equipment |
Performance of equipment |
Cleanroom Conditions |
Overall satisfaction with DTU Danchip |
Staff Helpfulness | Timely and Relevant information level |
||
| June 2010 Survey | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 3.8 |
| March 2010 Survey | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 3.9 |
| January 2010 Survey | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 4.0 |
LabAdviser statistics
Statistics for the use of LabAdviser is collected here on a quasi-regular basis to get an overview of how LabAdviser develops, both on a contents side (Edits, upoaded files and number of pages) and also on the user side (Page views and Users)
| Date | Key user parameters | Key content parameters | |||
| Page views | Users | Page edits | Legitimate pages | Uploaded files | |
| October 6th 2010 | 57234 | 237 | 4198 | 215 | 253 |
| August 9th 2010 | 52305 | 200 | 4113 | 215 | 253 |
| July 1st 2010 | 50259 | 195 | 4100 | 215 | 253 |
| June 1st 2010 | 47686 | 189 | 4084 | 215 | 252 |
| May 1st 2010 | 45013 | 177 | 4064 | 215 | 250 |
| April 6th 2010 | 42659 | 172 | 4047 | 215 | 250 |
| March 1st 2010 | 39405 | 155 | 4007 | 214 | 246 |
| Feb 16th 2010 | 38080 | 152 | 3966 | 211 | 241 |