Surveys and statistics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<td> <b> Timely and Relevant <br> information level </b> </td> | <td> <b> Timely and Relevant <br> information level </b> </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr align="center"> | |||
<td> [[March 2010 Survey]] </td> | |||
<td> 4.0 </td> | |||
<td> 3.8 </td> | |||
<td> 3.9 </td> | |||
<td> 3.9 </td> | |||
<td> 3.9 </td> | |||
<td> 4.7 </td> | |||
<td> 3.9 </td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr align="center"> | <tr align="center"> | ||
<td> [[January 2010 Survey]] </td> | <td> [[January 2010 Survey]] </td> |
Revision as of 15:28, 12 March 2010
Surveys
Overview of the scores for the cleanroom survey. Answers to comments from the individual survey can be found by clicking on the survey date. Danchip has an internal criteria of 3.8 or better being a satisfactory grade.
Date | Average score | Individual categories | |||||
Availability of equipment |
Performance of equipment |
Cleanroom Conditions |
Overall satisfaction with DTU Danchip |
Staff Helpfulness | Timely and Relevant information level |
||
March 2010 Survey | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 3.9 |
January 2010 Survey | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 4.0 |
LabAdviser statistics
Statistics for the use of LabAdviser is collected here on a quasi-regular basis to get an overview of how LabAdviser develops, both on a contents side (Edits, upoaded files and number of pages) and also on the user side (Page views and Users)
Date | Key user parameters | Key content parameters | |||
Page views | Users | Page edits | Legitimate pages | Uploaded files | |
March 1st 2010 | 39405 | 155 | 4007 | 214 | 246 |
Feb 16th 2010 | 38080 | 152 | 3966 | 211 | 241 |