Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/XPS/Processing/ALDSandwich1/3scanned: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
== The Ti2p peak == | == The Ti2p peak == | ||
The titanium Ti2p peak is notoriously difficult to fit. From [[Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/XPS/Processing/XPSknowledgeview |XPS Knowledge view]] we have: | The titanium Ti2p peak is notoriously difficult to fit. From [[Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/XPS/Processing/XPSknowledgeview |XPS Knowledge view]] we have: | ||
* Ti metal gives asymmetric Ti2p peak shapes | |||
** TiO<sub>2</sub> has symmetric peak shapes and TiN has complex peak shape, involving satellite features. | |||
*Ti2p peak has significantly split spin-orbit components (Δ<sub>metal</sub>=6.1 eV) | |||
** Splitting Δ-value varies with chemical state (Δ<sub>nitride</sub>=6.0 eV,Δ<sub>oxide</sub>=5.7 eV). | |||
** Typically FWHM for each spin-orbit component is the same, but for Ti2p the Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> component is much broader than the Ti2p<sub>3/2</sub> peak. | |||
*** Consequently, Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> peak is much shorter than expected. | |||
*** Caused by Coster-Kronig effect. (Post-ionization, Ti2p<sub>1/2</sub> is very short lived compared to Ti2p<sub>3/2</sub> state.) | |||
*** Causes difficulty in accurately peak fitting Ti2p region with multiple chemical states. | |||