Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/Profiler/Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test: Difference between revisions

Bghe (talk | contribs)
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Characterization/Profiler/Optical_Profiler_(Sensofar)_acceptance_test click here]'''  
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Characterization/Profiler/Optical_Profiler_(Sensofar)_acceptance_test click here]'''  




Line 5: Line 5:


The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by ST Instruments and Sensofar together with  
The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by ST Instruments and Sensofar together with  
Pernille V. Larsen@Danchip and Berit G. Herstrøm@Danchip.
Pernille V. Larsen@nanolab and Berit G. Herstrøm@nanolab.


==This Table shows an overview of the acceptance tests==
==This Table shows an overview of the acceptance tests==
Line 120: Line 120:
*Objective: Interferometric 50x DI
*Objective: Interferometric 50x DI
*Z scan: VSI
*Z scan: VSI
*Light souce: increased gain and contrast
*Light source: increased gain and contrast


==Results of acceptance test no. 4==
==Results of acceptance test no. 4==
Line 127: Line 127:
Measurement: Depth of pattern
Measurement: Depth of pattern


Standard profiler measurement:335nm
Standard profiler measurement:335 nm


Acceptance criteria:Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement (331.65nm-338.35nm) and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1%  
Acceptance criteria:Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement (331.65nm-338.35nm) and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1%  
Line 248: Line 248:


'''Settings:'''
'''Settings:'''
Two different setting were tried out, the second was the most succesful:
Two different setting were tried out, the second was the most successful:


Setting no. 1:
Setting no. 1:
Line 391: Line 391:
Acceptance criteria: Repeatability within 0.2%
Acceptance criteria: Repeatability within 0.2%


Note: Because the surface roughness of the sample was very low and the noise/vibration level too high we could not obtain the specified repeatibility.
Note: Because the surface roughness of the sample was very low and the noise/vibration level too high we could not obtain the specified repeatability.




Line 397: Line 397:
'''Result'''
'''Result'''
*The surface roughness (Ra) was 0.5nm
*The surface roughness (Ra) was 0.5nm
*The repeatebility over 10 measurements was 34%
*The repeatability over 10 measurements was 34%
*The maximum deviation in roughness was 0.2nm
*The maximum deviation in roughness was 0.2nm