Specific Process Knowledge/Thin film deposition/Deposition of Gold/Adhesion layers: Difference between revisions
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
Ti does not inter-diffuse with Au at room temperature, supported by the ''µ''4PP measurements which show that the electrical properties appear to be similar to pure Au thin-films. The formation of a stable Ti layer under the Au prevents diffusion of Au into the underlying substrate and improves the performance-time and temperature stability of the devices. The Ti-Au inter-diffusion starts at temperatures higher than 175°C. If the devices have to be used for prolonged time above this temperature, Pd and Pt diffusion barriers must be used. Comparative studies show a localized surface plasmon damping in plasmonic nanostructures due to the presence of a very thin adhesion layer, and overall better performances of Ti over Cr for the optical resonance of such nanostructures. | Ti does not inter-diffuse with Au at room temperature, supported by the ''µ''4PP measurements which show that the electrical properties appear to be similar to pure Au thin-films. The formation of a stable Ti layer under the Au prevents diffusion of Au into the underlying substrate and improves the performance-time and temperature stability of the devices. The Ti-Au inter-diffusion starts at temperatures higher than 175°C. If the devices have to be used for prolonged time above this temperature, Pd and Pt diffusion barriers must be used. Comparative studies show a localized surface plasmon damping in plasmonic nanostructures due to the presence of a very thin adhesion layer, and overall better performances of Ti over Cr for the optical resonance of such nanostructures. | ||
Therefore, if the choice is limited to metallic adhesion layers, Ti is preferred over Cr for nano-optics applications. A perhaps even better alternative is to use organosilane-based adhesion layers. Comparative measurements of Ti vs Mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS) and Cr vs Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) show overall better performances for the organosilane-based adhesion layers over the metallic ones. A considerable disadvantage of these molecular adhesion layers is their lack of compatibility with the lithographic and lift-off processes, which still play an important role in the fabrication of nanostructures. | Therefore, if the choice is limited to metallic adhesion layers, '''Ti is preferred over Cr for nano-optics applications'''. A perhaps even better alternative is to use organosilane-based adhesion layers. Comparative measurements of Ti vs Mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS) and Cr vs Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) show overall better performances for the organosilane-based adhesion layers over the metallic ones. A considerable disadvantage of these molecular adhesion layers is their lack of compatibility with the lithographic and lift-off processes, which still play an important role in the fabrication of nanostructures. | ||
== Nano-electronic devices == | == Nano-electronic devices == | ||