Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/XPS/Processing/Basics/3fitting: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php?title=Specific_Process_Knowledge/Characterization/XPS/Processing/Basics/3fitting click here]'''
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php?title=Specific_Process_Knowledge/Characterization/XPS/Processing/Basics/3fitting click here]'''
<!--Checked for updates on 5/10-2020 - ok/jmli -->
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
== Fitting the oxygen O1s core level ==
== Fitting the oxygen O1s core level ==



Revision as of 07:48, 5 October 2020

Feedback to this page: click here

Fitting the oxygen O1s core level

There is a few choices to make on the fitting of the O1s level. The level is an s-orbital and thus gives rise to a peak that is symmetric so any non-symmetric appearance must be caused several states of oxygen. The question is then to which states of oxygen they should be attributed. Below are shown the spectra of levels 0 (surface), 11 and 20.

Level 0 Level 11 Level 20

We can establish that

  • The main peak remains at fixed binding energy, and
  • There is a shoulder at higher binding energy