|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = DTU Nanolab – Page Feedback & Technical Discussion =
| |
|
| |
|
| This discussion page is intended for structured technical feedback
| |
| regarding content, clarity, process accuracy, and documentation quality.
| |
|
| |
| All comments should remain professional and data-driven.
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| == Purpose ==
| |
|
| |
| This page supports:
| |
|
| |
| * Technical corrections
| |
| * Process clarifications
| |
| * Data validation
| |
| * Parameter optimization suggestions
| |
| * Documentation improvements
| |
|
| |
| This is not a general chat page.
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| == How to Submit Feedback ==
| |
|
| |
| 1. Click '''Add topic'''
| |
| 2. Use the structured template below
| |
| 3. Sign your entry with: <code>[[User:Prakus|prakus]] ([[User talk:Prakus|talk]]) 13:51, 19 February 2026 (CET)</code>
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| == Structured Feedback Template ==
| |
|
| |
| <pre>
| |
| == Topic Title ==
| |
|
| |
| '''Tool / Process Area:'''
| |
| (e.g., Back-end Processing – Wire Bonding)
| |
|
| |
| '''Page Section Referenced:'''
| |
| (Provide link or section title)
| |
|
| |
| '''Observation:'''
| |
| (Brief factual description)
| |
|
| |
| '''Technical Rationale:'''
| |
| (Why clarification/change is needed)
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposed Action:'''
| |
| (Specific improvement)
| |
|
| |
| '''Feedback Type:'''
| |
| [ ] Clarification
| |
| [ ] Correction
| |
| [ ] Improvement
| |
| [ ] Standardization
| |
|
| |
| '''Community Position (optional):'''
| |
| * {{Support}}
| |
| * {{Neutral}}
| |
| * {{Oppose}}
| |
|
| |
| ~~~~
| |
| </pre>
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| == Open Technical Discussions ==
| |
| <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
| |
|
| |
| === Example: Pull Test Interpretation ===
| |
|
| |
| '''Tool / Process Area:''' Wire Bonding
| |
|
| |
| '''Observation:'''
| |
| Clarification needed regarding research vs production capability interpretation.
| |
|
| |
| '''Status:''' Under Review
| |
|
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| == Implemented Improvements ==
| |
| <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
| |
|
| |
| === Example: Acceptance Criterion Clarification ===
| |
|
| |
| '''Resolution:'''
| |
| Added explanation distinguishing fixed reliability threshold from dataset mean.
| |
|
| |
| '''Implemented by:''' UserName
| |
| '''Date:''' YYYY-MM-DD
| |
|
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| == Discussion Guidelines (DTU Standard) ==
| |
|
| |
| * Maintain objective, technical tone
| |
| * Reference data or standards when applicable
| |
| * Avoid rewriting entire sections without discussion
| |
| * Keep comments concise and structured
| |
| * Focus on documentation quality and process accuracy
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| == Page Owner Response Format ==
| |
|
| |
| <pre>
| |
| '''Response (DTU Nanolab):'''
| |
| Thank you for the input. The suggestion has been reviewed.
| |
|
| |
| '''Decision:'''
| |
| Implemented / Pending / Not Applicable
| |
|
| |
| '''Rationale:'''
| |
| (Brief technical justification)
| |
|
| |
| ~~~~
| |
| </pre>
| |
