Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(51 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" | '''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch click here]''' | ||
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli --> | |||
<!--Checked for updates on 5/10-2020 - ok/jmli --> | |||
== Development of continuous nanoetch == | |||
{{Template:Author-jmli1}} | |||
<!--Checked for updates on 2/02-2023 - ok/jmli --> | |||
The recipes below have been run on 2" wafers with 30/60/90/120/150 nm lines in zep resist. The wafers were crystalbonded to a 4" oxide carrier leaving only a very small fraction (much less than 1% ) of silicon to be etched. If you intend to etch most of the surface of the wafer to create very small posts or ridges (rather than holes or trenches) | |||
The most used one is the nano1.42 recipe - to access the results, click on the bold link in the bottom of the table. | |||
{| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;" | |||
!Recipe | !Recipe | ||
!nano1.0 | !nano1.0 | ||
Line 6: | Line 20: | ||
!nano1.3 | !nano1.3 | ||
!nano1.21 | !nano1.21 | ||
!nano1.4 | |||
!nano1.41 | |||
!nano1.42 | |||
!nano1.43 | |||
|- | |- | ||
!C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>8</sub> (sccm) | !C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>8</sub> (sccm) | ||
Line 12: | Line 30: | ||
|52 | |52 | ||
|52 | |52 | ||
|75 | |||
|75 | |||
|75 | |||
|75 | |||
|75 | |75 | ||
|- | |- | ||
!SF<sub>6</sub> (sccm) | !SF<sub>6</sub> (sccm) | ||
|38 | |||
|38 | |||
|38 | |||
|38 | |||
|38 | |38 | ||
|38 | |38 | ||
Line 22: | Line 48: | ||
|- | |- | ||
!O<sub>2</sub> (sccm) | !O<sub>2</sub> (sccm) | ||
|0 | |||
|0 | |||
|0 | |||
|0 | |||
|0 | |0 | ||
|0 | |0 | ||
Line 29: | Line 59: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Coil power (W) | ! Coil power (W) | ||
|800 ( | |800 (F) | ||
|600 ( | |600 (F) | ||
|800 ( | |800 (F) | ||
|600 ( | |600 (F) | ||
|800 ( | |800 (F) | ||
|800 (F) | |||
|800 (F) | |||
|800 (F) | |||
|800 (F) | |||
|- | |- | ||
!Platen power (W) | !Platen power (W) | ||
Line 41: | Line 75: | ||
|40 | |40 | ||
|50 | |50 | ||
|50 | |||
|75 | |||
|40 | |||
|30 | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Pressure (mtorr) | ! Pressure (mtorr) | ||
|4 | |||
|4 | |||
|4 | |||
|4 | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
Line 55: | Line 97: | ||
| -10 | | -10 | ||
| -10 | | -10 | ||
| -20 | |||
| -20 | |||
| -20 | |||
| -20 | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Process time (s) | ! Process time (s) | ||
|120 | |||
|120 | |||
|120 | |||
|120 | |||
|120 | |120 | ||
|120 | |120 | ||
Line 63: | Line 113: | ||
|120 | |120 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="10" align="center"| Etch rates (nm/min) | |||
! colspan=" | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Averages||295||228||299||235||183||183||166||160||148 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Std. Dev||36||29||37||20||9||9||9||8||6 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! colspan="10" align="center"| Zep etch rate (nm/min) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| || ||172||95||94||69||67||101||65||55 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! colspan="10" align="center"| Sidewall angle (degrees) | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Averages||93||94||92||94||91||91||90||90||90 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Std. Dev||1||1||0||1||0||0||1||0||0 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! colspan="10" align="center"| CD loss (nm pr edge) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Averages||-11||-13||-17||-10||-10||-10||-20||-13||-24 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Std. Dev||12||10||11||14||15||15||16||15||21 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! colspan="10" align="center"| Bowing (nm) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Averages||31||42||13||16||6||6||3||-3||0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | | Std. Dev||7||6||4||3||2||2||2||3||1 | ||
| | |- | ||
| | ! colspan="10" align="center"| Bottom curvature | ||
| | |- | ||
| | | Averages||-45||-45||-44||-43||-32||-32||-34||-32||-39 | ||
| | |- | ||
| Std. Dev||5||7||4||9||10||10||9||8||9 | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Images | ! Images | ||
Line 155: | Line 153: | ||
|[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano13|Images]] | |[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano13|Images]] | ||
|[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano121|Images]] | |[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano121|Images]] | ||
|[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano14|Images]] | |||
|[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano141|Images]] | |||
|'''[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano142|Images]]''' | |||
|[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano143|Images]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
*[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/ICP Metal Etcher/silicon/nano|Etch of nanostructures in silicon on the ICP Metal Etcher]] | |||
*[[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanoetch/nano142-pxnano2|Nanoetch contest: DRIE-Pegasus versus ASE (nano1.42 versus pxnano2)]] | |||
== Development of switched nanoetch process == | |||
On the basis of the pxnano2 recipe from the ASE we will try to make a similar Bosch process on the Pegasus. | |||
{| border="2" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1" style="text-align:center;" | |||
|+ '''Process parameters''' | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="2" width="100"| Recipe | |||
! rowspan="2" width="20"| Step | |||
! rowspan="2" width="20"| Temp. | |||
! colspan="6" | Deposition step | |||
! colspan="7" | Etch step | |||
! colspan="2" | Process observations | |||
|- | |||
! width="40" | Time | |||
! width="40" | Pressure | |||
! width="40" | C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>8</sub> | |||
! width="40" | SF<sub>6</sub> | |||
! width="40" | O<sub>2</sub> | |||
! width="40" | Coil | |||
! width="40" | Time | |||
! width="40" | [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/Parameters| Pressure]] | |||
! width="40" | C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>8</sub> | |||
! width="40" | SF<sub>6</sub> | |||
! width="40" | O<sub>2</sub> | |||
! width="40" | Coil | |||
! width="40" | Platen | |||
! width="40" | [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/Parameters| Hardware]] | |||
! width="40" | Runs | |||
|- | |||
! nanobosch6 | |||
| A | |||
| 20 | |||
| 2.5 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 500 | |||
| 5.0 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 40 | |||
| 60 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 350 | |||
| 30 | |||
| LF+B100 | |||
| [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanobosch/nanobosch6 | Click]] | |||
|- | |||
! nb-1.0 | |||
| A | |||
| 20 | |||
| 2.5 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 500 | |||
| 5.0 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 350 | |||
| 30 | |||
| LF+B100 | |||
| [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanobosch/nb-1.0 | Click]] | |||
|- | |||
! nb-1.1 | |||
| A | |||
| 20 | |||
| 2.5 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 500 | |||
| 5.0 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 350 | |||
! 50 | |||
| LF+B100 | |||
| [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanobosch/nb-1.1 | Click]] | |||
|- | |||
! nb-1.2 | |||
| A | |||
| 20 | |||
| 2.5 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 500 | |||
| 5.0 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 5 | |||
! 500 | |||
| 50 | |||
| LF+B100 | |||
| [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanobosch/nb-1.2 | Click]] | |||
|- | |||
! barcstrip | |||
| A | |||
| 20 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 30 | |||
| 4 (3@15) | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 40 | |||
! 200 | |||
| 20 | |||
| LF+B100 | |||
| [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanobosch/barcstrip | Click]] | |||
|- | |||
! nanobosch7 | |||
| A | |||
| 20 | |||
| 2.5 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| 500 | |||
| 5.0 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 40 | |||
| 60 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 350 | |||
| 30 | |||
| LF+B100 | |||
| [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanobosch/nanobosch7 | Click]] | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
! <!-- recipe name --> | |||
| <!-- step --> | |||
| <!-- chiller temperature --> | |||
| <!-- dep time --> | |||
| <!-- dep pressure --> | |||
| <!-- dep C4F8 flow --> | |||
| <!-- dep SF6 flow --> | |||
| <!-- dep O2 flow --> | |||
| <!-- dep coil power --> | |||
| <!-- etch time --> | |||
| <!-- etch pressure --> | |||
| <!-- etch C4F8 flow --> | |||
| <!-- etch SF6 flow --> | |||
| <!-- etch O2 flow --> | |||
! <!-- etch coil power --> | |||
| <!-- etch platen power --> | |||
| LF+B100 <!-- hardware --> | |||
| [[Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/nanobosch/nb-1.2 | Click]] | |||
|- | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 14:51, 2 February 2023
Feedback to this page: click here
Development of continuous nanoetch
Unless otherwise stated, all content on this page was created by Jonas Michael-Lindhard, DTU Nanolab
The recipes below have been run on 2" wafers with 30/60/90/120/150 nm lines in zep resist. The wafers were crystalbonded to a 4" oxide carrier leaving only a very small fraction (much less than 1% ) of silicon to be etched. If you intend to etch most of the surface of the wafer to create very small posts or ridges (rather than holes or trenches)
The most used one is the nano1.42 recipe - to access the results, click on the bold link in the bottom of the table.
Recipe | nano1.0 | nano1.1 | nano1.2 | nano1.3 | nano1.21 | nano1.4 | nano1.41 | nano1.42 | nano1.43 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C4F8 (sccm) | 52 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
SF6 (sccm) | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 |
O2 (sccm) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Coil power (W) | 800 (F) | 600 (F) | 800 (F) | 600 (F) | 800 (F) | 800 (F) | 800 (F) | 800 (F) | 800 (F) |
Platen power (W) | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 40 | 30 |
Pressure (mtorr) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Temperature (degs C) | 10 | 10 | -10 | -10 | -10 | -20 | -20 | -20 | -20 |
Process time (s) | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
Etch rates (nm/min) | |||||||||
Averages | 295 | 228 | 299 | 235 | 183 | 183 | 166 | 160 | 148 |
Std. Dev | 36 | 29 | 37 | 20 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 6 |
Zep etch rate (nm/min) | |||||||||
172 | 95 | 94 | 69 | 67 | 101 | 65 | 55 | ||
Sidewall angle (degrees) | |||||||||
Averages | 93 | 94 | 92 | 94 | 91 | 91 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
Std. Dev | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
CD loss (nm pr edge) | |||||||||
Averages | -11 | -13 | -17 | -10 | -10 | -10 | -20 | -13 | -24 |
Std. Dev | 12 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 21 |
Bowing (nm) | |||||||||
Averages | 31 | 42 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 6 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
Std. Dev | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Bottom curvature | |||||||||
Averages | -45 | -45 | -44 | -43 | -32 | -32 | -34 | -32 | -39 |
Std. Dev | 5 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
Images | Images | Images | Images | Images | Images | Images | Images | Images | Images |
- Etch of nanostructures in silicon on the ICP Metal Etcher
- Nanoetch contest: DRIE-Pegasus versus ASE (nano1.42 versus pxnano2)
Development of switched nanoetch process
On the basis of the pxnano2 recipe from the ASE we will try to make a similar Bosch process on the Pegasus.
Recipe | Step | Temp. | Deposition step | Etch step | Process observations | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time | Pressure | C4F8 | SF6 | O2 | Coil | Time | Pressure | C4F8 | SF6 | O2 | Coil | Platen | Hardware | Runs | |||
nanobosch6 | A | 20 | 2.5 | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 5.0 | 10 | 40 | 60 | 5 | 350 | 30 | LF+B100 | Click |
nb-1.0 | A | 20 | 2.5 | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 5.0 | 10 | 50 | 50 | 5 | 350 | 30 | LF+B100 | Click |
nb-1.1 | A | 20 | 2.5 | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 5.0 | 10 | 50 | 50 | 5 | 350 | 50 | LF+B100 | Click |
nb-1.2 | A | 20 | 2.5 | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 5.0 | 10 | 50 | 50 | 5 | 500 | 50 | LF+B100 | Click |
barcstrip | A | 20 | 30 | 4 (3@15) | 0 | 0 | 40 | 200 | 20 | LF+B100 | Click | ||||||
nanobosch7 | A | 20 | 2.5 | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 5.0 | 10 | 40 | 60 | 5 | 350 | 30 | LF+B100 | Click |
LF+B100 | Click |