Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/EBeamLithography/EBLProcessExamples: Difference between revisions

Thope (talk | contribs)
Thope (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page is under construction. In time we will fill it with relevant process examples and relevant data.
=Mix-and-match with EBL and UV lithography=
=Mix-and-match with EBL and UV lithography=
Using mix-and-match it is possible to combine EBL and UV lithography using selected resists. Read more on the [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Mix-and-match|Mix-and-match page.]]
Using mix-and-match it is possible to combine EBL and UV lithography using selected resists. Read more on the [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Mix-and-match|Mix-and-match page.]]
Line 40: Line 38:


By default the subfield size is 4x4 µm. This will match for instance a beam pitch of 200 nm, since it will place 20 beam shots along each axis. It does not match a beam pitch of 190 nm for instance, since 4000 nm / 190 nm = 21.05. If one wants a beam pitch of 190 nm the subfield size should be changed to 3.990 x 3.990 µm. This is done in the JDF file by changing the '''SPPRM''' command from the usual '''SPPRM 4.0,,,,1.0,1''' to '''SPPRM 3.99,,,,1.0,1''', since the first number determines subfield size.
By default the subfield size is 4x4 µm. This will match for instance a beam pitch of 200 nm, since it will place 20 beam shots along each axis. It does not match a beam pitch of 190 nm for instance, since 4000 nm / 190 nm = 21.05. If one wants a beam pitch of 190 nm the subfield size should be changed to 3.990 x 3.990 µm. This is done in the JDF file by changing the '''SPPRM''' command from the usual '''SPPRM 4.0,,,,1.0,1''' to '''SPPRM 3.99,,,,1.0,1''', since the first number determines subfield size.
A significant limitation of this approach is that the beam pitch as determined by the SHOT S command has a maximum value of 1020 units, i.e. 251 nm. The method described below does not have this limitation.


{| style="border: none; border-spacing: 0; margin: 1em auto; text-align: center;"
{| style="border: none; border-spacing: 0; margin: 1em auto; text-align: center;"
Line 49: Line 49:
|}
|}


==Small box approach==
==Array of small boxes approach==
In this approach the pattern is an array of 2x2 nm boxes, each box will be filled with a single beam shot and hence the beam placement is determined by the boxes in the array. Thus, this is a more versatile approach as it allows the user to easily vary distance between shots and create hexagonal arrays or similar. The exposure is however somewhat slower since each shape adds a few ns of beam settling time. The beam pitch as setup in the SHOT S command should be large enough that a single beam shot is placed in each 2x2 nm box, i.e. it should just be larger than 2 nm.


==Results==
==Results==
The results below are made with the approach described above. The pattern is defined in 180 nm AR-P 6200 on a silicon substrate, exposed at 29 nA. The circle size as a function of dwell time and beam pitch is illustrated in the graph. It is seen that the circle pitch has a significant impact on circle size even for the same dwell time, this is naturally due to the proximity effect and can not be avoided. The graph can however serve as a guide to chose the right combination of beam pitch and dwell time to obtain the array one desires.


{| style="border: none; border-spacing: 0; margin: 1em auto; text-align: center;"
{| style="border: none; border-spacing: 0; margin: 1em auto; text-align: center;"