Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/Profiler/Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test: Difference between revisions
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@ | '''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Characterization/Profiler/Optical_Profiler_(Sensofar)_acceptance_test click here]''' | ||
=<span style="color:#FF0000"> This optical profiler has been decommissioned and replaced by the S Neox system </span> = | |||
=Results from the Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test= | =Results from the Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test= | ||
The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by ST Instruments and Sensofar together with | The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by ST Instruments and Sensofar together with | ||
Pernille V. Larsen@ | Pernille V. Larsen@ DTU nanolab and Berit G. Herstrøm @ DTU nanolab. | ||
==This Table shows an overview of the acceptance tests== | ==This Table shows an overview of the acceptance tests== | ||
Line 120: | Line 121: | ||
*Objective: Interferometric 50x DI | *Objective: Interferometric 50x DI | ||
*Z scan: VSI | *Z scan: VSI | ||
*Light | *Light source: increased gain and contrast | ||
==Results of acceptance test no. 4== | ==Results of acceptance test no. 4== | ||
Line 127: | Line 128: | ||
Measurement: Depth of pattern | Measurement: Depth of pattern | ||
Standard profiler measurement: | Standard profiler measurement:335 nm | ||
Acceptance criteria:Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement (331.65nm-338.35nm) and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1% | Acceptance criteria:Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement (331.65nm-338.35nm) and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1% | ||
Line 248: | Line 249: | ||
'''Settings:''' | '''Settings:''' | ||
Two different setting were tried out, the second was the most | Two different setting were tried out, the second was the most successful: | ||
Setting no. 1: | Setting no. 1: | ||
Line 391: | Line 392: | ||
Acceptance criteria: Repeatability within 0.2% | Acceptance criteria: Repeatability within 0.2% | ||
Note: Because the surface roughness of the sample was very low and the noise/vibration level too high we could not obtain the specified | Note: Because the surface roughness of the sample was very low and the noise/vibration level too high we could not obtain the specified repeatability. | ||
Line 397: | Line 398: | ||
'''Result''' | '''Result''' | ||
*The surface roughness (Ra) was 0.5nm | *The surface roughness (Ra) was 0.5nm | ||
*The | *The repeatability over 10 measurements was 34% | ||
*The maximum deviation in roughness was 0.2nm | *The maximum deviation in roughness was 0.2nm | ||
Latest revision as of 10:35, 3 February 2023
Feedback to this page: click here
This optical profiler has been decommissioned and replaced by the S Neox system
Results from the Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test
The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by ST Instruments and Sensofar together with Pernille V. Larsen@ DTU nanolab and Berit G. Herstrøm @ DTU nanolab.
This Table shows an overview of the acceptance tests
' | Title | Sample description / measurement | Acceptance criteria |
1 | Patterned flat sample of silicon | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:10 on a 10 µm wide trench |
Depth 100±2 µm |
2 | Patterned flat sample of silicon. | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:11 on a 8 µm wide trench |
Depth 91±2 µm |
3 | Patterned flat sample of silicon | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:13 on a 6.4 µm wide trench |
Depth 85±2 µm |
4 | Patterned flat sample of glass | 3D profile of pattern etched down in a quartz sample. Pattern size 20 µm x 20 µm, depth 500 nm |
Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1% |
5 | Flat sample of silicon with thick patterned oxide | Step height of patterned thick (10 µm) oxide on top of a silicon wafer. 7 µm deep pattern, trench width 6 µm |
Step height must be within ±3% of a SEM profile measurement. |
6 | Flat sample of silicon with thick layer of patterned polymer | Sample material: SU8 on silicon. Pillar heights of 69 µm with 25 µm between pillar edges |
Height 69±2 µm |
7 | Free standing structure | Measure bow due to stress of a membrane. Membrane material: Si(2 µm)/SiO2(~1 µm)/Au(50 nm) Membrane size: honey comb structure approximately 150 µm in diameter Bow < 500 nm |
Membrane bow repeatability of 5 successive measurement within 2% |
8 | Stitching of large area | Stitching 4 mm x 4 mm on same sample as in 7. The area consists of many closed packed honey comb formed membranes. | Membrane bow must the same as on 7 within 2% |
9 | Narrow trenches and holes | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate 2.5 µm wide trench in silicon with a depth of 20 µm |
Depth 20±2 µm |
10 | Film thickness measurement of transparent thin film | Transparent thin film thickness of 28 nm SiO2 on Si | SiO2 thickness 28±1 nm |
11 | Measurements of multiple stacks | 120 nm nitride on 110 nm oxide on a silicon substrate | Within ±2% on each layer from an ellipsometer measurement. |
12 | Film thickness measurements of transparent films on small structure | Sample material: Si with 1.5 µm patterned AZ-resist Measure thickness of AZ-resist on pillars of 50 µm in diameter |
Within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement. |
13 | Roughness repeatability | Sample material: Si wafer with poly-silicon layer 3 successive measurements of the roughness |
Repeatability within 0.2% |
Results of acceptance test no. 1, 2 and 3
Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate
Measurement: Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:10, 1:11 and 1:13 on a 10µm, 8mm and 6.4µm wide trenches respectively
Acceptance criteria: Depth 100±2 µm, 91±2µm and 85±2µm. The SEM profile images of the three trenches are shown here:
Results
Test no. 1 was done in two ways:
- With confocal objective EPI 100x-N: See the results here
- With Interferometric objective 50X DI: See the results here
Test no. 2 was done using: confocal objective EPI 100x-N: See the results here
Test no. 3 was done using: confocal objective EPI 100x-N: See the results here
Settings for methode no. 1 for test no. 1, 2 and 3: confocal
Recipe: Trench
- Operation mode: trench
- + Raw smoothing confocal
- + fine shift
- Objective: EPI 100X-N
- Z scan
- Dual - bottom up
- top: 8µm
- Gap: 91µm (<- choose the trench depth)
- Bottom: 8µm
- Speed factor: 1x
- + Linear stage
- Dual - bottom up
- Threshold: 0.0%
- Light source
- Levels: 2
- 900 -> 60 (might need to be set a little different)
- Gain: default
- Levels: 2
Setting for methode no. 2 for test no. 1: interferometric
We do not have a recipe for that but we used:
- Objective: Interferometric 50x DI
- Z scan: VSI
- Light source: increased gain and contrast
Results of acceptance test no. 4
Sample material: Patterned flat sample of glass
Measurement: Depth of pattern
Standard profiler measurement:335 nm
Acceptance criteria:Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement (331.65nm-338.35nm) and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1%
System settings:
Objective: DI 50x-N
VSI z scan: 10µm
Treshold: 1%
Average 4 images (to reduce noise)
Results
It was repeated 10 Time.
The first measurement is shown here
This table show the depth value for the 10 measurements
' | Measured depth [nm] | Repeated 20170925 with cover off | Repeated 20180816 after repair |
1 | 337.5 | 347.9 | 341.1 |
2 | 336.5 | 333.9 | 340.4 |
3 | 334.7 | 341.5 | 337.2 |
4 | 335.5 | 343.2 | 330.8 |
5 | 339.2 | 347.7 | 339.0 |
6 | 337.2 | 345.4 | 340.0 |
7 | 334.2 | 341.8 | 338.8 |
8 | 335.5 | 337.9 | 339.8 |
9 | 341.1 | 342.1 | 334.6 |
10 | 344.4 | 335.9 | 336.4 |
Average depth | 337.58 | 341.73 | 337.82 |
Repeatability | 3.0% (the bad repeatability was accepted due to the high noise level in the room) | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Results of acceptance test no. 5
Sample: Flat sample of silicon with thick patterned oxide (APOX).
Measurement: Step height of patterned thick (10 µm) oxide on top of a silicon wafer. The pattern is aprox. 7µm thick.
Acceptance criteria: Step height must be within ±3% of a SEM profile measurement. See the SEM profile here:
Settings:
- Recipe: Acceptance nr. 5 SMR
- Mode: default
- Objective: 50x-DI
- VSI Z scan 18.0µm
- Threshold 2%
- Note: Scan only in the APOX (not in the Si) or else the system will get confused.
See the result here:
Results of acceptance test no. 6
Sample: Flat sample of silicon with thick layer of patterned SU8.
Measure: step height.
Acceptance criteria: Height 69±2 µm
Settings:
- Recipe: Acceptance nr. 6 SMR
- Mode: application Acceptance 6
- Raw smoothing confocal
- Coarse shift single samle
- Reject multiple reflections
- Objective: Confocal EPI 20x-N
- Z scan range: 104µm
- Threshold: 2.0%
See the result here:
Results of acceptance test no. 7
Sample: Free standing structure. Membrane material: Si(2 µm)/SiO2(~1 µm)/Au(50 nm). Membrane size: honey comb structure approximately 150 µm in diameter
Measure: Measure bow due to stress of a membrane.
Acceptance criteria: Membrane bow repeatability of 5 successive measurement within 2%
The sample was not as we suspected. There was almost no bow. The membrane looked broken and it did not really make any sense to measure the bow.
Settings: Two different setting were tried out, the second was the most successful:
Setting no. 1:
- Objective: DI 50x-N
- PSI
- Threshold 2%
Setting no. 2:
- Objective: DI 50x-N
- Z scan: VSI 10µm
- Threshold: 1.0%
Result
The measurement we did are shown here:
Results of acceptance test no. 8
Measurement: Stitching 4 mm x 4 mm on same sample as in 7.
Sample: The area consists of many closed packed honey comb formed membranes
Acceptance criteria: Membrane bow must the same as on 7 within 2%
Settings:
- Extended topography
- Objective: DI 20x-N
- Z scan: VSI: 40µm
- Threshold: 1.0%
Result:
We made a stitched image of the hole membrane and repeated it two times. It looked much the same but as for test 7 it was hard to do any measurements on it. See the images and profiles in the result file:
Results of acceptance test no. 9
Sample: Patterned silicon substrate.
Measurement: Narrow trench depth
Acceptance criteria: 20±2µm, see the SEM images here:
Setting
Recipe: Narrow trench
- Operation mode: narrow trench
- Coarse shift single sampling
- Objective: EPI 100X-N
- Z scan:
- Dual - bottom up
- top: 4µm
- Gap: 20µm (the trench depth)
- Bottom: 4µm
- Dual - bottom up
- Speed factor: 1x
- Threshold: 0.0%
- Light source:
- Levels: 2
- 176 -> 30 (might need to be set a little different)
- Gain: default
Result
Results of acceptance test no. 10
Sample: Transparent thin film thickness of 28 nm SiO2 on Si
Measurement:Film thickness measurement of transparent thin film
Acceptance criteria: SiO2 thickness 28±1 nm
Settings
- Objective: EPI 20x-N
- Model: SiO2 thermal
Result
The result was 28.7nm
Results of acceptance test no. 11
Sample: 120 nm nitride on 110 nm oxide on a silicon substrate
Measurement: Measurements of multiple stacks
Acceptance criteria: Within ±2% on each layer from an ellipsometer measurement (SiO2: 112nm, Si3N4: 139nm)
Settings Model layers use:
- SiO2_(therm)
- Si3N4
Result
- SiO2: 113.1nm
- Si3N4: 136.9nm
Results of acceptance test no. 12
Sample: Si with 1.4 µm patterned AZ-resist on 50µm pillars
Measurement: Film thickness measurements of transparent films on small structure
Acceptance criteria: Within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement.
Settings
Used Models -> Others -> Cauchy
Options -> Roughness -> change amplitude fitting
Result
Within limits
Results of acceptance test no. 13
Sample: Si wafer with poly-silicon layer
Measurement: Roughness repeatability, 3 successive measurements of the roughness
Acceptance criteria: Repeatability within 0.2%
Note: Because the surface roughness of the sample was very low and the noise/vibration level too high we could not obtain the specified repeatability.
Result
- The surface roughness (Ra) was 0.5nm
- The repeatability over 10 measurements was 34%
- The maximum deviation in roughness was 0.2nm
Se the number in the file below: