Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner: Maskless 02 processing: Difference between revisions

Taran (talk | contribs)
Taran (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Category: Equipment|Lithography]]
[[Category: Equipment|Lithography]]
[[Category: Lithography]]
[[Category: Lithography]]
[[Image:DUV_wafers.jpg|500px|frameless|right|]]


__TOC__
__TOC__
Line 12: Line 10:
=Exposure technology=
=Exposure technology=


Aligner: Maskless 02 is ''not'' a direct writer. In the maskless aligner, the exposure light is passed through a spatial light modulator, much like in a video projector, and projected onto the substrate, exposing a small area of the design at a time. The substrate is fully exposed by scanning the exposure field across the substrate in a succession of exposure stripes.
Aligner: Maskless 02 is ''not'' a direct laser writer. In the maskless aligner, the exposure light is passed through a spatial light modulator, much like in a video projector, and projected onto the substrate, exposing a small area of the design at a time. The substrate is fully exposed by scanning the exposure field across the substrate in a succession of exposure stripes.


The light source is a laser diode (array) with a wavelength of 375 nm (2.8 W). The spatial light modulator is a digital micro-mirror device. The individual mirrors of the DMD are switched on and off in order to represent the design, and the laser is flashed on and off, in order to give the desired exposure dose. The exposure image is projected onto the substrate through a lens-system. The projected image has a pixel size of 500x500 nm on the substrate surface. The image is scanned across the substrate in stripes in order to expose the entire design. Each stripe is overlapping 2 or 5 times, depending on the chosen [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing#Exposure_mode|exposure mode]]), in order to reduce light-source non-uniformity effects and stitching errors. The address grid size is 250 nm or 100 nm for Fast and High Quality exposure mode, respectively.
The light source is a laser diode (array) with a wavelength of 375 nm (2.8 W). The spatial light modulator is a digital micro-mirror device. The individual mirrors of the DMD are switched on and off in order to represent the design, and the laser is flashed on and off, in order to give the desired exposure dose. The exposure image is projected onto the substrate through a lens-system. The projected image has a pixel size of 500x500 nm on the substrate surface. The image is scanned across the substrate in stripes in order to expose the entire design. Each stripe is overlapping 2 or 5 times, depending on the chosen [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing#Exposure_mode|exposure mode]]), in order to reduce light-source non-uniformity effects and stitching errors. The address grid size is 250 nm or 100 nm for Fast and High Quality exposure mode, respectively.
Line 24: Line 22:


The correct way to determine the best dose-defocus settings is to generate a so-called Bossung plot (known from projection lithography), which plots the printed linewidth as a function of dose and defocus. From this, the most stable region of parameter space is chosen, i.e. the region where the linewidth changes the least when dose and defocus changes. Any deviation from the design linewidth may be corrected using the CD bias parameter. This typically involves SEM imaging of resist cross-sections, and quickly becomes time-consuming. However, in most cases, inspection of a dose-defocus matrix (easily generated using the series exposure function) in an optical microscope will get you most of the way.  
The correct way to determine the best dose-defocus settings is to generate a so-called Bossung plot (known from projection lithography), which plots the printed linewidth as a function of dose and defocus. From this, the most stable region of parameter space is chosen, i.e. the region where the linewidth changes the least when dose and defocus changes. Any deviation from the design linewidth may be corrected using the CD bias parameter. This typically involves SEM imaging of resist cross-sections, and quickly becomes time-consuming. However, in most cases, inspection of a dose-defocus matrix (easily generated using the series exposure function) in an optical microscope will get you most of the way.  
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


==Defocus==
==Exposure dose and defocus==
[[Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/Resist#Aligner:_Maskless_02|Information on UV exposure dose]]


Aligner: Maskless 02 offers two autofocus modes; optical or pneumatic. The autofocus mode is selected via the substrate template. The defocus process parameter is used to compensate for offsets between the autofocus mechanism and the focal point of the exposure light, and simultaneously optimize print quality in different resists and varying thicknesses.
Aligner: Maskless 02 offers two autofocus modes; optical or pneumatic. The autofocus mode is selected via the substrate template. The defocus process parameter is used to compensate for offsets between the autofocus mechanism and the focal point of the exposure light, and simultaneously optimize print quality in different resists and varying thicknesses.
Line 37: Line 35:
'''Pneumatic:'''
'''Pneumatic:'''


Substrates must be at least 5x5 mm to be successfully loaded. The pneumatic AF freezes at a distance of 3 mm form the substrate edge, which means that in order to have any ''dynamic'' focusing, using the pneumatic AF, the substrate must be larger than 6x6 mm.
Substrates must be at least 5x5 mm to be successfully loaded. The pneumatic AF freezes at a distance of 3 mm form the substrate edge, which means that in order to have any ''dynamic'' focusing, using the pneumatic AF, the substrate must be larger than 6x6 mm. When using the pneumatic autofocus, we recommend a substrate size of at least 20x20 mm.


==Exposure mode==
==Exposure mode==
Line 101: Line 99:
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


<!-- AFTER THE CONVERSION TO WRITE MODE 2, this data is no longer relevant. No official acceptance test was performed after the write mode conversion.
<!-- AFTER THE CONVERSION TO WRITE MODE 2, this data is no longer relevant. No official acceptance test was performed after the write mode conversion. TARAN 5/9-23
==Acceptance test==
==Acceptance test==
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>
Line 156: Line 154:


==Substrate centring and flat alignment==
==Substrate centring and flat alignment==
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>


During substrate detection, the sample is scanned along the X- and Y-axes, as well as diagonally. From these measurements, the size (diameter) of the substrate is calculated, as well as the stage position matching the center of the substrate. This stage position will be the default origin for the subsequent exposure.
During substrate detection, the sample is scanned along the X- and Y-axes, as well as diagonally. From these measurements, the size (diameter) of the substrate is calculated, as well as the stage position matching the center of the substrate. This stage position will be the default origin for the subsequent exposure.


At the end of substrate detection, the sample is scanned twice along the bottom edge (flat), in order to determine the substrate rotation. This angle will be presented in the exposure panel along with the option to expose the design rotated in order to compensate for this angle, i.e. aligned to the flat/edge of the substrate.
At the end of substrate detection, the sample is scanned twice along the bottom edge (flat), in order to determine the substrate rotation. This angle will be presented in the exposure panel along with the option to expose the design rotated in order to compensate for this angle, i.e. aligned to the flat/edge of the substrate.


'''Result of using "Expose with substrate angle" ("Expose with Global Angle"):'''
'''Result of using "Expose with substrate angle" ("Expose with Global Angle"):'''
*Rotation: 0.5±0.2°
*Rotation: 0 ±0.2°
*Centring:
*Centring:
** '''X''' 100±250µm
** '''X''' 0 ±100µm
** '''Y''' 200±250µm
** '''Y''' 0 ±100µm
Taran Mar 2019, average of 3 4" wafers.<br>
Taran Sep 2023, average of 3 4" wafers.<br>
The error on the flat alignment is surprising when compared to the 0±0.1° measured on Aligner: Maskless 01. The centring, on the other hand, is seen to be within a few hundred µm, without correcting for the flats.
 


'''Result of loading the same substrate ~10 times without removing it from the stage:'''
'''Result of loading the same substrate ~10 times without removing it from the stage:'''
Line 183: Line 181:
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Optical autofocus  
|Optical autofocus
(as installed)
| -4.7 mRad
| 3.7 mRad
| ±13.9 mRad
±0.8°
 
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Pneumatic autofocus
(as installed)
| -3.1 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
±0.08°
 
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Positioning a wafer repeatedly using the alignment tool
(measured using pneumatic autofocus)
| -1.7 mRad
| ±8.3 mRad
±0.5°
 
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Optical autofocus
after hardware upgrade February 2020
| -0.3 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
±0.08°
(±0.08°)


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Pneumatic autofocus  
|Pneumatic autofocus
after hardware upgrade February 2020
| -2.8 mRad
| -0.6 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
±0.08°
(±0.08°)


|}
|}
 
Measured after conversion to write mode 2 in 2023 by Taran Sep 2023.
This shows that using optical autofocus (as installed) significantly increased the error on the flat measurement, while using pneumatic atuofocus performs similar to Aligner: Maskless 01. Initially, it was thus recommended to use pneumatic autofocus (or rely only on the alignment tool) for the first print if crystal alignment is important for subsequent processing. However, after the autofocus hardware and software upgrade in February 2020, the two methods yield equally good results.


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />
Line 362: Line 333:


=Alignment=
=Alignment=
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>


'''Important information regarding alignment:'''
'''Important information regarding alignment:'''
Line 368: Line 338:
After alignment to the specified alignment marks, the Aligner: Maskless 02 will automatically compensate for the translation (shift) and rotation detected during the alignment. However, the translation is set using only the first alignment mark. This means that if there is any run-out (gain) in the wafer, the alignment will be perfect at the first alignment position, while the second alignment position will be off by the run-out error. The central part of the print will be misaligned by half the run-out error. This is different compared to alignment in a mask aligner, where the user usually splits the run-out error between the two sides, resulting in good alignment in the center. In Aligner: Maskless 02, run-out may be compensated by activating the scaling function, which only becomes available when using 3 or more alignment positions. To help assess whether the measured scaling or shearing is significant, 10 ppm (scaling = 1.000010 or 0.999990; shearing = ±0.010 mRad) corresponds to a difference of 1µm from one edge to the other on a 4" wafer.
After alignment to the specified alignment marks, the Aligner: Maskless 02 will automatically compensate for the translation (shift) and rotation detected during the alignment. However, the translation is set using only the first alignment mark. This means that if there is any run-out (gain) in the wafer, the alignment will be perfect at the first alignment position, while the second alignment position will be off by the run-out error. The central part of the print will be misaligned by half the run-out error. This is different compared to alignment in a mask aligner, where the user usually splits the run-out error between the two sides, resulting in good alignment in the center. In Aligner: Maskless 02, run-out may be compensated by activating the scaling function, which only becomes available when using 3 or more alignment positions. To help assess whether the measured scaling or shearing is significant, 10 ppm (scaling = 1.000010 or 0.999990; shearing = ±0.010 mRad) corresponds to a difference of 1µm from one edge to the other on a 4" wafer.


In order to get good alignment, it is advised to use four alignment marks for alignment, and to activate scaling (possibly also shearing) before starting the exposure. Optical or pneumatic auto-focus should not affect the result, but it is recommended to use the "High Res" camera for the final alignment of each mark in order to achieve the best overlay accuracy.
In order to get good alignment, it is advised to use four alignment marks for alignment, and to activate scaling (possibly also shearing) before starting the exposure. Optical or pneumatic auto-focus should not affect the result, but it is recommended to use the "High Res" camera for the final alignment of each mark in order to achieve the best overlay accuracy. Exposure using the fast mode decreases the overlay accuracy, since the address grid size is increased to 250 nm.


<!-- AFTER THE CONVERSION TO WRITE MODE 2, this data is no longer relevant. TARAN 6/9-23
'''Alignment accuracy:'''
'''Alignment accuracy:'''


Line 441: Line 412:


The result shows significant misalignment between the two layers, higher than what is seen in true overlay tests. This is believed to be an effect of drift during the first, long print (most likely heating of the stage), as the misalignment is seen to be biggest between parts printed furthest apart in time (i.e. on the left side of the wafer). In a normal overlay print, this error can be at least partially compensated using the scaling and shearing function available for three or more alignment marks/positions.
The result shows significant misalignment between the two layers, higher than what is seen in true overlay tests. This is believed to be an effect of drift during the first, long print (most likely heating of the stage), as the misalignment is seen to be biggest between parts printed furthest apart in time (i.e. on the left side of the wafer). In a normal overlay print, this error can be at least partially compensated using the scaling and shearing function available for three or more alignment marks/positions.
 
-->
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


==Top Side Alignment==
==Top Side Alignment==
<!--
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>
-->


'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 0.5µm
'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' ±0.5 µm


'''Camera field of view (W x H):''' <br>
'''Camera field of view (W x H):''' <br>
Line 478: Line 451:




'''Alignment test:'''
'''Alignment test''' (unless otherwise stated, these tests use 375nm laser, High Res camera, and Quality exposure)
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
|-
|-
Line 488: Line 461:
!Shearing [mRad]
!Shearing [mRad]
!Misalignment [µm]
!Misalignment [µm]
!Translation [µm]
!Run-out [ppm]
!Run-out [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
|-
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
| 6
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.004
| -0.5±0.08
| -0.3±1.7
| 0.6±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| 9
| -0.3±0.08
| 1.1±1.7
| -1.1±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
'''Low Res camera'''
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
| 5
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.004
| -0.95±0.13
| -1.1±2.5
| -0.8±1.3
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| 7
| 0.1±0.1
| -1.1±1.7
| -0.8±2.5
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
'''Fast exposure'''
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
| 7
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.003
| -0.65±0.05
| -0.6±1.7
| 0.3±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| 8
| -0.25±0.05
| 0.3±1.7
| -0.3±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|'''2''' alignment marks
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
|NA
|rowspan="2"|NA
| -0.75±0.3
| -8.9±1.7
| -1.4±2.5
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| NA
| -0.55±0.28
| -6.1±2.5
| -0.8±1.2
<!--


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|2 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|2 alignment marks
375nm, high res camera


(Taran Apr 2019)
(Taran Apr 2019)
Line 503: Line 558:
|rowspan="2"|NA
|rowspan="2"|NA
| 0.25±0.15
| 0.25±0.15
| 0.25±0.05
| 1.7±1.7
| 1.7±1.7
| 2.2±1.3
| 2.2±1.3
Line 512: Line 566:
| NA
| NA
| 0.3±0.13
| 0.3±0.13
| 0.29±0.05
| 0.8±1.7
| 0.8±1.7
| 0.0±1.7
| 0.0±1.7
Line 519: Line 572:
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
375nm, high res camera


(Taran Apr 2019)
(Taran Apr 2019)
Line 526: Line 578:
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.001
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.001
| 0.2±0.05
| 0.2±0.05
| 0.17±0.05
| -0.6±1.7
| -0.6±1.7
| 0.3±1.2
| 0.3±1.2
Line 535: Line 586:
| -1
| -1
| 0.4±0.05
| 0.4±0.05
| 0.42±0.05
| 0.6±1.7
| 0.6±1.7
| 0.6±1.2
| 0.6±1.2
Line 542: Line 592:
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
375nm, low res camera
Low Res camera


(Taran Apr 2019)
(Taran Apr 2019)
Line 549: Line 599:
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.002
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.002
| -0.05±0.13
| -0.05±0.13
| -0.06±0.05
| -1.9±1.7
| -1.9±1.7
| 0.8±1.3
| 0.8±1.3
Line 557: Line 606:
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| -2
| -2
| 0.3±0.05
| 0.3±0.05
| 0.3±0.05
| -0.6±1.7
| -0.6±1.7
| 1.1±1.7
| 1.1±1.7


-->
|}
|}


 
<!--
'''Alignment test with scaled first print:'''
'''Alignment test with scaled first print'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
|-
|-
Line 627: Line 676:


|}
|}
-->


==Back Side Alignment==
==Back Side Alignment==
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>


'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 1.0 µm
'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' ±1 µm


'''BSA windows:''' along the X and Y axes, 10 mm wide x 46 mm long, starting 14.5 mm from the center.
'''BSA windows:''' along the X and Y axes, 10 mm wide x 46 mm long, starting 14.5 mm from the center.
Line 648: Line 697:
! width="320" |
! width="320" |


|+'''Substrate view during backside alignment'''
|+'''Substrate view during backside alignment. Screenshots by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.'''
|- border="0" align="center"
|- border="0" align="center"
|[[Image:MLA150 BSA 2inch.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150 BSA 2inch.JPG|300px]]
Line 675: Line 724:
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Align-flip180-align, 3 points <br/> 375 nm
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Align - flip 180° - align<br>3 point average
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| -0.625 ±0.125
| -0.625 ±0.125
Line 686: Line 735:
| -0.75 ±0.125
| -0.75 ±0.125


<!--
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
Line 709: Line 759:
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| 0.0 ±0.0
| 0.0 ±0.0
 
-->
|}
|}


Line 715: Line 765:


==Advanced Field alignment (TSA)==
==Advanced Field alignment (TSA)==
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>


'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 0.25 µm (5x5 mm<sup>2</sup> area)
'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 0.25 µm (5x5 mm<sup>2</sup> area)
Line 731: Line 780:
!Average [nm]
!Average [nm]
|-
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|25 fields
375 nm, high res camera
(Taran Sept 2023)
|'''X'''
| -450 ±75
| -438 ±75
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| -200 ±50
| -212 ±50


|-
|-
Line 747: Line 812:
| 150 ±50
| 150 ±50
| 128 ±50
| 128 ±50
<!--


|-
|-
Line 779: Line 846:
| 0 ±50
| 0 ±50
| 16 ±50
| 16 ±50
 
-->
|}
|}


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />