Jump to content

Specific Process Knowledge/Thin film deposition/Temescal/Acceptance Test: Difference between revisions

Reet (talk | contribs)
Paphol (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Thin_film_deposition/Temescal/Acceptance_Test click here]'''
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Thin_film_deposition/Temescal/Acceptance_Test click here]'''


<i> Unless otherwise stated, this page is written by <b>DTU Nanolab internal</b></i>


==Temescal acceptance test ==
==Temescal acceptance test ==
Line 22: Line 23:
The thickness uniformity was not tested for the 8" sample holder nor for the tilted sample holder.
The thickness uniformity was not tested for the 8" sample holder nor for the tilted sample holder.


We cannot guarantee that the batch-to-batch thickness reproducibility will always be below 3 % as there may be more drift over longer times. We check the thickness of a Ti/Au deposition every month and ensure that it is within 10 % of the expected value and so far, within in the first half year of using the instrument, the variation has been much less than 10 %.
We cannot guarantee that the batch-to-batch thickness reproducibility will always be below 3 % as there may be more drift over longer times. We check the thickness of a Ti/Au deposition every month and ensure that it is within 10 % of the expected value and in most cases the variation has been much less than 10 %. You can see the deviation over time in the QC data which is found in LabManager under Documents or ask staff for the detailed data.
 


== Sheet resistance uniformity ==
== Sheet resistance uniformity ==