May 2018 Survey

From LabAdviser
Revision as of 11:57, 3 July 2018 by Meno (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<h2> Survey introduction </h2> The May 2018 survey was the 18th survey carried out using a format where individual cleanroom users were asked about their view on various part...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Survey introduction

The May 2018 survey was the 18th survey carried out using a format where individual cleanroom users were asked about their view on various parts of using DTU Danchip's facilities and in particular the cleanroom facilities.

The questionnaire was send to 78 registered users (based on the logging of cleanroom use with more that 10 hours usage/booking) unfortunately 4 of the e-mail adresses were obsolete and thus the mails bounced, which brought the total number of potential answers to 74 . In total an answer fraction of 27%.

This page deals with the comments given as part of the questionnaire. Danchip values this feedback highly.

Comments

The comments appear here as they were written in the feedback field of the questionnaire. In a few cases they have been anonymized or the worst spelling mistakes corrected.

Comment 1

I would like to suggest that frequently faulty equipments should be fixed with a solution that can last for a reasonable time. (such as PECVD4)

Action: xxxx


Comment 2

Unfortunately, we do not have a metal-free fume hood to manually treat samples which are sensitive to metal contamination.

Action: xxxx


Comment 3

Please name the winner publicly. Instability in III-V ICP and Supra2 are annoying. It will good to have room or space for people who need to wait a process for more than 10 minutes, but don't want to leave the cleanroom. Ussually they occupy closest free PC and chair.

Action: xxxx


Comment 4

The very unsatisfied has roots in the delay with gasses where the month by month delay ended up lasting 6 months

Action: xxxx