LabAdviser/314/Microscopy 314-307/Technique/X-ray spectroscopy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== more detailed information == | == more detailed information == | ||
*[[LabAdviser/314/Microscopy 314-307/Technique/X-ray_spectroscopy/EDS-SEM|EDS-SEM with Oxford Aztec]] | |||
[https://labmanager.dtu.dk/view_binary.php?class=MiscDocument&id=16&name=20230714_SEM-EDS_Aztec.pdf SEM-EDS with Aztec] ''-requires login''<br /> | |||
<!-- | |||
*[[LabAdviser/314/Microscopy 314-307/Technique/X-ray_spectroscopy/EDS-SEM|EDS-SEM with Oxford Aztec]] --> | |||
== relevant microscopes == | == relevant microscopes == |
Revision as of 15:25, 14 July 2023
Feedback to this page: click here
This section is written by DTU Nanolab internal if nothing else is stated.
X-ray spectroscopy in electron microscopy
X-ray spectroscopy can be done in both, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It can be differentiated between energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS or EDX) and wave-length dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDS). In both cases, X-rays are generated by the interaction of the probe electrons with matter (idealy the sample). In the case of EDS, the detector consists of a Si-based chip (a so called Silicon drift detector) where the energy of the X-rays is converted into a voltage signal proportinate size. In the case of WDS, X-rays are separated by their wavelength (energy) via diffraction on suitable analyse crystals and detected by their diffraction angle.
EDS is typically suited for fast detection as all X-ray energies are aquired at the same time and therefore is the most applied technique in SEM and TEM. WDS is way slower because each diffraction angle needs to be scanned individually. The advantage is a superior energy resolution and lower detection limit in WDS.
more detailed information
SEM-EDS with Aztec -requires login
relevant microscopes
literature
Oxford Instruments information: