Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner: Maskless 02 processing: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Taran (talk | contribs)
Jehem (talk | contribs)
 
(147 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing click here]'''
{{:Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/authors_generic}}


=Exposure technology=
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php?title=Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing click here]'''


Aligner: Maskless 02 is not a direct writer. In the maskless aligner, the exposure light is passed through a spatial light modulator, much like in a video projector, and projected onto the substrate, thus exposing an area of the design at a time. The substrate is exposed by scanning the exposure field across the substrate in a succession of stripes.
[[Category: Equipment|Lithography]]
[[Category: Lithography]]


The light source is a laser diode (array) with a wavelength of 375nm (2.8W) or 405nm (8W). The spacial light modulator is a digital micro-mirror device. The individual mirrors of the DMD are switched in order to represent the design, and the laser is flashed in order to yield the desired exposure dose. This image is projected onto the substrate through a lens(system). The projected image yields a pixel size of 160nm X 160nm at wafer scale. The image is scanned across the substrate, in order to expose the entire design, each stripe overlapping (2 or 4 times depending on [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing#Exposure_mode|exposure mode]]) in order to minimize uniformity effects and stitching errors. The address grid size is 80nm or 40nm for Fast or High Quality exposure mode, respectively.
[[Image:DUV_wafers.jpg|500px|frameless|right|]]


The writing head of the Aligner: Maskless 02 moves only in the z-direction. Using an optical (or pneumatic) focusing system, the maskless aligner is able to do real-time autofocus. The defocus process parameter is used to compensate offsets in the focusing mechanism, and to optimize printing quality in different resists and varying thicknesses.
__TOC__
The stage of the Aligner: Maskless 02 moves only in x and y. It has no theta-axis. All rotation during alignment is thus accomplished by transformation of the input design.


=Process Parameters=
=Exposure technology=


The lithographic result of exposure on Aligner: Maskless 02 depends on a lot of factors, including the dose and defocus parameters, and the exposure mode used. The optimal dose and defocus depend on the type and thickness of the resist, and the optical properties of the substrate (e.g. reflective/absorbing/transparent). All of these factors influence the obtainable resolution, as well as the writing speed.
Aligner: Maskless 02 is ''not'' a direct writer. In the maskless aligner, the exposure light is passed through a spatial light modulator, much like in a video projector, and projected onto the substrate, exposing a small area of the design at a time. The substrate is fully exposed by scanning the exposure field across the substrate in a succession of exposure stripes.


The correct way to determine the best dose-defocus settings is to generate a so-called Bossung plot (known from projection lithography), which plots the printed linewidth as a function of dose and defocus. From this, the most stable region of parameter space is chosen, i.e. the region where the linewidth changes the least when dose and defocus changes. Any deviation from the design linewidth may be corrected using the CD bias parameter. This typically involves SEM imaging of resist cross-sections, and quickly becomes time consuming. However, in most cases, inspection of a dose-defocus matrix (easily generated using the series exposure function) in an optical microscope will get you most of the way.  
The light source is a laser diode (array) with a wavelength of 375 nm (2.8 W). The spatial light modulator is a digital micro-mirror device. The individual mirrors of the DMD are switched on and off in order to represent the design, and the laser is flashed on and off, in order to give the desired exposure dose. The exposure image is projected onto the substrate through a lens-system. The projected image has a pixel size of 500x500 nm on the substrate surface. The image is scanned across the substrate in stripes in order to expose the entire design. Each stripe is overlapping 2 or 5 times, depending on the chosen [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing#Exposure_mode|exposure mode]]), in order to reduce light-source non-uniformity effects and stitching errors. The address grid size is 250 nm or 100 nm for Fast and High Quality exposure mode, respectively.


'''Data represent dose-defocus tests on Si using optical autofocus unless otherwise stated'''
The writing head of the Aligner: Maskless 02 moves only in the z-direction. Using the optical or pneumatic focusing system, the maskless aligner is able to do real-time dynamic autofocus. The defocus process parameter is used to offset the focusing mechanism, to optimize printing quality in different resists and resist thicknesses, as well as reflective or absorbing surfaces, and transparent or non-transparent substrates.
The stage of the Aligner: Maskless 02 moves only in x and y. It has no theta-axis. All rotation during alignment is accomplished by digitally rotating the design to match the physical rotation of the substrate.


{|border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="7" style="text-align:left;"
=Process Parameters=
|-


|-
The lithographic result of exposure on Aligner: Maskless 02 depends on a lot of factors, including the dose and defocus parameters, and the exposure mode used. The optimal dose and defocus depends on the type and thickness of the resist, as well as the optical properties of the substrate (e.g. reflective/absorbing/transparent). All of these factors influence the obtainable resolution, as well as the writing speed.
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|
!Thickness
!Laser
!Exposure mode
!Dose
!Defoc
!Resolution
!Comments
|-
 
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!rowspan="2"| AZ 5206E
|rowspan="2"| 0.5 µm
|rowspan="2"| 375 nm
| Fast
| 60 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| -6
| 1 µm (not optimized)
| Dev: 2xSP30s
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
| Quality
| 60 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| -6
| ~750 nm (not optimized)
| Dev: 2xSP30s
|-


|-
The correct way to determine the best dose-defocus settings is to generate a so-called Bossung plot (known from projection lithography), which plots the printed linewidth as a function of dose and defocus. From this, the most stable region of parameter space is chosen, i.e. the region where the linewidth changes the least when dose and defocus changes. Any deviation from the design linewidth may be corrected using the CD bias parameter. This typically involves SEM imaging of resist cross-sections, and quickly becomes time-consuming. However, in most cases, inspection of a dose-defocus matrix (easily generated using the series exposure function) in an optical microscope will get you most of the way.
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!rowspan="3"| AZ 5214E
|rowspan="3"| 1.5 µm
| 405 nm
| Fast
| 90 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| -2
| 1-2 µm
| Dev: SP60s
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
|rowspan="2"| 375 nm
| Fast
| 65 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| 2
| ~1 µm
| Dev: SP60s
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
| Quality
| 65 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| 2
| ~750 nm
| Dev: SP60s
|-


|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!rowspan="3"| AZ MiR 701
|rowspan="3"| 1.5 µm
| 405 nm
| Fast
| 200 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| -5
| ~1 µm (not optimized)
| PEB: 60s@110°C, Dev: SP60s
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"| 375 nm
| Fast
| 170 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| -5
| 1 µm
| PEB: 60s@110°C, Dev: SP60s
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
| Quality
| 180 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| -6 (Feb 2019) <br> -2 (Apr 2019)
| <750 nm
| PEB: 60s@110°C, Dev: SP60s <br> Large structures probably over-exposed
|-
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!rowspan="2"| AZ nLOF 2020
|rowspan="2"| 2 µm
|rowspan="2"| 375 nm
| Fast
| 400 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| 5
| ~1 µm (not optimized)
| PEB: 60s@110°C, Dev: SP60s <br> Probably under-exposed
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
| Quality
| 400 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
| 0
| 1 µm
| PEB: 60s@110°C, Dev: SP60s <br> Probably under-exposed
|-
|}
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


==Exposure dose==
==Exposure dose and defocus==
[[Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/Resist#Aligner:_Maskless_02|Information on UV exposure dose]]


[[Image:AZ spectral sensitivity.gif|400x400px|thumb|Spectral sensitivity of AZ resists represented as optical absorption. From https://www.lithoprotect.com/en/worth-knowing/]]
Aligner: Maskless 02 offers two autofocus modes; optical or pneumatic. The autofocus mode is selected via the substrate template. The defocus process parameter is used to compensate for offsets between the autofocus mechanism and the focal point of the exposure light, and simultaneously optimize print quality in different resists and varying thicknesses.


'''Optical:'''


'''Exposure dose relative to exposure at 365nm (Aligner: Maskless 01):'''
Works for substrates down to 3x3 mm.
{|border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="7" style="text-align:center;"
|-


|-
'''Pneumatic:'''
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|
!375nm
!405nm
|-


|-
Substrates must be at least 5x5 mm to be successfully loaded. The pneumatic AF freezes at a distance of 3 mm form the substrate edge, which means that in order to have any ''dynamic'' focusing, using the pneumatic AF, the substrate must be larger than 6x6 mm. When using the pneumatic autofocus, we recommend a substrate size of at least 20x20 mm.
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!AZ 5214E
|0.95
|1.3
|-


|-
==Exposure mode==
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ 4562
|?
|?
|-


|-
Aligner: Maskless 02 offers two exposure modes. The exposure mode is selected during design conversion.
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!AZ MiR 701
|1
|1.2
|-


|-
'''High quality:'''
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ nLOF 2020
|3
|NA
|-


|-
High quality mode is used for minimum stitching effects.<br>
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
In the high quality mode, an area of the pattern is exposed by 5 stripes, each 500 µm wide and exposing a fifth of the dose. At the same time, sub-pixel interpolation is applied, giving an address grid size of 100 nm.
!SU-8
|10-15
|NA
|-
|}


<br clear="all" />
'''Fast:'''


==Defocus==
Fast mode is used for maximum exposure speed.<br>
In the fast mode, each area of the pattern is exposed by 2 stripes only. This effectively reduces the exposure time by 60%, but also increases the size of the address grid in the X-direction to 250 nm. Due to less averaging of non-uniformities, stitching effects will be more prominent in this mode.


The autofocus mode (optical or pneumatic) is selected via the substrate template.
==Writing speed==
(This section was updated 05-09-2023 by taran@nanolab)


'''Optical:''' Varies greatly with resist type and thickness, see [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing#Process_Parameters|Process Parameters]]. Probably also dependent on substrate. Should work for substrates down to 3x3mm<sup>2</sup>.
According to specs (after being converted to write mode 2), the writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 is 500 mm<sup>2</sup>/min in fast mode. Using the high quality exposure mode cuts the expected speed by 2.5, to approximately 200 mm<sup>2</sup>/min. The writing speed of the machine for a 100x100 mm<sup>2</sup> area measured after being modified to write mode 2 (2023-03-21) was ~1200 mm<sup>2</sup>/min at 100 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>.


'''Pneumatic:''' Probably similar for resists of similar thickness, and not likely to vary with substrate. For 375nm exposure, the optimum seems to be around -15 to -10 ([[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing#Large_defocus_range|Large defocus range]]). Substrates must be at least 10x10mm<sup>2</sup> to be successfully loaded, probably larger to successfully print.
When the exposure is started on the maskless aligner, the software starts converting the design to the image files needed for the exposure. When sufficient data has been generated, the hardware starts exposing the sample, while more image data is being generated in the background. This simultaneous data conversion and exposure is called Online conversion. Once a design has been converted (and/or exposed) the data may be reused for repeated exposures. Due to no time lost waiting for data conversion, offline exposure may be several tens of % faster than online. However, the converted data can only be reused if no alignment is needed, including flat alignment ("Expose with substrate angle"/"Expose with Global Angle").


==Exposure mode==
<br clear="all" />


Aligner: Maskless 02 offers two exposure modes. The exposure mode is selected during design conversion.
[[File:Speed vs area newWritehead.png|640px|thumb|The writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 (fast mode, 375nm, 100 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>) as function of the exposure area. Data and graph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2023.]]
 
'''High quality (4)''' mode is used for optimal resolution and minimum stripe stitching effects.
In the high quality mode, an area of the pattern is exposed by 4 stripes, each 160µm wide and exposing a quarter of the dose. At the same time, sub-pixel interpolation is applied, yielding an address grid size of 40nm.
 
'''Fast''' mode is used for maximum exposure speed.
In the fast mode, each area of the pattern is exposed by 2 stripes only. This effectively cuts the exposure time in half, but also doubles the size of the address grid in the X-direction. Due to less averaging of non-uniformities, stitching effects will be more prominent in this mode.
 
==Writing speed==
According to specs, the writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 is 285mm<sup>2</sup>/min in fast mode. Using the high quality exposure mode cuts this speed in half, to approximately 140mm<sup>2</sup>/min. The writing speed for a 100x100mm<sup>2</sup> area measured during installation of the machine (acceptance test) was ~340mm<sup>2</sup>/min for both exposure wavelengths.
 
[[Image:MLA150_speedVSarea.JPG|400x400px|thumb|The writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 (fast mode, 375nm) as a function of the exposure area]]


'''Speed vs. area:'''
'''Speed vs. area:'''


During exposure of a stripe the stage moves at a constant speed. Each stripe thus includes a certain movement overhead for acceleration and deceleration. As the stripes get shorter, this overhead becomes more significant, and the normal writing speed is no longer achieved. For samples smaller than a 2" wafer, the writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 drops below the specified 285mm<sup>2</sup>/min.
During exposure of a stripe the stage moves at a constant speed. Each stripe thus includes a certain movement overhead for acceleration and deceleration. As the stripes get shorter, this overhead becomes more significant, and the normal writing speed is no longer achieved. For smaller samples, the writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 drops below the specified writing speed for a full 100 x 100 mm substrate.
 
When the exposure is started on the maskless aligner, the software starts converting the design to the data needed for the exposure. When sufficient data has been generated, the hardware starts exposing the sample while more data is being generated. This simultaneous data conversion and exposure is called Online conversion. Once a design has been converted (exposed) the data may be reused for repeated exposures (Offline conversion). Due to no time lost waiting for data, offline exposure may be several tens of % faster than online. However, the converted data can only be reused if no alignment is needed, including flat alignment ("Expose with substrate angle").


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


[[Image:MLA150 speedVSdose.JPG|400x400px|thumb|The writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 as a function of the exposure dose]]
[[File:Speed vs dose newWritehead.png|640px|thumb|The writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 (fast mode, 375nm) as function of the exposure dose. The exposure speed was measured using a 10 mm x 100 mm exposure area, but should be approximately the same for a full 100 mm wafer exposure.  Data and graph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2023.]]


'''Speed vs. dose:'''
'''Speed vs. dose:'''


The writing speed remains almost constant up to a dose of 1000mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. Due to the higher power of the 405nm laser, the writing speed remains high up to a dose of 1000mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> for this wavelength. After this point, the writing speed decreases almost linearly with dose. For 375nm, the writing speed is 50% at a dose of 4500mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>, while 405nm requires a dose of 8500mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> to drop to that speed.
The writing speed is constant up to a dose of 100 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>, then drops with increasing dose. At 500 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>, the writing speed is approximately the nominal speed of 500 mm<sup>2</sup>/min. As a rule of thumb, the writing time doubles every time the dose is doubled.


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


'''Speed vs. design:'''
'''Speed vs. design:'''
<!-- <span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span> -->


Depending on the complexity and density of the pattern, the conversion process may slow down the exposure significantly. A 4" wafer exposed with a pattern consisting of 200 million 5µm circles took 65 minutes (154mm<sup>2</sup>/min), compared to the specified 35 minutes (285mm<sup>2</sup>/min). It took 12 minutes before the first stripe was exposed.
Depending on the complexity and density of the pattern, the conversion process may slow down the exposure significantly. A 100 mm wafer exposed with a pattern consisting of 200 million 5 µm circles took more than 16 minutes (600 mm<sup>2</sup>/min), compared to the expected 8-9 minutes (1200 mm<sup>2</sup>/min). It took 6.5 minutes before the first stripe was exposed, and there were several pauses during the print (waiting for data from conversion). Even a simple 100 x 100 mm square takes 1.5 minutes to start printing, lowering the effective writing speed to 1000 mm<sup>2</sup>/min.


The maskless aligner exposes the design in north-south oriented stripes (perpendicular to the flat). The stripes all have the same length, set by the height of the design, and only completely empty stripes are skipped. The writing speed may thus be affected by the layout of the design, as shown below.  
The maskless aligner exposes the design in north-south oriented stripes (perpendicular to the flat). The stripes all have the same length, set by the height of the design, and only completely empty stripes are skipped. The writing speed may thus be affected by the layout of the design, as shown below.  


{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 2px solid darkgray;" align="right"
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 2px solid darkgray;" align="center"
! width="350" |  
! width="350" |  
! width="350" |  
! width="350" |  


|+'''Design case: Five 100µm wide, 40mm long lines, spaced 10mm apart (40x40mm<sup>2</sup>)'''
|+'''Design case: Five 100 µm wide, 40 mm long lines, spaced 10 mm apart (40x40 mm<sup>2</sup>). Data and graphics by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019-2023.'''
|- border="0" align="center"
|- border="0" align="center"
|[[Image:MLA150_LongLinesEW.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150_LongLinesEW.JPG|300px]]
Line 231: Line 96:


|- align="center"
|- align="center"
| This design printed in 6 minutes (260mm<sup>2</sup>/min) ||  This design printed in 1 minute (1600mm<sup>2</sup>/min)
| This design printed in 2.5 minutes (640 mm<sup>2</sup>/min) ||  This design printed in less than 1 minute (1780 mm<sup>2</sup>/min)


|}
|}
Line 237: Line 102:
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


<!-- AFTER THE CONVERSION TO WRITE MODE 2, this data is no longer relevant. No official acceptance test was performed after the write mode conversion. TARAN 5/9-23
==Acceptance test==
==Acceptance test==
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>


Acceptance criteria on a 100 X 100 mm<sup>2</sup> area: Width of smallest resolved line 600±100 nm, alignment error 500 nm, writing speed 285 mm<sup>2</sup>/min.
Acceptance criteria on a 100 X 100 mm<sup>2</sup> area: Width of smallest resolved line 600±100 nm, alignment error 500 nm, writing speed 285 mm<sup>2</sup>/min.
Line 285: Line 152:


|}
|}
-->


=Features=
=Features=


==Substrate centring and flat alignment==
==Substrate centring and flat alignment==
[[Image:section under construction.jpg|70px]]


During substrate detection, the sample is scanned along the X- and Y-axes, as well as diagonally. From these measurements, the size (diameter) of the substrate is calculated, as well as the stage position matching the center of the substrate. This stage position will be the default origin for the subsequent exposure.
During substrate detection, the sample is scanned along the X- and Y-axes, as well as diagonally. From these measurements, the size (diameter) of the substrate is calculated, as well as the stage position matching the center of the substrate. This stage position will be the default origin for the subsequent exposure.
Line 296: Line 162:
At the end of substrate detection, the sample is scanned twice along the bottom edge (flat), in order to determine the substrate rotation. This angle will be presented in the exposure panel along with the option to expose the design rotated in order to compensate for this angle, i.e. aligned to the flat/edge of the substrate.
At the end of substrate detection, the sample is scanned twice along the bottom edge (flat), in order to determine the substrate rotation. This angle will be presented in the exposure panel along with the option to expose the design rotated in order to compensate for this angle, i.e. aligned to the flat/edge of the substrate.


'''Result of using "Expose with substrate angle" on three samples with optical autofocus:'''
 
*Rotation: 0.5±0.2°
'''Result of using "Expose with substrate angle" ("Expose with Global Angle"):'''
*Rotation: 0 ±0.2°
*Centring:
*Centring:
** '''X''' 100±250µm
** '''X''' 0 ±100µm
** '''Y''' 200±250µm
** '''Y''' 0 ±100µm
The error on the flat alignment is surprising when compared to the 0±0.1° measured on Aligner: Maskless 01. The centring, on the other hand, is seen to be within a few hundred µm, without correcting for the flats.
Taran Sep 2023, average of 3 4" wafers.<br>


'''Result of loading the same substrate 2x9 times without removing it from the stage:'''
 
'''Result of loading the same substrate ~10 times without removing it from the stage:'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
|-
|-
Line 316: Line 184:
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Optical
|Optical autofocus
autofocus
| -4.7 mRad
| 3.7 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
| ±13.9 mRad
(±0.08°)
±0.


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Pneumatic
|Pneumatic autofocus
autofocus
| -2.8 mRad
| -3.1 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
| ±1.4 mRad
±0.08°
(±0.08°)


|}
|}
 
Measured after conversion to write mode 2 in 2023 by Taran Sep 2023.
This shows that using optical autofocus significantly increases the error on the flat measurement, while using pneumatic atuofocus performs similar to Aligner: Maskless 01. It is thus recommended to use pneumatic autofocus for the first print if crystal alignment is important for subsequent processing.
 
'''Result of using only the alignment tool, pushing it to the extremes:'''
 
-11.08 to 5.54mRad, corresponding to -0.6 to 0.3°, average -0.1±0.5° (6 measurements, including 2 without pushing the alignment tool). Measured using pneumatic autofocus. This should be compared to the ±1° crystal alignment spec of the SEMI wafer standard.
 
It would seem that applying the flat angle measured with optical autofocus to the print introduces more error than relying only on the alignment tool.


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />
Line 344: Line 203:
==Labeling==
==Labeling==


[[Image:MLA150_label.JPG|400x400px|thumb|An example of wafer ID produced by the labeling function]]
[[Image:MLA150_label.JPG|400x400px|thumb|An example of wafer ID produced by the labeling function. Photograph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.]]


The conversion manager software allows for inclusion of labels during the design conversion process. The labels are configured in a .lbl tab-delimited ASCII file with a special header in the first row, which must be located in the 'HIMT\Designs\Labels' folder. When used, the labels defined in the label file will be merged with the pattern in the source file, and the result can be inspected in the viewer. The X and Y positions of the labels should be given in design coordinates, and will be subject to any offsets/shifts applied to the design. Note, that if the label file is changed, the job file will not update automatically.
The conversion manager software allows for inclusion of labels during the design conversion process. The labels are configured in a .lbl tab-delimited ASCII file with a special header in the first row, which must be located in the 'HIMT\Designs_conversion_PC\Labels' folder. When used, the labels defined in the label file will be merged with the pattern in the source file, and the result can be inspected in the viewer. The X and Y positions of the labels should be given in design coordinates, and will be subject to any offsets/shifts applied to the design. Note, that if the label file is changed, the job file will not update automatically.


'''Example of a label file:'''
'''Example of a label file:'''
Line 354: Line 213:
-16000 | -46000 | um | 2000 | um | TARAN DTU Nanolab 20190320
-16000 | -46000 | um | 2000 | um | TARAN DTU Nanolab 20190320


This produces a 2mm high, approximately 32mm long wafer ID at the flat of a 4" wafer. Some special characters are not allowed (e.g. ';').
This produces a 2 mm high, approximately 32 mm long, wafer ID at the flat of a 100 mm wafer. Some special characters are not allowed (eg. ';').


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />
Line 360: Line 219:
==Large defocus range==
==Large defocus range==


The standard range for the defocus parameter is -10 to 10, but a special feature allows to extend this range to -25 to 25. The large defocus range feature is set in the resist template, and can only be accessed by choosing the 'NLAB Large defoc range' resist template during the job setup. The dose must be set manually, as this is an otherwise empty resist template. Also, this feature will work in the entire range for pneumatic focus, but it will likely fail at the extremes for optical focus.
The standard range for the defocus parameter is -10 to 10, but a special feature allows to extend this range to -25 to 25. The large defocus range feature is set in the resist template, and can only be accessed by choosing the 'Special - Large defoc range' resist template during the job setup. The dose must be set manually, as this is an otherwise empty resist template.
This feature works with both pneumatic and optical autofocus, in the full range for both.


Technically, it is possible to combine this feature with other features, such as high aspect ratio mode, but this requires that at custom resist template is set up by staff.
It is possible to combine this feature with other features, such as high aspect ratio mode.


==High Aspect Ratio (DOF) mode==
==High Aspect Ratio (DOF) mode==
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>


Aligner: Maskless 02 is configured with the so-called "Write Mode I", which uses a higher demagnification, higher NA lens system to achieve higher resolution. This reduces the depth of focus (technically ''depth of field''), making it more difficult to achieve good lithographic results in thicker resist coatings. The theoretical DOF of Aligner: Maskless 02 is 0.3µm, compared to 1µm for Aligner: Maskless 01. In order to improve processing of thick resists, the Aligner: Maskless 02 has been configured with the High Aspect Ratio Mode, which uses a variable aperture in the optical path to decrease the (illumination) NA of the system, thus increasing the DOF at the expense of intensity and resolution limit.
Aligner: Maskless 02 is configured with the so-called "Write Mode I", which uses a higher demagnification, higher NA lens system to achieve higher resolution. This reduces the depth of focus (technically ''depth of field''), making it more difficult to achieve good lithographic results in thicker resist coatings. The theoretical DOF of Aligner: Maskless 02 is 0.3µm, compared to 1µm for Aligner: Maskless 01 and Aligner: Maskless 03. In order to improve processing of thick resists, the Aligner: Maskless 02 has been configured with the High Aspect Ratio Mode, which uses a variable aperture in the optical path to decrease the (illumination) NA of the system, thus increasing the DOF at the expense of intensity and resolution limit.


[[Image:MLA150_intensityVSaperture.JPG|400x400px|thumb|The exposure intensity of Aligner: Maskless 02 as a function of the high AR mode aperture setting]]
[[Image:MLA150_intensityVSaperture.JPG|400x400px|thumb|The exposure intensity of Aligner: Maskless 02 as a function of the high AR mode aperture setting. Data and graph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.]]


The aperture size is controlled via a parameter in the resist template. The high AR parameter can be Standard (aperture fully open; 800 motor steps), Large (100 steps), or X-Large (60 steps).
The aperture size is controlled via a parameter in the resist template. The high AR parameter can be Standard (aperture fully open; 800 motor steps), Large (100 steps), or X-Large (60 steps).
Line 476: Line 337:
=Alignment=
=Alignment=


'''This section is under construction [[Image:section under construction.jpg|70px]]'''
'''Important information regarding alignment:'''
 
After alignment to the specified alignment marks, the Aligner: Maskless 02 will automatically compensate for the translation (shift) and rotation detected during the alignment. However, the translation is set using only the first alignment mark. This means that if there is any run-out (gain) in the wafer, the alignment will be perfect at the first alignment position, while the second alignment position will be off by the run-out error. The central part of the print will be misaligned by half the run-out error. This is different compared to alignment in a mask aligner, where the user usually splits the run-out error between the two sides, resulting in good alignment in the center. In Aligner: Maskless 02, run-out may be compensated by activating the scaling function, which only becomes available when using 3 or more alignment positions. To help assess whether the measured scaling or shearing is significant, 10 ppm (scaling = 1.000010 or 0.999990; shearing = ±0.010 mRad) corresponds to a difference of 1µm from one edge to the other on a 4" wafer.
 
In order to get good alignment, it is advised to use four alignment marks for alignment, and to activate scaling (possibly also shearing) before starting the exposure. Optical or pneumatic auto-focus should not affect the result, but it is recommended to use the "High Res" camera for the final alignment of each mark in order to achieve the best overlay accuracy. Exposure using the fast mode decreases the overlay accuracy, since the address grid size is increased to 250 nm.
 
<!-- AFTER THE CONVERSION TO WRITE MODE 2, this data is no longer relevant. TARAN 6/9-23
'''Alignment accuracy:'''
 
The alignment accuracy of the Aligner: Maskless 02 is a combination of the position accuracy of the stage, the accuracy of the alignment mark detection, the accuracy of the pattern already on the wafer (first print), and the calibration of the machine (correction of offset between the exposure light axis and the center of the cameras).
The calibration of the machine was performed during installation, but can also be corrected if systematic offsets are observed in alignment tests. This calibration also compensates errors in the detection of the alignment marks (at least on the standard samples used for calibration and alignment tests). By measuring the stitching accuracy between two layers printed on the same substrate (without unloading the substrate), we may be able to assess the stage accuracy. By aligning to a pattern previously exposed by the Aligner: Maskless 02, or ideally by another machine, we can assess the mask-less aligner's ability to compensate for any scaling (gain) and shearing (orthogonality) errors between the two prints.
 
The results reported here use printed verniers to assess the misalignment along the two axes at different points on the wafer using an optical microscope. Two different designs were used; a ±5µm vernier and a ±1µm vernier. Both consist of a scale of 4µm lines with 10µm pitch, and a vernier scale to enable subdivision of the 5µm or 1µm scale into tenths, i.e. 0.5µm or 0.1µm. During inspection, observation of the symmetry of neighboring lines enables the observer to read the shifts with ±0.25µm or ±0.05µm resolution.
 
The measurement data is used to calculate the misalignment of the second layer with respect to the first print. The median of all measurement points in X or Y (reported as "Misalignment") is a measure of the average overall offset between the first and second print, as seen in the raw data. This alignment error has three contributions: The translational error ("Translation") is the amount by which the image is shifted; the run-in/run-out error ("Run-out") is the amount of gain in the image; and the rotational error ("Rotation") is the angle by which the image is rotated. The unit of ppm (parts per million) is used for run-out and rotation, as these errors are generally small. A run-out of 1ppm corresponds to a shift of 50nm at the edge of a 4" wafer compared to the center, while a rotation of 1ppm corresponds to an angle of 0.2" (arcseconds) or a shift of 100nm across an entire 4" wafer. For comparison, the pixel size at the wafer surface is 160nm X 160nm, and the address grid size is 40nm.
 
For back side alignment tests, only the alignment marks are printed in the first print. The alignment error is then assessed by first printing the scale aligned to these marks, then rotating the wafer 180° and printing the vernier scale, again aligned to the marks. The alignment error is half of the observed misalignment between the verniers. As this is an indirect measurement of the alignment error, and only a few points are generally printed, only the misalignment is reported. The run-out and rotation are believed to be similar to the ones observed for top side alignment.
 
In advanced field alignment, the vernier scales in the second print are printed individually (as an array, rather than as one big image), and the position of each is corrected using local alignment to one mark. The rotation, scaling, and shearing is determined and set by global alignment marks, and is the same for each individual image. For these tests, run-out and rotation can not be assessed, and only the offset is reported. Any systematic error observed here is a measure of the offset between the exposure light axis and the center of the camera, and can be used to calibrate the machine.
 
The deviations (±) given for the results here are calculated as half the range of measurements. If the range is smaller than the measurement uncertainty, the measurement uncertainty is used in stead.
The samples used for these tests are 100mm Si wafers coated with a 1.5µm layer of positive tone resist (AZ 5214E or MiR 701).
 


[[Image:MLA150_stitching.JPG|400x400px|thumb|Data from the stage stitching test, representing a 60x60mm<sup>2</sup> area.]]
[[Image:MLA150_stitching.JPG|400x400px|thumb|Data from the stage stitching test, representing a 60mm x 60mm area.]]


'''Stage stitching test:'''
'''Stage stitching test (Taran Apr 2019):'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
|-
|-
Line 487: Line 370:
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
!colspan="2" align="center"|
!colspan="2" align="center"|
!Shift (median) [µm]
!Misalignment [µm]
!Misplacement [µm]
!Translation [µm]
!Run-out (gain) [ppm]
!Run-out [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
|-
|-
Line 495: Line 378:
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|9 points, 60x60mm<sup>2</sup>
|rowspan="2" align="center"|9 points, 60mm x 60mm
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| -0.15±0.05
| -0.15±0.05
Line 529: Line 412:
|}
|}


This test was performed by printing two layers on top of each other without unloading the substrate. There is on alignment performed, so it is a test of the stages ability to address the same spot twice. As can be seen in  
This test was performed by printing two layers on top of each other without unloading the substrate. There is no alignment performed, so it is a test of the stages ability to address the same spot twice. The first layer was a full 4" wafer, and was printed in ~½ hour. The second layer only consisted of alignment structures in a 5x5 grid, and printed in a few minutes.


The result shows significant misalignment between the two layers, higher than what is seen in true overlay tests. This is believed to be an effect of drift during the first, long print (most likely heating of the stage), as the misalignment is seen to be biggest between parts printed furthest apart in time (i.e. on the left side of the wafer). In a normal overlay print, this error can be at least partially compensated using the scaling and shearing function available for three or more alignment marks/positions.
-->
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


==Top Side Alignment==
==Top Side Alignment==
<!--
<span style="color:red">New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.</span>
-->


'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 0.5µm
'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' ±0.5 µm


'''Camera field of view (W x H):''' <br>
'''Camera field of view (W x H):''' <br>
'''High Res''' 64µm x 48µm <br>
'''High Res''' 190 µm x 140 µm <br>
'''Low Res''' 213µm x 160µm <br>
'''Low Res''' 640 µm x 480 µm <br>
'''Overview''' 13mm x 10mm
'''Overview''' 12 mm x 9 mm


'''Accessible stage coordinates:''' <br>
'''Accessible stage coordinates:''' <br>
'''High/Low Res''' X = ±108mm; Y = ±108mm <br>
'''High/Low Res''' X = ±108mm; Y = ±108mm <br>
'''Overview''' X = ±108mm; Y = +39mm to -180mm <br>
'''Overview''' X = ±108mm; Y = +39mm to -180mm <br>
To be sure the Overview camera can be used to locate the first alignment mark, it is advised to use a mark in the bottom left portion (3<sup>rd</sup> quadrant) of the design as mark 1. <br>
In order to be sure the Overview camera can be used to locate the first alignment mark, it is advised to use a mark in the bottom left portion (3<sup>rd</sup> quadrant) of the design as mark 1. <br>


{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 2px solid darkgray;" align="right"
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 2px solid darkgray;" align="center"
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  


|+'''Camera views during alignment on Aligner: Maskless 02. Screenshots by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.'''
|- border="0" align="center"
|- border="0" align="center"
|[[Image:MLA150 TSA Overview.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150 TSA Overview.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150_BSA_Backside.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150_TSA_Low_Res.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150_TSA_Low_Res.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150_TSA_High_Res.JPG|300px]]


|- align="center"
|- align="center"
| Overview camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.<br/> The circle is 3mm in diameter, the alignment mark is 300µm. The blue cross-hair is ~400µm. ||  Low Res camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.<br/> The lines of the cross are 20µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~7µm. || High Res camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.<br/> The lines of the central cross are 3µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~2µm.
| Overview camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.<br/> The circle is 3 mm in diameter, the alignment mark is 300 µm. The blue cross-hair is ~400 µm. ||  Low Res camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.<br/> The mark is 300 µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~18 µm. || High Res camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.<br/> The lines of the cross are 20 µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~7 µm.


|}
|}


<br clear="all" />


'''Alignment test''' (unless otherwise stated, these tests use 375nm laser, High Res camera, and Quality exposure)
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
|-
|-
Line 571: Line 463:
!Scaling [ppm]
!Scaling [ppm]
!Shearing [mRad]
!Shearing [mRad]
!Shift (median) [µm]
!Misalignment [µm]
!Misplacement [µm]
!Run-out [ppm]
!Run-out (gain) [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
|-
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
| 6
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.004
| -0.5±0.08
| -0.3±1.7
| 0.6±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| 9
| -0.3±0.08
| 1.1±1.7
| -1.1±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
'''Low Res camera'''
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
| 5
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.004
| -0.95±0.13
| -1.1±2.5
| -0.8±1.3
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| 7
| 0.1±0.1
| -1.1±1.7
| -0.8±2.5
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
'''Fast exposure'''
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
| 7
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.003
| -0.65±0.05
| -0.6±1.7
| 0.3±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| 8
| -0.25±0.05
| 0.3±1.7
| -0.3±1.2
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|'''2''' alignment marks
(Taran Apr 2023)
|'''X'''
|NA
|rowspan="2"|NA
| -0.75±0.3
| -8.9±1.7
| -1.4±2.5
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| NA
| -0.55±0.28
| -6.1±2.5
| -0.8±1.2
<!--


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|2 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|2 alignment marks
375nm, high res camera
 
(Taran Apr 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
|NA
|NA
|rowspan="2"|NA
|rowspan="2"|NA
| 0.25±0.15
| 0.25±0.15
| 0.25±0.05
| 1.7±1.7
| 1.7±1.7
| 2.2±1.3
| 2.2±1.3
Line 594: Line 569:
| NA
| NA
| 0.3±0.13
| 0.3±0.13
| 0.29±0.05
| 0.8±1.7
| 0.8±1.7
| 0.0±1.7
| 0.0±1.7
Line 601: Line 575:
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
375nm, high res camera
 
(Taran Apr 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| -1
| -1
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.001
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.001
| 0.2±0.05
| 0.2±0.05
| 0.17±0.05
| -0.6±1.7
| -0.6±1.7
| 0.3±1.2
| 0.3±1.2
Line 615: Line 589:
| -1
| -1
| 0.4±0.05
| 0.4±0.05
| 0.42±0.05
| 0.6±1.7
| 0.6±1.7
| 0.6±1.2
| 0.6±1.2
Line 622: Line 595:
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
375nm, low res camera
Low Res camera
 
(Taran Apr 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| -6
| -6
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.002
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.002
| -0.05±0.13
| -0.05±0.13
| -0.06±0.05
| -1.9±1.7
| -1.9±1.7
| 0.8±1.3
| 0.8±1.3
Line 635: Line 609:
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| -2
| -2
| 0.3±0.05
| 0.3±0.05
| 0.3±0.05
| -0.6±1.7
| -0.6±1.7
| 1.1±1.7
| 1.1±1.7


-->
|}
|}


'''Scaled first print:'''
<!--
'''Alignment test with scaled first print'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:center;"  
|-
|-
Line 651: Line 626:
!Scaling [ppm]
!Scaling [ppm]
!Shearing [mRad]
!Shearing [mRad]
!Shift (median) [µm]
!Misalignment [µm]
!Misplacement [µm]
!Translation [µm]
!Run-out (gain) [ppm]
!Run-out [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
!Rotation [ppm]
|-
|-
Line 661: Line 636:
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
375nm, high res camera
375nm, high res camera
(Taran Mar 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| 100
| 100
Line 682: Line 659:
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
|rowspan="2"|4 alignment marks
375nm, high res camera
375nm, high res camera
(Taran Mar 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| not used
| not used
Line 700: Line 679:


|}
|}
-->


==Back Side Alignment==
==Back Side Alignment==


[[Image:MLA150_BSA_Backside.JPG|300x300px|thumb|Image of a BSA alignment mark during alignment. The mark is 300µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~18µm. ]]
'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' ±1 µm


'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 1.0µm
'''BSA windows:''' along the X and Y axes, 10 mm wide x 46 mm long, starting 14.5 mm from the center.


'''BSA windows:''' along the X and Y axes, 10mm x 46mm, starting 14.5mm from the center.
'''Camera field of view (W x H):''' 640 µm x 480 µm


'''Camera field of view (W x H):''' 640µm x 480µm
[[Image:MLA150_BSA_Backside.JPG|center|300px|thumb|Image of a BSA alignment mark during alignment. The mark is 300 µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~18 µm. Screenshot by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.]]
<br clear="all" />
 
 
The alignment marks must be placed within the BSA windows. The Overview camera only shows the top side of the substrate, and cannot be used to locate the BSA marks.


{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 2px solid darkgray;" align="right"
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 2px solid darkgray;" align="center"
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  
! width="320" |  
Line 718: Line 700:
! width="320" |
! width="320" |


|+'''Substrate view during backside alignment. Screenshots by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.'''
|- border="0" align="center"
|- border="0" align="center"
|[[Image:MLA150 BSA 2inch.JPG|300px]]
|[[Image:MLA150 BSA 2inch.JPG|300px]]
Line 728: Line 711:


|}
|}
<br clear="all" />




'''Backside alignment test:'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
|-
|-
Line 736: Line 721:
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
!colspan="2" align="center"|
!colspan="2" align="center"|
!Offset (median) [µm]
!Misalignment [µm]
!Comment
!Comment
|-
|-
Line 742: Line 727:
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Align-flip180-align, 3 points <br/> 375nm
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Align - flip 180° - align<br>3 point average
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| -0.625±0.125
| -0.625 ±0.125
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.5µm verniers, May 2019
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.5 µm verniers
Taran May 2019


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| -0.75±0.125
| -0.75 ±0.125


<!--
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Align-flip180-align, 3 points <br/> 405nm
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Align-flip180-align, 3 points <br/> 405 nm
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| -0.625±0.125
| -0.625 ±0.125
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.5µm verniers, May 2019
|rowspan="2" align="center"|0.5 µm verniers
Taran May 2019


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| -0.375±0.125
| -0.375 ±0.125


|-
|-
Line 768: Line 756:
|rowspan="2" align="center"|KOH-window, ? points
|rowspan="2" align="center"|KOH-window, ? points
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| 0.0±0.0
| 0.0 ±0.0
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Not performed yet
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Not performed yet
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| 0.0±0.0
| 0.0 ±0.0
 
-->
|}
|}


Line 781: Line 769:
==Advanced Field alignment (TSA)==
==Advanced Field alignment (TSA)==


'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 0.25µm (5x5mm<sup>2</sup> area)
'''Overlay accuracy (spec):''' 0.25 µm (5x5 mm<sup>2</sup> area)


Shift, rotation, scaling, and shearing is determined and set by global alignment marks. The shift is corrected by automatic alignment to one mark in each field (chip).
Shift, rotation, scaling, and shearing is determined and set by global alignment marks. The shift is corrected locally by automatic alignment to one mark in each field (chip).


'''Advanced field alignment test:'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="text-align:left;"  
|-
|-
Line 791: Line 780:
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
!colspan="2" align="center"|
!colspan="2" align="center"|
!Shift (median) [nm]
!Median [nm]
!Error (average) [nm]
!Average [nm]
|-
|-


Line 798: Line 787:
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|25 fields
|rowspan="2" align="center"|25 fields
375nm, high res camera
375 nm, high res camera
 
(Taran Sept 2023)
|'''X'''
| -450 ±75
| -438 ±75
 
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
| -200 ±50
| -212 ±50
 
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|25 fields
375 nm, high res camera
 
(Taran Mar 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| 50±75
| 50 ±75
| 70±75
| 70 ±75


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| 150±50
| 150 ±50
| 128±50
| 128 ±50
 
<!--


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Scaled first print, 10 fields
|rowspan="2" align="center"|Scaled first print, 10 fields
375nm, high res camera
375 nm, high res camera
 
(Taran Mar 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| -25±50
| -25 ±50
| -5±50
| -5 ±50


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| 100±50
| 100 ±50
| 120±50
| 120 ±50


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|rowspan="2" align="center"|25 fields
|rowspan="2" align="center"|25 fields
405nm, high res camera
405 nm, high res camera
 
(Taran Mar 2019)
|'''X'''
|'''X'''
| 100±75
| 100 ±75
| 108±75
| 108 ±75


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|'''Y'''
|'''Y'''
| 0±50
| 0 ±50
| 16±50
| 16 ±50
 
-->
|}
|}


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />

Latest revision as of 09:24, 7 March 2024

This section, including all images and pictures, is created by DTU Nanolab staff unless otherwise stated.

Feedback to this page: click here

Exposure technology

Aligner: Maskless 02 is not a direct writer. In the maskless aligner, the exposure light is passed through a spatial light modulator, much like in a video projector, and projected onto the substrate, exposing a small area of the design at a time. The substrate is fully exposed by scanning the exposure field across the substrate in a succession of exposure stripes.

The light source is a laser diode (array) with a wavelength of 375 nm (2.8 W). The spatial light modulator is a digital micro-mirror device. The individual mirrors of the DMD are switched on and off in order to represent the design, and the laser is flashed on and off, in order to give the desired exposure dose. The exposure image is projected onto the substrate through a lens-system. The projected image has a pixel size of 500x500 nm on the substrate surface. The image is scanned across the substrate in stripes in order to expose the entire design. Each stripe is overlapping 2 or 5 times, depending on the chosen exposure mode), in order to reduce light-source non-uniformity effects and stitching errors. The address grid size is 250 nm or 100 nm for Fast and High Quality exposure mode, respectively.

The writing head of the Aligner: Maskless 02 moves only in the z-direction. Using the optical or pneumatic focusing system, the maskless aligner is able to do real-time dynamic autofocus. The defocus process parameter is used to offset the focusing mechanism, to optimize printing quality in different resists and resist thicknesses, as well as reflective or absorbing surfaces, and transparent or non-transparent substrates. The stage of the Aligner: Maskless 02 moves only in x and y. It has no theta-axis. All rotation during alignment is accomplished by digitally rotating the design to match the physical rotation of the substrate.

Process Parameters

The lithographic result of exposure on Aligner: Maskless 02 depends on a lot of factors, including the dose and defocus parameters, and the exposure mode used. The optimal dose and defocus depends on the type and thickness of the resist, as well as the optical properties of the substrate (e.g. reflective/absorbing/transparent). All of these factors influence the obtainable resolution, as well as the writing speed.

The correct way to determine the best dose-defocus settings is to generate a so-called Bossung plot (known from projection lithography), which plots the printed linewidth as a function of dose and defocus. From this, the most stable region of parameter space is chosen, i.e. the region where the linewidth changes the least when dose and defocus changes. Any deviation from the design linewidth may be corrected using the CD bias parameter. This typically involves SEM imaging of resist cross-sections, and quickly becomes time-consuming. However, in most cases, inspection of a dose-defocus matrix (easily generated using the series exposure function) in an optical microscope will get you most of the way.


Exposure dose and defocus

Information on UV exposure dose

Aligner: Maskless 02 offers two autofocus modes; optical or pneumatic. The autofocus mode is selected via the substrate template. The defocus process parameter is used to compensate for offsets between the autofocus mechanism and the focal point of the exposure light, and simultaneously optimize print quality in different resists and varying thicknesses.

Optical:

Works for substrates down to 3x3 mm.

Pneumatic:

Substrates must be at least 5x5 mm to be successfully loaded. The pneumatic AF freezes at a distance of 3 mm form the substrate edge, which means that in order to have any dynamic focusing, using the pneumatic AF, the substrate must be larger than 6x6 mm. When using the pneumatic autofocus, we recommend a substrate size of at least 20x20 mm.

Exposure mode

Aligner: Maskless 02 offers two exposure modes. The exposure mode is selected during design conversion.

High quality:

High quality mode is used for minimum stitching effects.
In the high quality mode, an area of the pattern is exposed by 5 stripes, each 500 µm wide and exposing a fifth of the dose. At the same time, sub-pixel interpolation is applied, giving an address grid size of 100 nm.

Fast:

Fast mode is used for maximum exposure speed.
In the fast mode, each area of the pattern is exposed by 2 stripes only. This effectively reduces the exposure time by 60%, but also increases the size of the address grid in the X-direction to 250 nm. Due to less averaging of non-uniformities, stitching effects will be more prominent in this mode.

Writing speed

(This section was updated 05-09-2023 by taran@nanolab)

According to specs (after being converted to write mode 2), the writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 is 500 mm2/min in fast mode. Using the high quality exposure mode cuts the expected speed by 2.5, to approximately 200 mm2/min. The writing speed of the machine for a 100x100 mm2 area measured after being modified to write mode 2 (2023-03-21) was ~1200 mm2/min at 100 mJ/cm2.

When the exposure is started on the maskless aligner, the software starts converting the design to the image files needed for the exposure. When sufficient data has been generated, the hardware starts exposing the sample, while more image data is being generated in the background. This simultaneous data conversion and exposure is called Online conversion. Once a design has been converted (and/or exposed) the data may be reused for repeated exposures. Due to no time lost waiting for data conversion, offline exposure may be several tens of % faster than online. However, the converted data can only be reused if no alignment is needed, including flat alignment ("Expose with substrate angle"/"Expose with Global Angle").


The writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 (fast mode, 375nm, 100 mJ/cm2) as function of the exposure area. Data and graph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2023.

Speed vs. area:

During exposure of a stripe the stage moves at a constant speed. Each stripe thus includes a certain movement overhead for acceleration and deceleration. As the stripes get shorter, this overhead becomes more significant, and the normal writing speed is no longer achieved. For smaller samples, the writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 drops below the specified writing speed for a full 100 x 100 mm substrate.


The writing speed of Aligner: Maskless 02 (fast mode, 375nm) as function of the exposure dose. The exposure speed was measured using a 10 mm x 100 mm exposure area, but should be approximately the same for a full 100 mm wafer exposure. Data and graph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2023.

Speed vs. dose:

The writing speed is constant up to a dose of 100 mJ/cm2, then drops with increasing dose. At 500 mJ/cm2, the writing speed is approximately the nominal speed of 500 mm2/min. As a rule of thumb, the writing time doubles every time the dose is doubled.


Speed vs. design:

Depending on the complexity and density of the pattern, the conversion process may slow down the exposure significantly. A 100 mm wafer exposed with a pattern consisting of 200 million 5 µm circles took more than 16 minutes (600 mm2/min), compared to the expected 8-9 minutes (1200 mm2/min). It took 6.5 minutes before the first stripe was exposed, and there were several pauses during the print (waiting for data from conversion). Even a simple 100 x 100 mm square takes 1.5 minutes to start printing, lowering the effective writing speed to 1000 mm2/min.

The maskless aligner exposes the design in north-south oriented stripes (perpendicular to the flat). The stripes all have the same length, set by the height of the design, and only completely empty stripes are skipped. The writing speed may thus be affected by the layout of the design, as shown below.

Design case: Five 100 µm wide, 40 mm long lines, spaced 10 mm apart (40x40 mm2). Data and graphics by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019-2023.
This design printed in 2.5 minutes (640 mm2/min) This design printed in less than 1 minute (1780 mm2/min)



Features

Substrate centring and flat alignment

During substrate detection, the sample is scanned along the X- and Y-axes, as well as diagonally. From these measurements, the size (diameter) of the substrate is calculated, as well as the stage position matching the center of the substrate. This stage position will be the default origin for the subsequent exposure.

At the end of substrate detection, the sample is scanned twice along the bottom edge (flat), in order to determine the substrate rotation. This angle will be presented in the exposure panel along with the option to expose the design rotated in order to compensate for this angle, i.e. aligned to the flat/edge of the substrate.


Result of using "Expose with substrate angle" ("Expose with Global Angle"):

  • Rotation: 0 ±0.2°
  • Centring:
    • X 0 ±100µm
    • Y 0 ±100µm

Taran Sep 2023, average of 3 4" wafers.


Result of loading the same substrate ~10 times without removing it from the stage:

Average Range
Optical autofocus -4.7 mRad ±1.4 mRad

(±0.08°)

Pneumatic autofocus -2.8 mRad ±1.4 mRad

(±0.08°)

Measured after conversion to write mode 2 in 2023 by Taran Sep 2023.


Labeling

An example of wafer ID produced by the labeling function. Photograph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.

The conversion manager software allows for inclusion of labels during the design conversion process. The labels are configured in a .lbl tab-delimited ASCII file with a special header in the first row, which must be located in the 'HIMT\Designs_conversion_PC\Labels' folder. When used, the labels defined in the label file will be merged with the pattern in the source file, and the result can be inspected in the viewer. The X and Y positions of the labels should be given in design coordinates, and will be subject to any offsets/shifts applied to the design. Note, that if the label file is changed, the job file will not update automatically.

Example of a label file:

X | Y | UNIT | HEIGHT | UNIT | TITLE

-16000 | -46000 | um | 2000 | um | TARAN DTU Nanolab 20190320

This produces a 2 mm high, approximately 32 mm long, wafer ID at the flat of a 100 mm wafer. Some special characters are not allowed (eg. ';').


Large defocus range

The standard range for the defocus parameter is -10 to 10, but a special feature allows to extend this range to -25 to 25. The large defocus range feature is set in the resist template, and can only be accessed by choosing the 'Special - Large defoc range' resist template during the job setup. The dose must be set manually, as this is an otherwise empty resist template. This feature works with both pneumatic and optical autofocus, in the full range for both.

It is possible to combine this feature with other features, such as high aspect ratio mode.

High Aspect Ratio (DOF) mode

New specs after the new writehead has been installed - section will be updated soon.

Aligner: Maskless 02 is configured with the so-called "Write Mode I", which uses a higher demagnification, higher NA lens system to achieve higher resolution. This reduces the depth of focus (technically depth of field), making it more difficult to achieve good lithographic results in thicker resist coatings. The theoretical DOF of Aligner: Maskless 02 is 0.3µm, compared to 1µm for Aligner: Maskless 01 and Aligner: Maskless 03. In order to improve processing of thick resists, the Aligner: Maskless 02 has been configured with the High Aspect Ratio Mode, which uses a variable aperture in the optical path to decrease the (illumination) NA of the system, thus increasing the DOF at the expense of intensity and resolution limit.

The exposure intensity of Aligner: Maskless 02 as a function of the high AR mode aperture setting. Data and graph by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.

The aperture size is controlled via a parameter in the resist template. The high AR parameter can be Standard (aperture fully open; 800 motor steps), Large (100 steps), or X-Large (60 steps).

  • Standard: No resist template or any normal resist template
  • Large: 'NLAB High AR mode Large'
  • X-Large: 'NLAB High AR mode XL'

Assuming a linear relation between motor steps and aperture diameter, Large corresponds to a relative aperture area of 1.6%, while X-Large corresponds to 0.6% aperture area. Intensity measurements show a relative intensity of approximately 25%, and 6%, respectively. The effective dose can be corrected by increasing the nominal dose in the exposure, either by a fixed machine parameter, or by the user setting a higher dose themselves. At the moment, the user will be required to increase the nominal dose.

Decreasing the aperture size significantly reduces the amount of light that reaches the sample, and thus the effective dose, as can be seen in the graph to the right, and the table below. The resolution limit, however, seem to be much less affected. Tests using 1.5µm MiR resist suggest that using the X-Large setting (60 steps) reduces the achievable resolution from 1µm at Standard setting to 3µm for exposure at 375nm, but only to 1.75µm for exposure at 405nm.

Dose factor for different wavelengths and aperture settings:

375nm 405nm
Large (100) X-Large (60) Large (100) X-Large (60)
Intensity measurements 3.3 17.4 5.7 14.6
150µm SU-8 acceptance test ~3 ~10 NA NA
1.5µm AZ MiR 701 dose test 7.5 20.8 6.7 18.0
10µm AZ 4562 dose test ? ? ? ?


Results from acceptance test on 150µm thick SU-8:

Pillars Rings
Standard (800)

6000 mJ/cm2

Large (100)

16500 mJ/cm2

X-Large (60)

55000 mJ/cm2


Alignment

Important information regarding alignment:

After alignment to the specified alignment marks, the Aligner: Maskless 02 will automatically compensate for the translation (shift) and rotation detected during the alignment. However, the translation is set using only the first alignment mark. This means that if there is any run-out (gain) in the wafer, the alignment will be perfect at the first alignment position, while the second alignment position will be off by the run-out error. The central part of the print will be misaligned by half the run-out error. This is different compared to alignment in a mask aligner, where the user usually splits the run-out error between the two sides, resulting in good alignment in the center. In Aligner: Maskless 02, run-out may be compensated by activating the scaling function, which only becomes available when using 3 or more alignment positions. To help assess whether the measured scaling or shearing is significant, 10 ppm (scaling = 1.000010 or 0.999990; shearing = ±0.010 mRad) corresponds to a difference of 1µm from one edge to the other on a 4" wafer.

In order to get good alignment, it is advised to use four alignment marks for alignment, and to activate scaling (possibly also shearing) before starting the exposure. Optical or pneumatic auto-focus should not affect the result, but it is recommended to use the "High Res" camera for the final alignment of each mark in order to achieve the best overlay accuracy. Exposure using the fast mode decreases the overlay accuracy, since the address grid size is increased to 250 nm.


Top Side Alignment

Overlay accuracy (spec): ±0.5 µm

Camera field of view (W x H):
High Res 190 µm x 140 µm
Low Res 640 µm x 480 µm
Overview 12 mm x 9 mm

Accessible stage coordinates:
High/Low Res X = ±108mm; Y = ±108mm
Overview X = ±108mm; Y = +39mm to -180mm
In order to be sure the Overview camera can be used to locate the first alignment mark, it is advised to use a mark in the bottom left portion (3rd quadrant) of the design as mark 1.

Camera views during alignment on Aligner: Maskless 02. Screenshots by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.
Overview camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.
The circle is 3 mm in diameter, the alignment mark is 300 µm. The blue cross-hair is ~400 µm.
Low Res camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.
The mark is 300 µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~18 µm.
High Res camera image of a TSA alignment mark during alignment.
The lines of the cross are 20 µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~7 µm.



Alignment test (unless otherwise stated, these tests use 375nm laser, High Res camera, and Quality exposure)

MLA-MLA Scaling [ppm] Shearing [mRad] Misalignment [µm] Run-out [ppm] Rotation [ppm]
4 alignment marks

(Taran Apr 2023)

X 6 0.004 -0.5±0.08 -0.3±1.7 0.6±1.2
Y 9 -0.3±0.08 1.1±1.7 -1.1±1.2
4 alignment marks

Low Res camera

(Taran Apr 2023)

X 5 0.004 -0.95±0.13 -1.1±2.5 -0.8±1.3
Y 7 0.1±0.1 -1.1±1.7 -0.8±2.5
4 alignment marks

Fast exposure

(Taran Apr 2023)

X 7 0.003 -0.65±0.05 -0.6±1.7 0.3±1.2
Y 8 -0.25±0.05 0.3±1.7 -0.3±1.2
2 alignment marks

(Taran Apr 2023)

X NA NA -0.75±0.3 -8.9±1.7 -1.4±2.5
Y NA -0.55±0.28 -6.1±2.5 -0.8±1.2


Back Side Alignment

Overlay accuracy (spec): ±1 µm

BSA windows: along the X and Y axes, 10 mm wide x 46 mm long, starting 14.5 mm from the center.

Camera field of view (W x H): 640 µm x 480 µm

Image of a BSA alignment mark during alignment. The mark is 300 µm wide. The blue cross-hair is ~18 µm. Screenshot by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.


The alignment marks must be placed within the BSA windows. The Overview camera only shows the top side of the substrate, and cannot be used to locate the BSA marks.

Substrate view during backside alignment. Screenshots by Thomas Anhøj @ DTU Nanolab, 2019.
BSA marks positionned at x = ±20mm on a 2" wafer BSA marks positionned at x = ±40mm on a 4" wafer BSA marks positionned at x = ±50mm on a 6" wafer BSA marks positionned at x = ±50mm on an 8" wafer



Backside alignment test:

Misalignment [µm] Comment
Align - flip 180° - align
3 point average
X -0.625 ±0.125 0.5 µm verniers

Taran May 2019

Y -0.75 ±0.125


Advanced Field alignment (TSA)

Overlay accuracy (spec): 0.25 µm (5x5 mm2 area)

Shift, rotation, scaling, and shearing is determined and set by global alignment marks. The shift is corrected locally by automatic alignment to one mark in each field (chip).

Advanced field alignment test:

Median [nm] Average [nm]
25 fields

375 nm, high res camera

(Taran Sept 2023)

X -450 ±75 -438 ±75
Y -200 ±50 -212 ±50
25 fields

375 nm, high res camera

(Taran Mar 2019)

X 50 ±75 70 ±75
Y 150 ±50 128 ±50