May 2016 Survey

From LabAdviser
Revision as of 09:30, 17 August 2016 by Meno (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Survey introduction

The May 2016 survey was the 14th survey carried out using a format where individual cleanroom users were asked about their view on various parts of using DTU Danchip's facilities and in particular the cleanroom facilities.

The questionnaire was send to 366 registered users (based on the logging of cleanroom use) unfortunately 13 of the e-mail adresses was obsolete and thus the mails bounced, which brought the total number of potential answers to 353 . In total 36 persons answered the questionnaire which means an answer fraction of 10%.

This page deals with the comments given as part of the questionnaire. Danchip values this feedback highly.

Comments

The comments appear here as they were written in the feedback field of the questionnaire. In a few cases they have been anonymized or the worst spelling mistakes corrected.

Comment 1

To many machines are out of use, and the information level concerning when they will work again are usually not existing.

Action:

Comment 2

It is the first time that I can work in a cleanroom environment and I am very satisfied of the whole organization.

Action:

Comment 3

Everyone in cleanroom is helpful.

Action:

Comment 4

E-beam is heavily booked. Information on cleanroom closure on alarm is sometimes late or non arriving, which is annoying when your are not located at 34-something.

Action:

Comment 5

Overall, I think I am satisfied with DTU Danchip and DTU Cen's service. The facilities you maintained and provided for us can meet our basic characterization demand. You can also give a good training for beginners. In the near future, I wish that you can provide EDS-mapping function on Tecnai T20 G2 or Quanta FEG 200 ESEM, since this is a very popular method to acknowledge element distribution in samples. Additionally I also hope that you can keep using high-level CCD attached to all microscopes.

Action:

Comment 6

Ingen hands-on erfaringer so far, men alt så overskueligt ud.

Action:

Comment 7

There are consistently quite a few systems being in limited or out of use, sometimes stopping production for several weeks and thus being extremely expensive for commercial users of the cleanroom. If this is for some reason unavoidable, then a simple backup plan for such situations would be nice. Considering that Danchip is close to a monopoly when it comes to cleanroom facilities in Denmark, the flexibility and willingness to serve customers is at times very limited, and in some situations even arrogant, e.g. "take it or leave it" offers or "you are here for us, not the other way around" attitude. Another example is the "yellow poster" at the entrance to the cleanroom which almost threatens cleanroom users - is that really how you would like to greet your customers when they enter your facility? With many startups from DTU these years, it would be a good idea with a more flexible pricing system. Currently, Danchip presents a major barrier for spin-out companies trying to enter the semiconductor market, by demanding very high prices on e.g. floor space and time spent in the cleanroom. It would make sense for both spin-outs, Danchip and DTU to have some sort of spin-out discount. In some situations equipment is changed/moved with very little notice. Perhaps targeted customer information should be considered. E.g. check who is actually using the equipment frequently (by looking in labmanager) and then inform them specifically in case of changes. The staff helpfulness in general is, as always, brilliant :-).

Action:

Comment 8

The torrent of spam-mail fra Danchip users is still a major pain that has not been addressed. Every time someone deletes a booking or finishes early, the entire Danchip user list receives an mail, despite it being pure spam to 99% of recipients. This also means that vital information from Danchip is often overlooked, as it drowns in the sea of irrelevant email. This almost caused us to lose >100.000 DKK worth of chemicals in a cleaning raid, as our entire group had overlooked the email warnings regarding the cleaning, because of the extremely low signal-to-noise ratio of the email list. One wonders how much other important information is missed by Danchip users because of this issue. It would seem possible to send out "I finished early"-emails etc. via LabManager, so that only those who have training for and interest in the equipment in question gets notified. This would alleviate a major frustration for most Danchip customers, and increase safety in the cleanroom, by reducing the risk of critically important information being overlooked in the torrent of "I deleted my booking"-spam.

Action: