Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/FAQ/Masks: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/FAQ/Masks click here]'''
<!--Checked for updates on 2/10-2020 - ok/jmli -->
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
'''Feedback to this page:
[mailto:plasma@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/DRIE-Pegasus/FAQ/Masks click here]'''


; Question 1
; Question 1

Revision as of 14:27, 2 October 2020

Feedback to this page: click here



Question 1
I remember you said that you don't like Al as masking material because it will get sputtered off (am I right?) - but what about ALD deposited aluminium oxide - it is, as far as I know, much harder and resistant than Al..?
Answer 1
We don't have experience with ALD deposited aluminium oxide as a mask, however for some ESC configurations we have seen evidence of sputtering of the alumina uniformity shield surrounding the wafer; this would lead me to believe that the ALD aluminium oxide could still sputter and cause contamination issues.

Source: Kerry Roberts, SPTS