Specific Process Knowledge/Thin film deposition/Deposition of Aluminium: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|1Å/s to 5Å/s | |1Å/s to 5Å/s | ||
|10Å/s to 15Å/s | |10Å/s to 15Å/s | ||
|~2.5 Å/s | |Depending on process parameters (see [[/Sputter rates for Al|here]]), up to ~2.5 Å/s | ||
|~8Å/s to 15Å/s | |~8Å/s to 15Å/s | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 10:44, 29 August 2008
Aluminium can be deposited by e-beam evaporation, by sputter and by thermal evaporation. In the chart below you can compare the different methods on the different deposition equipment.
E-beam evaporation (Alcatel) | E-beam evaporation (Leybold) | E-beam evaporation (Wordentec) | Sputter deposition (Wordentec) | Thermal evaporation (Wordentec) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batch size |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-clean | RF Ar clean | Ar ion bombartment | RF Ar clean | RF Ar clean | RF Ar clean |
Layer thickness | 10Å to 1µm | 10Å to 1500 Å | 10Å to 1 µm | 10Å to ~0.5µm (very time consuming ) | 10Å to 0.5 µm (this uses all Al in the boat) |
Deposition rate | 2Å/s to 15Å/s | 1Å/s to 5Å/s | 10Å/s to 15Å/s | Depending on process parameters (see here), up to ~2.5 Å/s | ~8Å/s to 15Å/s |
Aluminium deposition on ZEP520A for lift-off
This is a small study of which aluminium deposition that is best for aluminium lift-off on ZEP520A resist and a very thin layer of aluminium (~20nm).
The conclusion was that e-beam evaporation of aluminium in the Alcatel at 15Å/s gave the best result.
See details of the study here