Specific Process Knowledge/Thin film deposition/Lesker: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:


This study was then done on 30 nm Ni<math>_{81}</math>Fe<math>_{19}</math> thin films deposited on 3 nm Ta on top of a SiO<math>_2</math> substrate, using R and AMR as an indication of strain. As seen in the tables, applying a substrate bias increases AMR and conductance (1/R). An equivalent effect is seen when heating the substrate during deposition. This heating can also be done after deposition without loosing the effect.
This study was then done on 30 nm Ni<math>_{81}</math>Fe<math>_{19}</math> thin films deposited on 3 nm Ta on top of a SiO<math>_2</math> substrate, using R and AMR as an indication of strain. As seen in the tables, applying a substrate bias increases AMR and conductance (1/R). An equivalent effect is seen when heating the substrate during deposition. This heating can also be done after deposition without loosing the effect.
{| {{table}} border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8"
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Name'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Substrate bias (W)'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''AMR'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''1/R (S)'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Crystal strain'''
|-
| 0029 NiFe3_stack_RF20||20||0.02724278||1.308044474||
|-
| 0018_NiFe1_stack_RF||10||0.025850358||0.898311175||
|-
| 0030 NiFe3_stack||0||0.020103598||0.71772052||0.8
|-
|}
{| {{table}} border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8"
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Name'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Temperature (C)'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''AMR'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''1/R (S)'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Crystal strain'''
|-
| 0030 NiFe3_stack||25||0.020103598||0.71772052||0.8
|-
| BDT-NiFe1-blank30||200||0.019319002||1.095770327||
|-
| BTD-NiFe-Blank22||250||0.021768497||1.047668937||
|-
| BTD-NiFe-Blank14||300||0.02983617||1.724137931||
|-
| BTD-NiFe-Blank13||350||0.033944331||1.887504719||
|-
| BTD-NiFe-Blank15||400||0.031176801||1.655903295||0.2
|-
| BTD-NiFe-Blank16||450||0.030843457||||
|-
|
|}

Revision as of 14:26, 9 November 2009

Film quality optimization

By Bjarke Thomas Dalslet @Nanotech.dtu.dk

The Lesker CMS 18 sputter system can produce films in a wide range of qualities. The quality of a film depends strongly on the substrate (lattice matching), but also on the energy the sputtered material can utilize for annealing.

Strain estimations was done on 30 nm NiFe thin films using low angle x-ray diffraction, for various substrates. It was found that the strain of the film influenced the resistance (R) and anisotropic magneto resistance (AMR) of the films (this relationship is also documented in literature); A Ta interface layer reduced R and increased AMR on both Si and SiO substrates while reducing strain.

This study was then done on 30 nm NiFe thin films deposited on 3 nm Ta on top of a SiO substrate, using R and AMR as an indication of strain. As seen in the tables, applying a substrate bias increases AMR and conductance (1/R). An equivalent effect is seen when heating the substrate during deposition. This heating can also be done after deposition without loosing the effect.

Name Substrate bias (W) AMR 1/R (S) Crystal strain
0029 NiFe3_stack_RF20 20 0.02724278 1.308044474
0018_NiFe1_stack_RF 10 0.025850358 0.898311175
0030 NiFe3_stack 0 0.020103598 0.71772052 0.8


Name Temperature (C) AMR 1/R (S) Crystal strain
0030 NiFe3_stack 25 0.020103598 0.71772052 0.8
BDT-NiFe1-blank30 200 0.019319002 1.095770327
BTD-NiFe-Blank22 250 0.021768497 1.047668937
BTD-NiFe-Blank14 300 0.02983617 1.724137931
BTD-NiFe-Blank13 350 0.033944331 1.887504719
BTD-NiFe-Blank15 400 0.031176801 1.655903295 0.2
BTD-NiFe-Blank16 450 0.030843457