Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/ICP Metal Etcher/silicon/nano: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jmli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@danchip.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.danchip.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/ICP_Metal_Etcher/silicon/nano click here]'''  
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Etch/ICP_Metal_Etcher/silicon/nano click here]'''  
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
<!--Checked for updates on 30/7-2018 - ok/jmli -->
 
<!--Checked for updates on 5/10-2020 - ok/jmli -->


== Etching of nanostructures in silicon ==
== Etching of nanostructures in silicon ==

Revision as of 07:33, 5 October 2020

Feedback to this page: click here

Etching of nanostructures in silicon

A series of experiments with etching nanostructures in silicon has been carried out. The common process parameters are:

Substrates
A pattern containing 30 nm, 60 nm, 90 nm, 120 nm and 150 nm wide lines has been transferred using E-beam lithography onto three separate batches of 2" wafers (with three different thicknesses of zep resist). In order to make sure that the narrowest features are fully opened they are intentionally over-exposed in the E-beam writer (400 muC/cm2) causing the lines to widen. The resist profiles of the three batches are:

The exposed area is very small. The 211 nm batch has the same lines distributed in a different way that allows you monitor the progress of the etch in three different durations by cleaving off a piece of the wafer 3 times. After E-beam exposure the wafers have been developed: N50 for 2 minutes followed by 30 seconds of IPA.

Substrate mounting
The 2" wafers are mounted with crystalbond in the center of 4" Si carriers that have an oxide layer facing the plasma.
Conditioning the process chamber


Recipe Sinano 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.7 3.31 3.31 3.32
Cl2 (sccm) 0 0 0 0 0 20 15 15 0 0 0 0 0
BCl3 (sccm) 5 3 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
HBr (sccm) 15 17 15 15 15 0 0 0 15 15 15 15 15
Coil power (W) 900 L 900 F 900 F 900 F 900 F 900 L 900 L 900 F 900 F 900 L 900 F 900 F 900 F
Platen power (W) 50 50 60 75 90 60 60 60 75 60 75 75 30
Pressure (mtorr) 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 10 2 10 2 2 2
Temperature (oC) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 50 50 50 50
Spacers (mm) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100
Process time (s) 150 180 120 180 120 90 120 180 300 180 180 180 180
Etch rates (nm/min)
Averages 311 104 92 105 116 169 108 79 101 66 91 98 59
Std. Dev 44 15 15 21 22 9 11 31 29 4 28 18 12
Zep etch rate (nm/min)
30 40 51 67 45 59 53 36 19
Sidewall angle (degrees)
Averages 82 82 82 82 82 84 81 83 83 85 80 83 79
Std. Dev 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 2
CD loss (nm pr edge)
Averages 65 -11 -15 -2 -11 67 63 -29 -5 -29 10 -14 -17
Std. Dev 30 5 2 4 3 29 27 6 5 8 7 8 10
Bowing (nm)
Averages 31 31 15 6 5 22 12 15 28 13 25 1 -2
Std. Dev 6 7 3 6 4 5 2 6 9 7 5 2 2
Bottom curvature
Averages -9 -6 -9 -11 -9 9 -4 -8 -24 -2 -9 -13 -10
Std. Dev 22 19 19 11 7 17 15 15 12 15 13 17 18