Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/CSAR: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The thickness is measured on VASE Ellipsometer using a simple Cauchy model for a transparent polymer on Si. The measurements are performed at one incidence angle (70 degrees) only. 9 points on each 4" wafer has been measured; the standard deviation thus representing the homogeinity of the film on the 4" wafers. | The thickness is measured on VASE Ellipsometer using a simple Cauchy model for a transparent polymer on Si. The measurements are performed at one incidence angle (70 degrees) only. 9 points on each 4" wafer has been measured; the standard deviation thus representing the homogeinity of the film on the 4" wafers. | ||
Around 2 ml of resist per wafer has been used when fabricating these curves. If you use less than 2 ml, the thickness of the final resist might be smaller than reported here. | |||
Revision as of 10:57, 12 July 2016
Simple e-beam pattern in this resist has been tested, the results showed on this page. If you have questions to the process or wish to use this e-beam resist, please contact lithography at DTU Danchip.
Spin Curves
The thickness is measured on VASE Ellipsometer using a simple Cauchy model for a transparent polymer on Si. The measurements are performed at one incidence angle (70 degrees) only. 9 points on each 4" wafer has been measured; the standard deviation thus representing the homogeinity of the film on the 4" wafers.
Around 2 ml of resist per wafer has been used when fabricating these curves. If you use less than 2 ml, the thickness of the final resist might be smaller than reported here.
AllResist AR-P 6200.09 (> 2ml per 4" wafer) spinning on Spin Coater: Manual LabSpin A-5, TIGRE, 09-04-2014. Softbake 5 min @ 150 degC. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spin Speed [rpm] | Acceleration [1/s2] | Thickness [nm] | ||||
2000 | 4000 | 226 | ||||
3000 | 4000 | 194 | ||||
4000 | 4000 | 170 | ||||
5000 | 4000 | 151 | ||||
6000 | 4000 | 142 | ||||
7000 | 4000 | 127 |
AllResist CSAR 6200.09 1:1 in anisole (< 2ml per 4" wafer), Spin Coater: Manual LabSpin A-5, TIGRE, 16-06-2014. Softbake 2 min @ 150 degC. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spin Speed [rpm] | Acceleration [1/s2] | Thickness [nm] | ||||
2000 | 4000 | 84 | ||||
3000 | 4000 | 67 | ||||
4000 | 4000 | 59 | ||||
5000 | 4000 | 53 | ||||
6000 | 4000 | 49 |
AllResist CSAR 6200.18 (< 2ml per 4" wafer), Spin Coater: Manual Standard Resists, E-5, TIGRE, 15-06-2016. Softbake 2 min @ 180 degC. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spin Speed [rpm] | Acceleration [1/s2] | Thickness [nm] | ||||
2000 | 2000 | 1003 | ||||
3000 | 2000 | 809 | ||||
4000 | 2000 | 721 | ||||
5000 | 2000 | 639 | ||||
6000 | 2000 | 586 | ||||
7000 | 2000 | 549 |
Contrast Curves
CSAR 6200.09
100 nm lines in both ~70 nm and ~188 nm thick CSAR has been developed with AR-600-546 (standard CSAR developer) at room temperature.
CSAR Contrast Curve, Processed by TIGRE, FEB-MARCH 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Resist | Spin Coat | E-beam exposure | Development | Characterisation |
CSAR AR-P6200.09 AllResist, CSAR AR-P6200.09 diluted 1:1 in Anisole | 08-02-2016, LabSpin E-5, 4000 rpm, 60s, softbaked 60s @ 205 degC | 09-02-2016, JBX9500 E-2, 2nA aperture 5, doses 40-600 µC/cm2, 100 nm lines and 300 nm spaces | 11-02-2016, Fumehood D-2, AR-600-546, rinsed in IPA 60s. | 02-03-2016 AFM Icon, F-2, ScanAsyst in Air |
CSAR 6200.18
100 nm lines in ~900 nm thick CSAR has been developed with AR-600-546 (standard CSAR developer) at room temperature.
CSAR Contrast Curve, Processed by TIGRE, JUNE 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Resist | Spin Coat | E-beam exposure | Development | Characterisation |
CSAR AR-P6200.18 AllResist | 15-06-2016, LabSpin E-5, 2000 rpm, 60s, softbaked 60s @ 205 degC | 15-06-2016, JBX9500 E-2, 2nA aperture 5, doses 40-600 µC/cm2, 100 nm lines and 300 nm spaces | 16-06-2016, Fumehood E-4, AR-600-546, 30s/60s/90s, rinsed in IPA 60s. | JUNE/JULY 2016 SEM Supra 2, 10 keV |
Dark Erosion
Dark erosion has been measured on a un-exposed 4" wafer spin coated with CSAR 6200.18 to a thickness of approximately 549 nm. The resist thickness has been measured by VASE Ellipsometer before development, and after 3 minutes, 13 minutes, and 30 minutes of development in AR 600 546.
The graphs shows the measured thicknesses; the errorbars represents the standard deviations from the ellipsometric measurements. The average etch rate of CSAR is ~0.1 nm/min.
Dosetests
So far (September 2014) three wafers with CSAR have been e-beam exposed with dosetests and inspected in SEM. Thickness of resist, e-beam dose and development time has been changed somewhat from wafer to wafer:
style = "border-radius: 6px; border: 3px solid #000000;
Process | Equipment | Parameters | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
6.13 | 4.09 | 3.05 | ||
Resist | Fumehood D-3 | Resist: AR-P 6200/2 diluted 1:1 in anisole (Bottled opened 16-06-2014 TIGRE) | Resist: AR-P 6200/2 diluted 1:1 in anisole (Bottled opened 16-06-2014 TIGRE) | Resist: AR-P 6200/2 |
Spin Coat | Spin Coater LabSpin A-5 | Spin: 1 min @ 6000 rpm, softbake: 1 min @ 150 degC, thickness: ~50nm (27-08-2014 TIGRE) |
Spin: 1 min @ 5000 rpm, softbake: 2 min @ 150 degC, thickness: ~53nm (16-06-2014 TIGRE) |
Spin: 1 min @ 6000 rpm, softbake: 5 min @ 150 degC, thickness: ~143nm (09-04-2014 TIGRE) |
E-beam exposure | JEOL 9500 E-2 | Condition file: 0.2nA_ap5, doses: 180-420 muC/cm2, Shot pitch: 7-27 nm, PEC: no (27-08-2014 TIGRE) |
Condition file: 0.2nA_ap5, doses: 207-242 muC/cm2, Shot pitch: 5 nm, PEC: no (02-07-2014 TIGRE) |
Condition file: 2nA_ap5, doses: 207-242 muC/cm2, Shot pitch: 5 nm, PEC: no (10-04-2014 TIGRE) |
Develop | Fumehood D-3 | Developer: SX-AR 600-54/6, time: 30 sec, Rinse: 30 sec in IPA (28-08-2014 TIGRE) |
Developer: SX-AR 600-54/6, time: 60 sec, Rinse: 30 sec in IPA (08-07-2014 TIGRE) |
Developer: SX-AR 600-54/6, time: 60 sec, Rinse: 60 sec in IPA (April/May-2014 TIGRE) |
Sputter Coat (please contact Ramona Valentina Mateiu for information ) | Cressington 208HR, DTU CEN | 3-5 nm Pt, sputtering, (29-08-2014 TIGRE) | 3-5 nm Pt, sputtering (09-07-2014 TIGRE) | 3-5 nm Pt, sputtering (22-05-2014 TIGRE) |
Characterization | Zeiss SEM Supra 60VP, D-3 | Acc voltage: 3 kV, WD: < 4mm, conducting tape close to pattern (29-08-2014 TIGRE) |
Acc voltage: 3 kV, WD: < 4mm, conducting tape close to pattern (09-07-2014 TIGRE) |
Acc voltage: 2 kV, WD: < 4mm, conducting tape close to pattern (06-06-2014 TIGRE) |
SEM inspection
SEM inspection of wafer 6.13, 100 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 7 nm | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 [muC/cm2] | ACHK NOT READY |
SEM inspection of wafer 6.13, 50 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 7 nm | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
270 [muC/cm2] | ACHK NOT READY | ||||||
300 [muC/cm2] | ACHK NOT READY |
SEM inspection of wafer 6.13, 30 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 7 nm | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
270 [muC/cm2] | ACHK NOT READY | ||||||
300 [muC/cm2] | ACHK NOT READY |
SEM inspection of wafer 6.13, 20 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 7 nm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
270 [muC/cm2] | ACHK NOT READY | |||
300 [muC/cm2] | ACHK NOT READY |
SEM inspection of wafer 4.09, 50 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 5 nm | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
230 [muC/cm2] |
SEM inspection of wafer 4.09, 30 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 5 nm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
219 [muC/cm2] | ||||
230 [muC/cm2] | ||||
242 [muC/cm2] |
SEM inspection of wafer 4.09, 20 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 5 nm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
242 [muC/cm2] | ||||
253 [muC/cm2] |
SEM inspection of wafer 3.05, 50 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 5 nm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
219 [muC/cm2] | ||||
230 [muC/cm2] | ||||
242 [muC/cm2] |
SEM inspection of wafer 3.05, 30 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 5 nm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
219 [muC/cm2] | ||||
230 [muC/cm2] | ||||
242 [muC/cm2] |
SEM inspection of wafer 3.05, 20 nm exposed pattern, shot pitch 5 nm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
230 [muC/cm2] | ||||
242 [muC/cm2] | ||||
253 [muC/cm2] |
Etch Tests
If you have wafers or chips with CSAR you would like to have tested, please send me an [email].
Chlorine versus flourine-based etches
We have experienced problems with removal of CSAR after chlorine-based dry etch, see the file File:DryEtchTestsCSAR.pdf. It seems the chlorine etch forms particles of chlorinated CSAR on the surface, and these particles remains on the surface after resist removal with AR-600-71. The C4F8/SF6 etch also forms particles on the surface, but much smaller than those formed in the chlorine etch. It seems these particles are removed after 3 minutes in AR-600-71.
How to mount chips in dry etch tools
All etch rates presented here are measured on chips (i.e. diced 4" wafers) crystal bonded to a carrier. The carrier is either a blank Si wafer, a Si wafer spin coated with resist or a Si wafer coated with ALD grown Al2O3.
Sample | CSAR Etch rate nm/min |
---|---|
Full 4" Si wafer with non-patterned ~180 nm CSAR | ~56.5 (based on 2 runs) |
Full 4" Si wafer with non-patterned ~240 nm CSAR, postbaked 60 sec @ 130 degC |
~56.5 (based on 2 runs) |
1/4 4" Si wafer with non-patterned ~125 nm CSAR, not crystal bonded to Si carrier |
~83.3 (based on 3 runs) |
1/4 4" Si wafer with non-patterned ~125 CSAR, crystal bonded to 4" Si carrier |
~54 (based on 1 run) |
Etch rates and profile inspection
Continous Etches