Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure Dose: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Taran (talk | contribs)
Jehem (talk | contribs)
Tag: New redirect
 
(92 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=This page is under construction [[Image:section under construction.jpg|70px]]=
#REDIRECT [[Specific Process Knowledge/Lithography/Resist#Exposure_dose]]
 
 
<!--
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure_Dose click here]'''


=Exposure dose=
=Exposure dose=
[[Image:AZ spectral sensitivity.gif|300x300px|thumb|Spectral sensitivity of AZ resists represented as optical absorption. From http://www.microchemicals.com/]]
[[Image:AZ photoresists spectral sensitivity - remake v1.png|400x400px|thumb|Spectral sensitivity of AZ resists represented as optical absorption.]]


During exposure of the resist, the photoinitiator, or photo-active component, reacts with the exposure light, and starts the reaction that makes the resist develop in the developer. In a positive resist, it makes the resist become soluble in the developer. In a negative resist, usually assisted by thermal energy in the post-exposure bake, it makes the resist insoluble in the developer. The amount of light required to fully develop the resist in the development process, is the exposure dose.
During exposure of the resist, the photoinitiator, or photo-active component, reacts with the exposure light, and starts the reaction that makes the resist develop in the developer. In a positive resist, it makes the resist become soluble in the developer. In a negative resist, usually assisted by thermal energy in the post-exposure bake, it makes the resist insoluble in the developer. The amount of light required to fully develop the resist in the development process, is the exposure dose.
The optimal exposure dose is a function of many parameters, including the type of resist, the resist thickness, and the sensitivity of the resist.
The optimal exposure dose is a function of many parameters, including the type of resist, the resist thickness, and the sensitivity of the resist.


The resist sensitivity is a measure of how efficiently it reacts to the exposure light. Spectral sensitivity is the sensitivity of the resist as a function of wavelength. It is usually given simply as the range from the wavelength below which absorption in the resist material makes lithography impractical to the wavelength at which the photoinitiator is no longer efficiently activated. The spectral sensitivity is listed in the [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVLithography#Resist_Overview|Resist Overview]]. Within this range, the optical absorption is commonly used as a measure of sensitivity. A high absorption coefficient signifies a high sensitivity, as the light is absorbed by the photoinitiator. Because of spectral sensitivity, the optimal dose of a given resist type and thickness is also a function of the spectral distribution of the exposure light, i.e. the equipment used for the exposure, see table below. Made using a combination of experience, calculation, and assumption, the values given in the [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure_Dose#Comparison:_Relative_exposure_dose|Relative exposure dose]] table may be used to estimate the dose for one equipment from the known dose on another equipment.
The resist sensitivity is a measure of how efficiently it reacts to the exposure light. Spectral sensitivity is the sensitivity of the resist as a function of wavelength. It is usually given simply as the range from the wavelength below which absorption in the resist material makes lithography impractical to the wavelength at which the photoinitiator is no longer efficiently activated. The spectral sensitivity is listed in the [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVLithography#Resist_Overview|Resist Overview]]. Within this range, the optical absorption is commonly used as a measure of sensitivity. A high absorption coefficient signifies a high sensitivity, as the light is absorbed by the photoinitiator. Because of spectral sensitivity, the optimal dose of a given resist type and thickness is also a function of the spectral distribution of the exposure light, i.e. the equipment used for the exposure, see tables below. Using a combination of experience, calculation, and assumption, one may be able to estimate the dose for one equipment from the known dose on another equipment.


Due to reflection and refraction at the interface between the resist and the substrate, the optimal dose may also be a function of the type of substrate used. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.
Due to reflection and refraction at the interface between the resist and the substrate, the optimal dose may also be a function of the type of substrate used. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.


Apart from the already mentioned factors, the optimal dose also depends on the developer chemistry and the parameters used in the development process. Finally, the requirements to the lithographic process in terms of resolution, bias (line broadening), etch selectivity, side wall angle, etc. may narrow down, or widen, the process window. The exposure doses given in the sections below should be used as a starting point for individual fabrication process development.  
Apart from the already mentioned factors, the optimal dose also depends on the developer chemistry and the parameters used in the development process. Finally, the requirements to the lithographic process in terms of resolution, bias (line broadening), etch selectivity, side wall angle, etc. may narrow down, or widen, the process window. The exposure doses given in the sections below should be used as a starting point for individual fabrication process development.  
Due to the process of bleaching, where the absorption of the resist changes during exposure, the exposure dose is unfortunately not always constant at different intensities of the exposure light. The exposure time is thus not always a linear function of the exposure intensity.




'''Mask aligners:'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="7" style="text-align:center;"  
{|border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="7" style="text-align:center;"  
|-
|-
Line 32: Line 39:
|i-line notch filter
|i-line notch filter


365nm (FWHM = 7 nm)
365 nm (FWHM = 7 nm)
|7 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> @ 365 nm (Constant Intensity)
|8 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> @ 365 nm (Constant Intensity)
|
|
*no filter (broadband)
*no filter (broadband)
Line 46: Line 53:
|i-line notch filter
|i-line notch filter


365nm (FWHM = ? nm)
365 nm (FWHM = ? nm)
|? mW/cm<sup>2</sup> @ 365 nm (Constant Intensity)
|The intensity is set by the user
 
11 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> @ 365 nm
|
|
*no filter (broadband)
*no filter (broadband)
Line 53: Line 62:
*UV350 (280 - 350 nm)
*UV350 (280 - 350 nm)
*UV250 (240 - 260 nm)
*UV250 (240 - 260 nm)
|-
|}
The most powerful UV lines in the Hg spectrum are the i-, h-, and g-lines at 356 nm, 405 nm, and 435 nm wavelength, respectively. While the Hg lamp produces little or no intensity in the deep-UV (UV-C) range, the Hg-Xe lamp has increased output below 300 nm.
'''Maskless aligners:'''
{|border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="7" style="text-align:center;"
|-
|-
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|
!Source
!Wavelength
|-
|-


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#Aligner-6inch|Aligner-6inch]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#Aligner:_Maskless_01|Aligner: Maskless 01]]
|350 W Hg
|LED
|SU-8 long-pass filter (50% i-line)
|365 nm
|-
 
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#Aligner:_Maskless_02|Aligner: Maskless 02]]
|Laser diode array
|375 nm
 
or


Broadband i-, h-, and g-line
405 nm
|7 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> @ 365 nm (Constant Power)
|
*no filter (broadband)
*i-line (notch)
|-
|-
|}


|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#Aligner:_Maskless_03|Aligner: Maskless 03]]
|Laser diode array
|405 nm
|-


The most powerful UV lines in the Hg spectrum are the i-, h-, and g-lines at 356 nm, 405 nm, and 435 nm wavelength, respectively. While the Hg lamp produces little or no intensity in the deep-UV (UV-C) range, the Hg-Xe lamp has increased output below 300 nm.
|}
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


==Calculating exposure time==
==Calculating exposure time==
In the maskless aligners, the dose is set directly as a process parameter in the job. In mask aligners, on the other hand, the parameter that is set is the exposure time, i.e. how long the shutter is open during the exposure.
The exposure dose, ''D'' [J/m<sup>2</sup>], is given by:
The exposure dose, ''D'' [J/m<sup>2</sup>], is given by:


Line 80: Line 117:
where ''I'' [W/m<sup>2</sup>] is the intensity of the exposure light, and ''t'' [s] is the exposure time. As the intensity is specific to the spectral sensitivity of the sensor used to measure the exposure light, and the exposure time is specific to the spectral distribution of the exposure light (cf. spectral sensitivity), this dose is specific to the combination of exposure source and optical sensor.
where ''I'' [W/m<sup>2</sup>] is the intensity of the exposure light, and ''t'' [s] is the exposure time. As the intensity is specific to the spectral sensitivity of the sensor used to measure the exposure light, and the exposure time is specific to the spectral distribution of the exposure light (cf. spectral sensitivity), this dose is specific to the combination of exposure source and optical sensor.


Given the optimum exposure dose, the exposure time is calculated as:
Given an exposure dose, the exposure time is calculated as:


''' ''t'' = ''D'' / ''I'' '''.
''' ''t'' = ''D'' / ''I'' '''.


It is important to keep in mind that this exposure time is valid only for a specific combination of exposure source and optical sensor, as well as for a specific development process.
It is important to keep in mind that this exposure time is valid only for a specific combination of exposure source and optical sensor, as well as for a specific development process.
SECTION HIDDEN BY TARAN 20-03-2020


==Comparison: Relative exposure dose==
==Comparison: Relative exposure dose==
Line 96: Line 135:
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#KS_Aligner|KS Aligner]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#KS_Aligner|KS Aligner]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#Aligner:_MA6_-_2|Aligner: MA6 - 2]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#Aligner:_MA6_-_2|Aligner: MA6 - 2]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure#Aligner-6inch|Aligner-6inch]]
|-
|-


Line 103: Line 141:
!AZ 5214E
!AZ 5214E
|1
|1
|1
|1.15 <sup>1)</sup>
|0.5
|-
|-


Line 111: Line 148:
!AZ 4562
!AZ 4562
|1
|1
|1
|1.15 <sup>1)</sup>
|0.5
|-
|-


Line 119: Line 155:
!AZ MiR 701
!AZ MiR 701
|1
|1
|1
|1.15 <sup>1)</sup>
|0.2
|-
|-


Line 127: Line 162:
!AZ nLOF 2020
!AZ nLOF 2020
|1
|1
|1
|1.15 <sup>1)</sup>
|1
|-
|-


Line 135: Line 169:
!SU-8
!SU-8
|1
|1
|1  
|1.15 <sup>1)</sup>
|0.6 - 1
|-
|-
|}
|}
<sup>1)</sup> Due to a difference in the sensitivity of the power meter used in calibration.


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


=Exposure dose when using AZ 351B developer=
=Exposure dose when using AZ 726 MIF developer (TMAH)=
 
==KS Aligner==
==KS Aligner (351B)==
The KS Aligner has an i-line notch filter installed. This results in an exposure light peak around 365 nm with a FWHM of 7 nm. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.
The KS Aligner has an i-line notch filter installed. This results in an exposure light peak around 365 nm with a FWHM of 7 nm. Dependent on the spectral sensitivity of the resist, the optimal dose may be increased compared to broadband exposure on the Aligner-6inch. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />
Line 156: Line 190:
!Thickness
!Thickness
!Dose
!Dose
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Development#Developer-6inch|Development]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Development#Developer_TMAH_UV-lithography|Development]]
!Comments
!Comments
|-
|-
Line 164: Line 198:
!rowspan="3"|AZ 5214E
!rowspan="3"|AZ 5214E
|1.5 µm
|1.5 µm
|35-49 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|72 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|60 s
|rowspan="3"|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="3"|Positive process
|rowspan="3"|Positive process
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|2.2 µm
|2.2 µm
|56-70 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|80 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|70 s
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-
|4.2 µm
|4.2 µm
|~140 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|160 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|3 minutes
|-
|-


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!rowspan="2"|AZ 5214E
!AZ 4562
|1.5 µm
|10 µm
|21 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|480-540 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|60 s
|Multiple puddle, 4 x 60 s
|rowspan="2"|Image reversal process. Flood exposure after reversal bake: 210 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Multiple exposure with 10-15 s pauses is recommended.
|-
|-
|2.2 µm
 
|24 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|70 s
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!rowspan="3"|AZ MiR 701
|1 µm
|~180 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="2"|PEB: 60 s at 110°C
Preliminary results
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|2 µm
|~200 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|4 µm
|~400 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="1"|PEB: 90 s at 110°C


Preliminary results
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
 
!AZ 4562
|10 µm
|~280 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|5 minutes
|Multiple exposure with 10 s pauses is recommended.
|-
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ nLOF 2020
|2 µm
|100-120 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|PEB: 60 s at 110°C
Side wall angle ~15°. For lover angle, develop 30 s (~5°)
|}
|}
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


'''Additional information:'''
==Aligner: MA6 - 2==
 
The Aligner: MA6-2 has an i-line notch filter installed. This results in an exposure light peak around 365 nm with a FWHM of 7 nm. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.
'''AZ 5214E image reversal'''
*1.5 µm resist on boron glass: around 49 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> (supplied March 2013 by Morten Bo Lindholm Mikkelsen, DTU Nanotech).
 
==Aligner-6inch (351B)==
 
The Aligner-6inch has a long pass filter designed for SU-8 exposure installed. The SU-8 filter has no transmission in the 250-330 nm range, and close to full transmission in the 400-500 nm range. In the 350-370 nm range, the transmission is approximately 0.5. This results in a broadband exposure light consisting of the i-line (365 nm), the h-line (405 nm), and the g-line (435 nm) from the Hg spectrum. Dependent on the spectral sensitivity of the resist, the optimal dose may be decreased compared to i-line exposure on the KS-Aligner. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.


<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />
Line 217: Line 261:
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|-style="background:silver; color:black"
|
|
!Date
!Thickness
!Thickness
!Dose
!Dose
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Development#Developer-6inch|Development]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Development#Developer_TMAH_UV-lithography|Development]]
!Comments
!Comments
|-
|-
Line 225: Line 270:
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!rowspan="1"|AZ 5214E
!rowspan="2"|AZ 5214E<br><span style="color:red">Old German version</span>
|Long ago
|1.5 µm
|72 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="2"|Positive process
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Long ago
|2.2 µm
|90 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|-
 
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!rowspan="2"|AZ 5214E Image Reversal<br><span style="color:red">Old German version</span>
|Long ago
|1.5 µm
|22 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="2"|Image reversal process.<br>Reversal bake: 120s at 110°C.<br>Flood exposure: 200 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
|Long ago
|2.2 µm
|25 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|-
 
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!rowspan="3"|AZ MiR 701<br><span style="color:red">Old PFOA containing version</span>
|Long ago
|1.5 µm
|1.5 µm
|35-49 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|169 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|60 s
|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="1"|Positive process
|rowspan="2"|PEB: 60 s at 110°C
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Long ago
|2 µm
|~200 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|Long ago
|4 µm
|~280 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="1"|PEB: 60 s at 110°C<br>Process adopted from process logs
|-
 
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ nLOF 2020
|Long ago
|1.5 µm
|104 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 30 s
|PEB: 60 s at 110°C<br>Use 60 s development for lift-off
|-


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!rowspan="2"|AZ 5214E
!AZ 5214E<br><span style="color:green">New Japanese version</span>
|2023-01-11<br>jehem
|1.5 µm
|1.5 µm
|10.5 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|70 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|60 s
|Single puddle, 60 s
|rowspan="2"|Image reversal process. Flood exposure after reversal bake: 105 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|
|-
 
|-
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ 5214E Image Reversal<br><span style="color:green">New Japanese version</span>
|2023-01-11<br>jehem
|2.2 µm
|2.2 µm
|12 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|22 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|70 s
|Single puddle, 60 s
|Image reversal process.<br>Reversal bake: 60s at 110°C.<br>Flood exposure: 500 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|-
|-


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!AZ 4562
!AZ 4562<br><span style="color:green">New Japanese version</span>
|2021-12-08<br>jehem
|10 µm
|10 µm
|~140 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|550 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|5 minutes
|Multiple puddles, 5 x 60 s
|Multiple exposure with 10s pauses is recommended.
|Priming: HMDS<BR>Rehydration after SB: 1 hour (may not be necessary)<br>Exposure: Multiple exposures with pauses, 5 x (10 s exposure + 10 s pause)<br>Degassing after exposure: 1 hour (may not be necessary)
|-
 
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ MiR 701<br><span style="color:green">New PFOA free version</span>
|2021-06-23<br>elkh
|1.5 µm
|~150 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|PEB: 60 s at 110°C
|-
|-
|}
|}
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


=Exposure dose when using AZ 726 MIF developer=
==Maskless aligners==
 
'''THIS SECTION IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION''' [[Image:section under construction.jpg|70px]]
 
===Aligner: Maskless 01===
 
Aligner: Maskless 01 uses a 365nm LED source. The exposure dose needed seems to follow the dose needed to process the same substrate in [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure_Dose#Aligner:_MA6_-_2|Aligner: MA6-2]]. As doses get higher, there is a tendency for the dose needed in the Aligner: Maskless 01 to exceed the dose needed in Aligner: MA6-2.
 
More information about the process parameters for exposure using Aligner: Maskless 01 can be found [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_01_processing#Process_Parameters|'''here''']]. The [http://labmanager.dtu.dk/function.php?module=Processlog&view=editlog&machid=422 process log] is also a good source of information.
 
===Aligner: Maskless 02===
 
Aligner: Maskless 02 uses a 375nm or 405nm laser diode array source. Information about the process parameters for exposure using Aligner: Maskless 02 can be found [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_02_processing#Process_Parameters|'''here''']]. The [http://labmanager.dtu.dk/function.php?module=Processlog&view=editlog&machid=440 process log] is also a good source of information.


==KS Aligner (726)==
===Aligner: Maskless 03===
 
Aligner: Maskless 03 uses a 405nm laser diode array source. Information about the process parameters for exposure using Aligner: Maskless 03 can be found [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Aligners/Aligner:_Maskless_03_processing#Process_Parameters|'''here''']]. The [http://labmanager.dtu.dk/function.php?module=Processlog&view=editlog&machid=464 process log] is also a good source of information.
 
=Exposure dose when using AZ 351B developer (NaOH)=
 
==KS Aligner (351B)==
The KS Aligner has an i-line notch filter installed. This results in an exposure light peak around 365 nm with a FWHM of 7 nm. Dependent on the spectral sensitivity of the resist, the optimal dose may be increased compared to broadband exposure on the Aligner-6inch. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.
The KS Aligner has an i-line notch filter installed. This results in an exposure light peak around 365 nm with a FWHM of 7 nm. Dependent on the spectral sensitivity of the resist, the optimal dose may be increased compared to broadband exposure on the Aligner-6inch. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.


Line 269: Line 405:
!Thickness
!Thickness
!Dose
!Dose
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Development#Developer_TMAH_UV-lithography|Development]]
![[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/Development#Developer-6inch|Development]]
!Comments
!Comments
|-
|-
Line 275: Line 411:
|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!AZ 5214E
!rowspan="3"|AZ 5214E
|1.5 µm
|1.5 µm
|60 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|65-75mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|60 s
|Positive process
|rowspan="3"|Positive process
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|2.2 µm
|64-80 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|70 s
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|4.2 µm
|~160 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|3 minutes
|-
|-


|-
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ 4562
!rowspan="2"|AZ 5214E
|10 µm
|1.5 µm
|300-350 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|30 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Multiple puddle, 4 x 60 s
|60 s
|Multiple exposure with 10 s pauses is recommended.
|rowspan="2"|Image reversal process.  


Process not yet established.
Reversal bake: 100s at 110°C.<br>Flood exposure after reversal bake: 210 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
|2.2 µm
|35 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|70 s
|-
|-


|-
|-
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
|-style="background:WhiteSmoke; color:black"
!AZ MiR 701
!AZ 4562
|1 µm
|10 µm
|? mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|~320 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|5 minutes
|PEB: 60 s at 110°C
|Multiple exposure with 10 s pauses is recommended.
|-
 
|-
|-
|-style="background:LightGrey; color:black"
!AZ nLOF 2020
|2 µm
|84-112 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>
|Single puddle, 60 s
|Side wall angle ~15°. For lover angle, develop 30 s (~5°)
|}
|}
<br clear="all" />
<br clear="all" />


==Aligner: MA6 - 2 (726)==
'''Additional information:'''
Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.


''No process results yet. Use [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure_Dose#Comparison:_Relative_exposure_dose|Relative exposure dose]] table to estimate dose.''
'''AZ 5214E image reversal'''
 
*1.5 µm resist on boron glass: around 49 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> (supplied March 2013 by Morten Bo Lindholm Mikkelsen, DTU Nanotech).
==Aligner-6inch (726)==
 
The Aligner-6inch has a long pass filter designed for SU-8 exposure installed. The SU-8 filter has no transmission in the 250-330 nm range, and close to full transmission in the 400-500 nm range. In the 350-370 nm range, the transmission is approximately 0.5. This results in a broadband exposure light consisting of the i-line (365 nm), the h-line (405 nm), and the g-line (435 nm) from the Hg spectrum. Dependent on the spectral sensitivity of the resist, the optimal dose may be decreased compared to i-line exposure on the KS-Aligner. Unless otherwise stated, the exposure doses given here are for standard silicon wafers.


''No process results. Use [[Specific_Process_Knowledge/Lithography/UVExposure/UVExposure_dose#Comparison:_Relative_exposure_dose|Relative exposure dose]] table to estimate dose.''
-->

Latest revision as of 10:47, 23 October 2023