Specific Process Knowledge/Characterization/Profiler/Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test: Difference between revisions
(136 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Feedback to this page''': '''[mailto:labadviser@nanolab.dtu.dk?Subject=Feed%20back%20from%20page%20http://labadviser.nanolab.dtu.dk/index.php/Specific_Process_Knowledge/Characterization/Profiler/Optical_Profiler_(Sensofar)_acceptance_test click here]''' | |||
=<span style="color:#FF0000"> This optical profiler has been decommissioned and replaced by the S Neox system </span> = | |||
=Results from the Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test= | =Results from the Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test= | ||
The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by | The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by ST Instruments and Sensofar together with | ||
Pernille V. Larsen @ | Pernille V. Larsen@ DTU nanolab and Berit G. Herstrøm @ DTU nanolab. | ||
==This Table shows the | ==This Table shows an overview of the acceptance tests== | ||
{| {{table} border="1" | {| {{table} border="1" | ||
Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Acceptance criteria''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Acceptance criteria''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1||Patterned flat sample of silicon||Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate | | [[#Results_of_acceptance_test_no._1,_2_and_3|1]]||Patterned flat sample of silicon||Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate <br/> Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:10 on a 10 µm wide trench||Depth 100±2 µm | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2||Patterned flat sample of silicon.||Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate | | [[#Results_of_acceptance_test_no._1,_2_and_3|2]]||Patterned flat sample of silicon.||Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate <br/> Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:11 on a 8 µm wide trench||Depth 91±2 µm | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 3||Patterned flat sample of silicon||Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate||Depth 85±2 µm | | [[#Results_of_acceptance_test_no._1,_2_and_3|3]]||Patterned flat sample of silicon||Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate <br/> Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:13 on a 6.4 µm wide trench||Depth 85±2 µm | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 4||Patterned flat sample of glass||3D profile of pattern etched down in a quartz sample.||Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1% | | [[#Results_of_acceptance_test_no._4|4]]||Patterned flat sample of glass||3D profile of pattern etched down in a quartz sample. <br/> Pattern size 20 µm x 20 µm, depth 500 nm||Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 5||Flat sample of silicon with thick patterned oxide||Step height of patterned thick (10 µm) oxide on top of a silicon wafer.||Step height must be within ±3% of a SEM profile measurement. | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 5|5]]||Flat sample of silicon with thick patterned oxide||Step height of patterned thick (10 µm) oxide on top of a silicon wafer. <br/> 7 µm deep pattern, trench width 6 µm||Step height must be within ±3% of a SEM profile measurement. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 6||Flat sample of silicon with thick layer of patterned polymer||Sample material: SU8 on silicon. ||Height 69±2 µm | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 6|6]]||Flat sample of silicon with thick layer of patterned polymer||Sample material: SU8 on silicon. <br/> Pillar heights of 69 µm with 25 µm between pillar edges ||Height 69±2 µm | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 7||Free standing structure||Measure bow due to stress of a membrane.||Membrane bow repeatability of 5 successive measurement within 2% | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 7|7]]||Free standing structure||Measure bow due to stress of a membrane. <br/> Membrane material: Si(2 µm)/SiO2(~1 µm)/Au(50 nm) <br/> Membrane size: honey comb structure approximately 150 µm in diameter <br/> Bow < 500 nm ||Membrane bow repeatability of 5 successive measurement within 2% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 8|8]]||Stitching of large area||Stitching 4 mm x 4 mm on same sample as in 7. The area consists of many closed packed honey comb formed membranes.||Membrane bow must the same as on 7 within 2% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 9|9]]||Narrow trenches and holes ||Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate <br/> 2.5 µm wide trench in silicon with a depth of 20 µm||Depth 20±2 µm | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |||| | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 10|10]]||Film thickness measurement of transparent thin film||Transparent thin film thickness of 28 nm SiO2 on Si||SiO2 thickness 28±1 nm | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 11||Measurements of multiple stacks||120 nm nitride on 110 nm oxide on a silicon substrate||Within ±2% on each layer from an ellipsometer measurement. | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 11|11]]||Measurements of multiple stacks||120 nm nitride on 110 nm oxide on a silicon substrate||Within ±2% on each layer from an ellipsometer measurement. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ||||Measure thickness of AZ-resist on pillars of 50 µm in diameter|| | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 12|12]]||Film thickness measurements of transparent films on small structure||Sample material: Si with 1.5 µm patterned AZ-resist <br/> Measure thickness of AZ-resist on pillars of 50 µm in diameter||Within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ||||3 successive measurements of the roughness || | | [[#Results of acceptance test no. 13|13]]||Roughness repeatability||Sample material: Si wafer with poly-silicon layer <br/> 3 successive measurements of the roughness ||Repeatability within 0.2% | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Results of acceptance test no. 1, 2 and 3== | |||
Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate | ||
Measurement: Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:10, 1:11 and 1:13 on a 10µm, 8mm and 6.4µm wide trenches respectively | |||
Acceptance criteria: Depth 100±2 µm, 91±2µm and 85±2µm. The SEM profile images of the three trenches are shown here: | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[image:Sensofar_A1_SEM.jpg|200x200px|thumb|center|A1]] | |||
! | |||
[[image:Sensofar_A2_SEM.jpg|200x200px|thumb|center|A2]] | |||
! | |||
[[image:Sensofar_A3_SEM.jpg|200x200px|thumb|center|A3]] | |||
|} | |||
'''Results''' | |||
Test no. 1 was done in two ways: | |||
#With confocal objective EPI 100x-N: [[Media:Sensofar_A1_100XEPI_with_fine_shift_dual_light_900_60.pdf|See the results here]] | #With confocal objective EPI 100x-N: [[Media:Sensofar_A1_100XEPI_with_fine_shift_dual_light_900_60.pdf|See the results here]] | ||
#With Interferometric objective 50X DI: [[Media: Sensofar_A1_vsi_50xDI_SNR_with_increased_gain_and_contrast.pdf|See the results here | #With Interferometric objective 50X DI: [[Media: Sensofar_A1_vsi_50xDI_SNR_with_increased_gain_and_contrast.pdf|See the results here | ||
]] | ]] | ||
==== | Test no. 2 was done using: confocal objective EPI 100x-N: [[Media:Sensofar_A2_100xEPI.pdf|See the results here]] | ||
Test no. 3 was done using: confocal objective EPI 100x-N: [[Media:Sensofar_A3_100xEPI.pdf|See the results here]] | |||
====Settings for methode no. 1 for test no. 1, 2 and 3: confocal==== | |||
Recipe: Trench | Recipe: Trench | ||
*Operation mode: trench | *Operation mode: trench | ||
Line 84: | Line 107: | ||
**Dual - bottom up | **Dual - bottom up | ||
***top: 8µm | ***top: 8µm | ||
***Gap: 91µm | ***Gap: 91µm (<- choose the trench depth) | ||
***Bottom: 8µm | ***Bottom: 8µm | ||
**Speed factor: 1x | **Speed factor: 1x | ||
Line 91: | Line 114: | ||
*Light source | *Light source | ||
**Levels: 2 | **Levels: 2 | ||
***900 -> 60 | ***900 -> 60 (might need to be set a little different) | ||
***Gain: default | ***Gain: default | ||
====Setting for no. 2==== | ====Setting for methode no. 2 for test no. 1: interferometric==== | ||
We do not have a recipe for that but we | We do not have a recipe for that but we used: | ||
*Objective: Interferometric 50x DI | *Objective: Interferometric 50x DI | ||
*Z scan: VSI | *Z scan: VSI | ||
*Light | *Light source: increased gain and contrast | ||
==Results of acceptance test no. 4== | |||
Sample material: Patterned flat sample of glass | |||
Measurement: Depth of pattern | |||
Standard profiler measurement:335 nm | |||
Acceptance criteria:Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement (331.65nm-338.35nm) and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1% | |||
'''System settings:''' | |||
Objective: DI 50x-N | |||
VSI z scan: 10µm | |||
Treshold: 1% | |||
Average 4 images (to reduce noise) | |||
'''Results''' | |||
It was repeated 10 Time. | |||
The first measurement is shown [[Media:A4_vsi_50xDI_rep_R001.pdf|here]] | |||
'''This table show the depth value for the 10 measurements''' | |||
{| {{table} border="1" | |||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''''' | |||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Measured depth [nm]''' | |||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Repeated 20170925 with cover off''' | |||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Repeated 20180816 after repair''' | |||
|- | |||
| 1||337.5||347.9||341.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 2||336.5||333.9||340.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 3||334.7||341.5||337.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 4||335.5||343.2||330.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 5||339.2||347.7||339.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 6||337.2||345.4||340.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 7||334.2||341.8||338.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 8||335.5||337.9||339.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 9||341.1||342.1||334.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 10||344.4||335.9||336.4 | |||
|- | |||
|Average depth||337.58||341.73||337.82 | |||
|- | |||
|Repeatability||3.0% (the bad repeatability was accepted due to the high noise level in the room)||4.1%||3.0% | |||
|} | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 5== | |||
Sample: Flat sample of silicon with thick patterned oxide (APOX). | |||
Measurement: Step height of patterned thick (10 µm) oxide on top of a silicon wafer. The pattern is aprox. 7µm thick. | |||
Acceptance criteria: Step height must be within ±3% of a SEM profile measurement. See the SEM profile here: | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[Image:Sensofar_A5_SEM.jpg|200x200px|thumb|center|A5]] | |||
|} | |||
'''Settings:''' | |||
*Recipe: Acceptance nr. 5 SMR | |||
*Mode: default | |||
*Objective: 50x-DI | |||
*VSI Z scan 18.0µm | |||
*Threshold 2% | |||
*Note: Scan only in the APOX (not in the Si) or else the system will get confused. | |||
'''See the result here:''' | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[Media:Sensofar_A5_50xDI.pdf|Sensofar A5 result ]] | |||
|} | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 6== | |||
Sample: Flat sample of silicon with thick layer of patterned SU8. | |||
Measure: step height. | |||
Acceptance criteria: Height 69±2 µm | |||
'''Settings:''' | |||
*Recipe: Acceptance nr. 6 SMR | |||
*Mode: application Acceptance 6 | |||
**Raw smoothing confocal | |||
**Coarse shift single samle | |||
**Reject multiple reflections | |||
*Objective: Confocal EPI 20x-N | |||
*Z scan range: 104µm | |||
*Threshold: 2.0% | |||
'''See the result here:''' | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[Media:Sensofar_A6_20x.pdf|Sensofar A6 result no. 1 ]] | |||
! | |||
[[Media:Sensor_A6_20x_no2.pdf|Sensofar A6 result no. 2 ]] | |||
|} | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 7== | |||
Sample: Free standing structure. Membrane material: Si(2 µm)/SiO2(~1 µm)/Au(50 nm). Membrane size: honey comb structure approximately 150 µm in diameter | |||
Measure: Measure bow due to stress of a membrane. | |||
Acceptance criteria: Membrane bow repeatability of 5 successive measurement within 2% | |||
The sample was not as we suspected. There was almost no bow. The membrane looked broken and it did not really make any sense to measure the bow. | |||
'''Settings:''' | |||
Two different setting were tried out, the second was the most successful: | |||
Setting no. 1: | |||
*Objective: DI 50x-N | |||
*PSI | |||
*Threshold 2% | |||
Setting no. 2: | |||
*Objective: DI 50x-N | |||
*Z scan: VSI 10µm | |||
*Threshold: 1.0% | |||
'''Result''' | |||
The measurement we did are shown here: | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[Media:Sensofar_A7_overview of the measurements.pdf|Sensofar A7 result ]] | |||
|} | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 8== | |||
Measurement: Stitching 4 mm x 4 mm on same sample as in 7. | |||
Sample: The area consists of many closed packed honey comb formed membranes | |||
Acceptance criteria: Membrane bow must the same as on 7 within 2% | |||
'''Settings:''' | |||
*Extended topography | |||
*Objective: DI 20x-N | |||
*Z scan: VSI: 40µm | |||
*Threshold: 1.0% | |||
'''Result:''' | |||
We made a stitched image of the hole membrane and repeated it two times. It looked much the same but as for test 7 it was hard to do any measurements on it. See the images and profiles in the result file: | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[Media:Sensofar_A8_stitching_analysis_1_2.pdf|Sensofar A8 result ]] | |||
|} | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 9== | |||
Sample: Patterned silicon substrate. | |||
Measurement: Narrow trench depth | |||
Acceptance criteria: 20±2µm, see the SEM images here: | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[image:Sensofar_A9_SEM.jpg|200x200px|thumb|center|SEM profile image of structure]] | |||
|} | |||
'''Setting''' | |||
Recipe: Narrow trench | |||
*Operation mode: narrow trench | |||
**Coarse shift single sampling | |||
*Objective: EPI 100X-N | |||
*Z scan: | |||
**Dual - bottom up | |||
***top: 4µm | |||
***Gap: 20µm (the trench depth) | |||
***Bottom: 4µm | |||
*Speed factor: 1x | |||
*Threshold: 0.0% | |||
*Light source: | |||
**Levels: 2 | |||
**176 -> 30 (might need to be set a little different) | |||
*Gain: default | |||
'''Result''' | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[Media:Sensofar_A9_narrow_trench.pdf|Sensofar A9 result ]] | |||
|} | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 10== | |||
Sample: Transparent thin film thickness of 28 nm SiO2 on Si | |||
Measurement:Film thickness measurement of transparent thin film | |||
Acceptance criteria: SiO2 thickness 28±1 nm | |||
'''Settings''' | |||
*Objective: EPI 20x-N | |||
*Model: SiO2 thermal | |||
'''Result''' | |||
The result was 28.7nm | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 11== | |||
Sample: 120 nm nitride on 110 nm oxide on a silicon substrate | |||
Measurement: Measurements of multiple stacks | |||
Acceptance criteria: Within ±2% on each layer from an ellipsometer measurement (SiO2: 112nm, Si3N4: 139nm) | |||
'''Settings''' | |||
Model layers use: | |||
*SiO2_(therm) | |||
*Si3N4 | |||
'''Result''' | |||
*SiO2: 113.1nm | |||
*Si3N4: 136.9nm | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 12== | |||
Sample: Si with 1.4 µm patterned AZ-resist on 50µm pillars | |||
Measurement: Film thickness measurements of transparent films on small structure | |||
Acceptance criteria: Within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement. | |||
'''Settings''' | |||
Used Models -> Others -> Cauchy | |||
Options -> Roughness -> change amplitude fitting | |||
'''Result''' | |||
Within limits | |||
==Results of acceptance test no. 13== | |||
Sample: Si wafer with poly-silicon layer | |||
Measurement: Roughness repeatability, 3 successive measurements of the roughness | |||
Acceptance criteria: Repeatability within 0.2% | |||
Note: Because the surface roughness of the sample was very low and the noise/vibration level too high we could not obtain the specified repeatability. | |||
'''Result''' | |||
*The surface roughness (Ra) was 0.5nm | |||
*The repeatability over 10 measurements was 34% | |||
*The maximum deviation in roughness was 0.2nm | |||
Se the number in the file below: | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" | |||
! | |||
[[Media:Sensofar_13_psi_1_average.pdf|Sensofar A13 result ]] | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 10:35, 3 February 2023
Feedback to this page: click here
This optical profiler has been decommissioned and replaced by the S Neox system
Results from the Optical Profiler (Sensofar) acceptance test
The acceptance test was performed in January 2012 by ST Instruments and Sensofar together with Pernille V. Larsen@ DTU nanolab and Berit G. Herstrøm @ DTU nanolab.
This Table shows an overview of the acceptance tests
' | Title | Sample description / measurement | Acceptance criteria |
1 | Patterned flat sample of silicon | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:10 on a 10 µm wide trench |
Depth 100±2 µm |
2 | Patterned flat sample of silicon. | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:11 on a 8 µm wide trench |
Depth 91±2 µm |
3 | Patterned flat sample of silicon | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:13 on a 6.4 µm wide trench |
Depth 85±2 µm |
4 | Patterned flat sample of glass | 3D profile of pattern etched down in a quartz sample. Pattern size 20 µm x 20 µm, depth 500 nm |
Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1% |
5 | Flat sample of silicon with thick patterned oxide | Step height of patterned thick (10 µm) oxide on top of a silicon wafer. 7 µm deep pattern, trench width 6 µm |
Step height must be within ±3% of a SEM profile measurement. |
6 | Flat sample of silicon with thick layer of patterned polymer | Sample material: SU8 on silicon. Pillar heights of 69 µm with 25 µm between pillar edges |
Height 69±2 µm |
7 | Free standing structure | Measure bow due to stress of a membrane. Membrane material: Si(2 µm)/SiO2(~1 µm)/Au(50 nm) Membrane size: honey comb structure approximately 150 µm in diameter Bow < 500 nm |
Membrane bow repeatability of 5 successive measurement within 2% |
8 | Stitching of large area | Stitching 4 mm x 4 mm on same sample as in 7. The area consists of many closed packed honey comb formed membranes. | Membrane bow must the same as on 7 within 2% |
9 | Narrow trenches and holes | Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate 2.5 µm wide trench in silicon with a depth of 20 µm |
Depth 20±2 µm |
10 | Film thickness measurement of transparent thin film | Transparent thin film thickness of 28 nm SiO2 on Si | SiO2 thickness 28±1 nm |
11 | Measurements of multiple stacks | 120 nm nitride on 110 nm oxide on a silicon substrate | Within ±2% on each layer from an ellipsometer measurement. |
12 | Film thickness measurements of transparent films on small structure | Sample material: Si with 1.5 µm patterned AZ-resist Measure thickness of AZ-resist on pillars of 50 µm in diameter |
Within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement. |
13 | Roughness repeatability | Sample material: Si wafer with poly-silicon layer 3 successive measurements of the roughness |
Repeatability within 0.2% |
Results of acceptance test no. 1, 2 and 3
Sample material: Patterned silicon substrate
Measurement: Trench depth with aspect ratio 1:10, 1:11 and 1:13 on a 10µm, 8mm and 6.4µm wide trenches respectively
Acceptance criteria: Depth 100±2 µm, 91±2µm and 85±2µm. The SEM profile images of the three trenches are shown here:
Results
Test no. 1 was done in two ways:
- With confocal objective EPI 100x-N: See the results here
- With Interferometric objective 50X DI: See the results here
Test no. 2 was done using: confocal objective EPI 100x-N: See the results here
Test no. 3 was done using: confocal objective EPI 100x-N: See the results here
Settings for methode no. 1 for test no. 1, 2 and 3: confocal
Recipe: Trench
- Operation mode: trench
- + Raw smoothing confocal
- + fine shift
- Objective: EPI 100X-N
- Z scan
- Dual - bottom up
- top: 8µm
- Gap: 91µm (<- choose the trench depth)
- Bottom: 8µm
- Speed factor: 1x
- + Linear stage
- Dual - bottom up
- Threshold: 0.0%
- Light source
- Levels: 2
- 900 -> 60 (might need to be set a little different)
- Gain: default
- Levels: 2
Setting for methode no. 2 for test no. 1: interferometric
We do not have a recipe for that but we used:
- Objective: Interferometric 50x DI
- Z scan: VSI
- Light source: increased gain and contrast
Results of acceptance test no. 4
Sample material: Patterned flat sample of glass
Measurement: Depth of pattern
Standard profiler measurement:335 nm
Acceptance criteria:Depth within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement (331.65nm-338.35nm) and repeatability (3 successive measurements) within 0.1%
System settings:
Objective: DI 50x-N
VSI z scan: 10µm
Treshold: 1%
Average 4 images (to reduce noise)
Results
It was repeated 10 Time.
The first measurement is shown here
This table show the depth value for the 10 measurements
' | Measured depth [nm] | Repeated 20170925 with cover off | Repeated 20180816 after repair |
1 | 337.5 | 347.9 | 341.1 |
2 | 336.5 | 333.9 | 340.4 |
3 | 334.7 | 341.5 | 337.2 |
4 | 335.5 | 343.2 | 330.8 |
5 | 339.2 | 347.7 | 339.0 |
6 | 337.2 | 345.4 | 340.0 |
7 | 334.2 | 341.8 | 338.8 |
8 | 335.5 | 337.9 | 339.8 |
9 | 341.1 | 342.1 | 334.6 |
10 | 344.4 | 335.9 | 336.4 |
Average depth | 337.58 | 341.73 | 337.82 |
Repeatability | 3.0% (the bad repeatability was accepted due to the high noise level in the room) | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Results of acceptance test no. 5
Sample: Flat sample of silicon with thick patterned oxide (APOX).
Measurement: Step height of patterned thick (10 µm) oxide on top of a silicon wafer. The pattern is aprox. 7µm thick.
Acceptance criteria: Step height must be within ±3% of a SEM profile measurement. See the SEM profile here:
Settings:
- Recipe: Acceptance nr. 5 SMR
- Mode: default
- Objective: 50x-DI
- VSI Z scan 18.0µm
- Threshold 2%
- Note: Scan only in the APOX (not in the Si) or else the system will get confused.
See the result here:
Results of acceptance test no. 6
Sample: Flat sample of silicon with thick layer of patterned SU8.
Measure: step height.
Acceptance criteria: Height 69±2 µm
Settings:
- Recipe: Acceptance nr. 6 SMR
- Mode: application Acceptance 6
- Raw smoothing confocal
- Coarse shift single samle
- Reject multiple reflections
- Objective: Confocal EPI 20x-N
- Z scan range: 104µm
- Threshold: 2.0%
See the result here:
Results of acceptance test no. 7
Sample: Free standing structure. Membrane material: Si(2 µm)/SiO2(~1 µm)/Au(50 nm). Membrane size: honey comb structure approximately 150 µm in diameter
Measure: Measure bow due to stress of a membrane.
Acceptance criteria: Membrane bow repeatability of 5 successive measurement within 2%
The sample was not as we suspected. There was almost no bow. The membrane looked broken and it did not really make any sense to measure the bow.
Settings: Two different setting were tried out, the second was the most successful:
Setting no. 1:
- Objective: DI 50x-N
- PSI
- Threshold 2%
Setting no. 2:
- Objective: DI 50x-N
- Z scan: VSI 10µm
- Threshold: 1.0%
Result
The measurement we did are shown here:
Results of acceptance test no. 8
Measurement: Stitching 4 mm x 4 mm on same sample as in 7.
Sample: The area consists of many closed packed honey comb formed membranes
Acceptance criteria: Membrane bow must the same as on 7 within 2%
Settings:
- Extended topography
- Objective: DI 20x-N
- Z scan: VSI: 40µm
- Threshold: 1.0%
Result:
We made a stitched image of the hole membrane and repeated it two times. It looked much the same but as for test 7 it was hard to do any measurements on it. See the images and profiles in the result file:
Results of acceptance test no. 9
Sample: Patterned silicon substrate.
Measurement: Narrow trench depth
Acceptance criteria: 20±2µm, see the SEM images here:
Setting
Recipe: Narrow trench
- Operation mode: narrow trench
- Coarse shift single sampling
- Objective: EPI 100X-N
- Z scan:
- Dual - bottom up
- top: 4µm
- Gap: 20µm (the trench depth)
- Bottom: 4µm
- Dual - bottom up
- Speed factor: 1x
- Threshold: 0.0%
- Light source:
- Levels: 2
- 176 -> 30 (might need to be set a little different)
- Gain: default
Result
Results of acceptance test no. 10
Sample: Transparent thin film thickness of 28 nm SiO2 on Si
Measurement:Film thickness measurement of transparent thin film
Acceptance criteria: SiO2 thickness 28±1 nm
Settings
- Objective: EPI 20x-N
- Model: SiO2 thermal
Result
The result was 28.7nm
Results of acceptance test no. 11
Sample: 120 nm nitride on 110 nm oxide on a silicon substrate
Measurement: Measurements of multiple stacks
Acceptance criteria: Within ±2% on each layer from an ellipsometer measurement (SiO2: 112nm, Si3N4: 139nm)
Settings Model layers use:
- SiO2_(therm)
- Si3N4
Result
- SiO2: 113.1nm
- Si3N4: 136.9nm
Results of acceptance test no. 12
Sample: Si with 1.4 µm patterned AZ-resist on 50µm pillars
Measurement: Film thickness measurements of transparent films on small structure
Acceptance criteria: Within ±1% from a standard profiler measurement.
Settings
Used Models -> Others -> Cauchy
Options -> Roughness -> change amplitude fitting
Result
Within limits
Results of acceptance test no. 13
Sample: Si wafer with poly-silicon layer
Measurement: Roughness repeatability, 3 successive measurements of the roughness
Acceptance criteria: Repeatability within 0.2%
Note: Because the surface roughness of the sample was very low and the noise/vibration level too high we could not obtain the specified repeatability.
Result
- The surface roughness (Ra) was 0.5nm
- The repeatability over 10 measurements was 34%
- The maximum deviation in roughness was 0.2nm
Se the number in the file below: