June 2010 Survey: Difference between revisions

From LabAdviser
Ajoe (talk | contribs)
New page: <h2> Survey introduction </h2> The June 2010 survey was the third survey carried out using a format where individual cleanroom users were asked about their view on various parts of using ...
 
Fj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


The June 2010 survey was the third survey carried out using a format where individual cleanroom users were asked about their view on various parts of using DTU Danchip's facilities and in particular the cleanroom facilities. <br>
The June 2010 survey was the third survey carried out using a format where individual cleanroom users were asked about their view on various parts of using DTU Danchip's facilities and in particular the cleanroom facilities. <br>
The questionaire was send to <b> 137 </b> registered users (based on the logging of cleanroom use) unfortunately <b> 1 </b> of the e-mail adresses was obsolete and thus the mails bounced, which brought the total number of potential answers to <b> 136 </b>. In total <b> 23 </b> persons answered the questionaire which means an answer fraction of 17% regardless of whether or not the bounces should be included in the total). <br>
The questionaire was send to <b> 137 </b> registered users (based on the logging of cleanroom use) unfortunately <b> 1 </b> of the e-mail adresses was obsolete and thus the mails bounced, which brought the total number of potential answers to <b> 136 </b>. In total <b> 23 </b> persons answered the questionaire which means an answer fraction of 17% regardless of whether or not the bounces should be included in the total. <br>
This page deals with the comments given as part of the questionaire. Danchip values this feedback highly.
This page deals with the comments given as part of the questionaire. Danchip values this feedback highly.


Line 13: Line 13:
<h5> Har altid undret mig over hvorfor man får at vide at en maskine virker, men ikke får at vide når den er 'out of order'. Som udgangspunkt må man vel gå ud fra at maskinerne virker og at det derfor kun er nødvendigt at informere om afvigelser fra normal drift. </h5>
<h5> Har altid undret mig over hvorfor man får at vide at en maskine virker, men ikke får at vide når den er 'out of order'. Som udgangspunkt må man vel gå ud fra at maskinerne virker og at det derfor kun er nødvendigt at informere om afvigelser fra normal drift. </h5>


<i> Action:  </i> <br>
<i> Action: Vi er enige i, at brugerne bør orienteres pr. mail, når en maskine sættes "out of use" (dette vil blive implementeret til september). Vi vil fortsat orientere om "ready for use" pr. mail, når maskinen er klar til brug. </i> <br>
Danchip comments:


<br>
<br>
Line 36: Line 35:
<h5> It would still be an advantage if we can get a SEM outside of the cleanroom. The investigation of used samples/devices for e.g. failure analysis could be performed easily. </h5>
<h5> It would still be an advantage if we can get a SEM outside of the cleanroom. The investigation of used samples/devices for e.g. failure analysis could be performed easily. </h5>


<i> Action:  </i> <br>
<i> Action: We will very soon when Jonas is back from leave set-up the old JEOL-SEM in the basement of build. 346. </i> <br>
Danchip comments: FJ


<br>
<br>
Line 52: Line 50:
<h5> Det kunne være sjovt hvis vi fik adgang til dataen fra partikelmålingerne. Kan se de sender dataen til en server, så enten kunne man gå ind på en hjemmeside og se live data, ellers bare ligger dem op i labmanager/advisoren  </h5>
<h5> Det kunne være sjovt hvis vi fik adgang til dataen fra partikelmålingerne. Kan se de sender dataen til en server, så enten kunne man gå ind på en hjemmeside og se live data, ellers bare ligger dem op i labmanager/advisoren  </h5>


<i> Action: </i> <br>
<i> Action: We are not able to distribute "live data" - we do not have licence to do this. We will consider the possibility to distribute "historical data" periodically (e.g. weekly or monthly). </i> <br>
Danchip comments: EMH


<br>
<br>
Line 60: Line 57:
<h5> The day all of Danchip was away from campus the alarm went off, but no one from danchip came to count us at 358. You should at least leave behind an emergency team such that this does not happen again. </h5>
<h5> The day all of Danchip was away from campus the alarm went off, but no one from danchip came to count us at 358. You should at least leave behind an emergency team such that this does not happen again. </h5>


<i> Action: </i> <br>
<i> Action: We assume that this is about the incident on March 4 where we had a silane leak in service room 2. We have discussed the silane incident quite thoroughly in the Safety Committee and have implemented new procedures to avoid this kind of accident again. Regarding the absence of Danchips emergency team, we will re-evaluate and clarify the guidelines for this situation which basically is the same as when working outside normal working hours. This means that you in case of immediate evacuation should gather at the meeting point and wait for the fire brigade to arrive whereafter you contact the fire officer yourself.  </i> <br>
Danchip comments: FJ


<br>
<br>
Line 79: Line 75:
I often get the feeling that the Si-processing is always prioritised before the III-V. For example regarding the material on LabAdviser. It has been supplied to Danchip, but is not in LabAdviser. Another example was the generator of PECVD2 was connected by default to PECVD1 when the generator of PECVD1 was broken, although PECVD2 was the one which was most in use.  </h5>
I often get the feeling that the Si-processing is always prioritised before the III-V. For example regarding the material on LabAdviser. It has been supplied to Danchip, but is not in LabAdviser. Another example was the generator of PECVD2 was connected by default to PECVD1 when the generator of PECVD1 was broken, although PECVD2 was the one which was most in use.  </h5>


<i> Action: </i> <br>
<i> Action: We have recently agreed with Fotonik to take over the responsibility of the III-V process equipment which will be realized gradually during the last quarter of 2010. This will hopefully improve the situation since we during this take-over phase will gain more insight in the present status of the equipments.  </i> <br>
Danchip comments: FJ

Latest revision as of 10:18, 25 August 2010

Survey introduction

The June 2010 survey was the third survey carried out using a format where individual cleanroom users were asked about their view on various parts of using DTU Danchip's facilities and in particular the cleanroom facilities.
The questionaire was send to 137 registered users (based on the logging of cleanroom use) unfortunately 1 of the e-mail adresses was obsolete and thus the mails bounced, which brought the total number of potential answers to 136 . In total 23 persons answered the questionaire which means an answer fraction of 17% regardless of whether or not the bounces should be included in the total.
This page deals with the comments given as part of the questionaire. Danchip values this feedback highly.

Comments

The comments appear here as they were written in the feedback field of the questionaire. In a few cases they have been anonymized or the worst spelling mistakes corrected.



Comment 1

Har altid undret mig over hvorfor man får at vide at en maskine virker, men ikke får at vide når den er 'out of order'. Som udgangspunkt må man vel gå ud fra at maskinerne virker og at det derfor kun er nødvendigt at informere om afvigelser fra normal drift.

Action: Vi er enige i, at brugerne bør orienteres pr. mail, når en maskine sættes "out of use" (dette vil blive implementeret til september). Vi vil fortsat orientere om "ready for use" pr. mail, når maskinen er klar til brug.



Comment 2

Some label should be both in Danish and English, such as the labels on the buttons of fumehood and bath.

Action: We will investigate further and assure that there are english labels on all equipment
Danchip comments: Danchip, as an international working environment, must make information available so that every user can understand it. This means that all labels in our mind should at least be in english, with the possibility of additionally having danish labels.

Comment 3

It is good that the overall support for III-V things is increasing. This has been and still is unsatisfactory but the development right now seems very positive.

Action: A plan for full integration of III-V equipment into Danchips operation is being put in place right now.
Danchip comments: Thanks a lot for noticing that things have started changing. Danchip, with a lot of assistance from Kresten Yvind of DTU Fotonik is implementing a plan for full integration of the III-V equipment. The plan calls for all equipment being under 'Danchips wings' by the end of the year with a final discussion meeting with the involved users in january 2011.



Comment 4

It would still be an advantage if we can get a SEM outside of the cleanroom. The investigation of used samples/devices for e.g. failure analysis could be performed easily.

Action: We will very soon when Jonas is back from leave set-up the old JEOL-SEM in the basement of build. 346.



Comment 5

Real pleasure working with you all - great team.

Action: Smiling
Danchip comments: Thank you very much.



Comment 6

Det kunne være sjovt hvis vi fik adgang til dataen fra partikelmålingerne. Kan se de sender dataen til en server, så enten kunne man gå ind på en hjemmeside og se live data, ellers bare ligger dem op i labmanager/advisoren

Action: We are not able to distribute "live data" - we do not have licence to do this. We will consider the possibility to distribute "historical data" periodically (e.g. weekly or monthly).



Comment 7

The day all of Danchip was away from campus the alarm went off, but no one from danchip came to count us at 358. You should at least leave behind an emergency team such that this does not happen again.

Action: We assume that this is about the incident on March 4 where we had a silane leak in service room 2. We have discussed the silane incident quite thoroughly in the Safety Committee and have implemented new procedures to avoid this kind of accident again. Regarding the absence of Danchips emergency team, we will re-evaluate and clarify the guidelines for this situation which basically is the same as when working outside normal working hours. This means that you in case of immediate evacuation should gather at the meeting point and wait for the fire brigade to arrive whereafter you contact the fire officer yourself.



Comment 8

Performance of equipment
III-V aligner: there are vibrations that make it difficult to align.
III-V spinner: Some time ago there were problems with the vacuum and spin-speed. Seems to run better now.
PECVD2: The deposition rate has been varying as the generator has been switched to and from PECVD1 and PECVD2. It seems to be stable now.
III-V plasma asher: The pressure has been at 0.2 mbar for a long time but should go down to 0.1 (which is the lowest reading of the scale).
III-V ICP: Still not up and running properly!

Cleanroom conditions
I think that the general cleanliness in the cleanroom has been horrible up until recently. The cleanliness in the III-V room is also deteriorating although I try to keep it up. For example there seems to be many non III-V users of the spinner that are not aware of how to clean up after themselves and they are not aware of how to use the fumehoods or of how to dispose of tissues and solvent. The final performance of our devices is very much related to the general cleanliness.

Overall satisfaction
I often get the feeling that the Si-processing is always prioritised before the III-V. For example regarding the material on LabAdviser. It has been supplied to Danchip, but is not in LabAdviser. Another example was the generator of PECVD2 was connected by default to PECVD1 when the generator of PECVD1 was broken, although PECVD2 was the one which was most in use.

Action: We have recently agreed with Fotonik to take over the responsibility of the III-V process equipment which will be realized gradually during the last quarter of 2010. This will hopefully improve the situation since we during this take-over phase will gain more insight in the present status of the equipments.