Specific Process Knowledge/Back-end processing/Laser Micromachining Tool/Laser Micromachining Tool acceptance test

From LabAdviser
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Unless anything else is stated, everything on this page, text and pictures are made by DTU Nanolab.

These are results from the acceptance test of the machine in March 2012

Silicon straight line dice through

A single line is cut into the sample. The line may be realized by multiple passes, the line should be parallel with the flat of the test sample and must go all the way through the wafer. Time and quality of dice (chipping, cracking) will be evaluated.


Sample material : Silicon wafer 4" <100>, single side polished, thickness = 525µm


Acceptance criteria : Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf: <2

Laser setting :

  • IPG 1064nm, f= 255mm Objective. As of March 2020 the IPG laser is no longer available, and is replaced by the TB laser \ rkch

Results : Final kerf width = 212um. No chipping or cracking beyond that.

Time for cut: 38sec for 40 mm line.

Result acceptance test 2.2. Straight line dicing
Result acceptance test 2.2. Straight line dicing zoom


The test is accepted

Silicon two directions line dice through

Multiple lines are cut through the wafer. Line-to-line separation of lines parallel to the flat is, 20 mm (5 lines in parallel with flat), the first line parallel with the flat should lie 10 mm from the flat, line to line separation perpendicular to the flat must be 15 mm (7 lines) the first line perpendicular to the flat should be located 5 mm from the edge. Time and quality of dice (chipping, cracking) will be evaluated

Sample material : Silicon wafer 4" <100>, single side polished, thickness = 525µm

Acceptance criteria : Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf: <2

Laser setting :

  • IPG 1064nm, f= 255mm Objective. As of March 2020 the IPG laser is no longer available, and is replaced by the TB laser \ rkch

Results :

  • Final kerf width = ~200um.
  • Time for cut: 14 min
Result acceptance test 2.3

The test is accepted

Silica on silicon curved line dice through

Five curved lines are cut into the sample. Two of the curved lines are only cut through the silica top layer (“LQO”) of 10 µm ± 1 µm and two of the curved lines are cut through the top silica and the silicon bulk (“LQO” and “LSA”). The final line is cut through both silica layers and the bulk silicon (“LQO” + “LSA” + “LQB”). The total length of each line is less than 150 mm. Two wavelengths have been used, one for the silica (355nm) and the other one for the silicon (1064nm). The sample got an ultrasonic bath after processing.

Sample material : Silicon wafer 4" <100>, single side polished, thickness = 525µm, with a 10 µm ± 1 µm coating of thermally grown oxide on both sides.

Acceptance criteria :

  • Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf: <2
Samples Process time allowed (the processing time may deviate ± 25%) Process time measured Kerf widths
1. Only SiO2 cut (1 line) 85,28 sec 34 sec ~260µm
2. Only SiO2 cut (1 line) 85,28 sec 34 sec ~260µm
3. SiO2 +Si cut (1 line) 85.28 s + 305.66 s = 390.94 sec 34 sec + 154 sec = 188 sec SiO2: ~290um Si: ~200um
4. SiO2 +Si cut (1 line) 85.28 s + 305.66 s = 390.94 sec 34 sec + 154 sec = 188 sec SiO2: ~290um Si: ~200um
5. SiO2 +Si cut through 85.28 s + 611.32 s = 696.60 sec 34 sec + 253 sec = 287 sec 1st SiO2: ~310um Si: 220um

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 355nm, f= 255mm Objectives
  • Fuego 1064nm, f= 255mm Objectives

Results :

#1 corner
#1 kerf
#3 corner
#3 kerf
#5 corner
#5 kerf
#5 kerf from backside
#5 kerf backside with largest chipping
SEM view of the corner through the oxide only.
SEM view of the corner throuh the silicon.

Sample broke after cleaning in Ultrasonic bath at cut #5. Chipping < 200um.

Test is accepted

Quartz dicing straight lines

A single line is cut into the sample through centre and entire sample. The line may be realized by multiple passes, the line should be parallel with the flat of the test sample and should go all the way through the wafer.

Sample material : Quartz wafer 4" double side polished, thickness = 500 µm

Acceptance criteria :

Parameter Acceptance criteria Process value measured
Time for writting line <320 sec 78 sec
Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf < 2 0 (<30 µm)
Instances of cracking within 5 mm from edge 0 0

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 1064nm, f= 103mm Objective
  • Power : 72%


Results :

  • Short line on the top of the quartz wafer, not cutting the edges. The wafer broke during the cutting.
  • Entire line cut through centre and entire sample
SEM view of the trenche.
Magnification 10x - Short line, front side view
Magnification 10x - Entire line, front side view
Magnification 10x - Entire line, back side view

Test is accepted


Silicon hole drilling

Structures with 4 by 4 holes (5 mm spacing) are cut. The set of 16 holes should have a top diameter of 0.2 mm. The hole dimensions have been measured with a calibrated microscope.

Sample material : Silicon wafer 4" <100>, single side polished, thickness = 525µm

Acceptance criteria :

Parameter Acceptance criteria Process value measured
Time per hole (200 µm) <35 sec 10 sec
Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf < 2 0
Number of through holes in set (0,2mm top diameter holes) 16 16
Average hole diameter on top of wafer for set 2 (0,2mm nominally top diameter) 0.195 mm to 0.205 mm 195 um
Average hole diameter on bottom of wafer for set 2 (0,03 mm nominally top diameter) 0.025 mm to 0.035 mm 150 um

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 1064nm, f= 103mm Objective


Results :

Front side view of the hole
Back side view of the hole
SEM view of the hole

Test is accepted

Borosilicate glass hole drilling

Structures with 4 by 4 holes (5 mm spacing) are cut. The set of 16 holes should have a top diameter of 0.2 mm. The hole dimensions have been measured with a calibrated microscope.

Sample material : Silicon wafer 4" <100>, single side polished, thickness = 525µm

Acceptance criteria :

Parameter Acceptance criteria Process value measured
Time per hole (200 µm) < 45 sec 44,75 sec
Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf < 2 0 (front)
Number of through holes in set (0,2mm top diameter holes) 16 16
Average hole diameter on top of wafer for set 2 (0,2mm nominally top diameter) 0.195 mm to 0.205 mm 199 um
Average hole diameter on bottom of wafer for set 2 (0,03 mm nominally top diameter) 0.025 mm to 0.035 mm 107 um

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 355nm, f= 103mm Objective


Results :

Front side view of the drillied hole
Back side view of the drilled hole
SEM view of the drilled hole

Test is accepted


Stainless steel - thick sample - drilling hole

Array (10x10) of holes with a diameter of 0.1 mm and a pitch of 0.5 mm

Sample material : Stainless steel foil with a thickness of 0.5 mm

Acceptance criteria :

Parameter Acceptance criteria Process value measured
Time per hole max 40 sec/hole 9,6 sec
Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf < 2 0
Number of through holes in set (0,1mm top diameter holes) 10x10 10x10
Average hole diameter on top of foil (0,1mm nominally top diameter) 0.09 mm to 0.11 mm 100 um
Average hole diameter on bottom of foil Because no helical drilling head is used, an exact estimation of the average hole diameter on the bottom of the foil cannot be made

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 1064nm, f= 103mm Objective


Results :

Front side view of the drilling hole. Radius : 51,41µm
Back side view of the drilling hole. Radius : 30,87µm
Front side view of the drilling hole. Radius : 49,01µm
Back side view of the drilling hole. Radius : 32,54µm

Test is accepted


Stainless steel - drilling small holes

Array (50x50) of holes with a diameter of 0.035 mm and a pitch of 0.05 mm

Sample material : Stainless steel foil with a thickness of 0.08 mm

Acceptance criteria :

Parameter Acceptance criteria Process value measured
Time per hole min 10 holes/ min 71.5 holes/ min
Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf < 2 0
Number of through holes in set (0,1mm top diameter holes) 50 x 50 50 x 50
Average hole diameter on top of foil (0.035 mm nominally top diameter) 0.035 mm ± 0.005 32 um
Average hole diameter on the bottom of foil (0.01 mm nominally bottom diameter) 0.01 mm ± 0.005 16 um

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 1064nm, f= 103mm Objective


Results :

Hole diameter set in VBscrip (black). Spot size (red). Final diameter (blue)
Radius set in VBscript Radius measured
0,0025mm ~25µm
0,004mm ~24µm
0,005mm ~28µm
0,006mm ~29µm
0,01mm ~32µm


Front side view of the drilling hole. Magnification 20x. Radius : 0,0025mm
Front side view of the drilling hole. Magnification 20x. Radius : 0,01mm
Backside view of the drilling hole. Magnification 20x. Radius : 0,01mm

Test is accepted

Nickel - cutting curves

A single closed non- circular line with a path length of 270 mm is cut through the shim

Sample material : Nickel shim 180 mm diameter, 300 µm thickness

Acceptance criteria :

Parameter Acceptance criteria Process value measured
Time for writing line max 7 min 6:30 min
Instances of chipping beyond 0.2 mm from kerf < 2 0
Line width < 500 µm 165 um
Average hole diameter on top of foil (0.035 mm nominally top diameter) 0.035 mm ± 0.005 32 um

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 1064nm, f= 255mm Objective


Results :

Magnification 5x

Test is accepted


Nickel - micromachining

Machines 4-sided pyramidal recesses in nickel to a depth of 100 µm and a pyramid side width 0f 200 µm

Sample material : Nickel shim 85 mm diameter, 300 µm thickness

Acceptance criteria :

Parameter Acceptance criteria Process value measured
Time for writing recess max 2 min 17 sec
Center depth of recess (nominally 100 µm) 80 µm to 120 µm 95 um
Side width (nominally 200 µm) 180 µm to 220 µm 206 um

Laser settings :

  • Fuego 355nm, f= 103mm Objective

Results :

Result acceptance test 2.11. Array of pyramides
Result acceptance test 2.11. Zoom on pyramide
Result acceptance test 2.11. Result from optical profiler


Test is accepted