Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/AOE (Advanced Oxide Etch): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*[[/Quartz etch using AOE|Quartz etch using AOE]] | *[[/Quartz etch using AOE|Quartz etch using AOE]] | ||
*[[/Silicon Nitride Etch using AOE|Silicon Nitride Etch using AOE]] | *[[/Silicon Nitride Etch using AOE|Silicon Nitride Etch using AOE]] | ||
===Limitations using the AOE=== | ===Limitations using the AOE=== |
Revision as of 07:34, 31 May 2012
Etching using the dry etch technique AOE (Advanced oxide etch)
The AOE can be used for etching silicon oxide, silicon (oxy)nitride and quartz. Look in the manuals for the AOE to see how to operate the machine (you can find the manuals in LabManager on the AOE page).
Currently all training on the AOE should be agreed with Berit Geilman Herstrøm. For training requests e-mail to training@danchip.dtu.dk
Process information
- Etch of Silicon Oxide using AOE
- Si mask etch using AOE
- Remove resist in the AOE
- Quartz etch using AOE
- Silicon Nitride Etch using AOE
Limitations using the AOE
Wafer bow
There is a limit to how much the wafer can bow and still be clamped on the chuck. The limit can maybe vary a little over time and may also depend on the material on the backside of the substrate. On a 100mm Si wafer with SiO2 on the backside (<10µm) we expect the limit to be around 50µm bow (when the back side surface is convex).
I have been able to etch much deeper in SiO2 with a P-Si mask than with a photo resist mask on a wafer with 50% load. When using photoresist the wafer stopped clamping during the etch after just a few µm. With P-Si can could etch 15µm without problems. I expect this to be due to a combination of P-Si on the back side clamping much better and P-Si on the back side helping to reduce the bow.
Transparent wafers
Transparent wafers are a challange for two reasons. 1. In the load lock the LASER detection system that is used to detect the wafer during mapping cannot detect a completely transparent wafer. 2. A transparent wafer is either quartz or fused silicon. These materials are very difficult to clamp electrostatically and will therefore not be able to pass the He leak up test succesfully.
- The first issue may be overcome by using a non-transparent masking material or adding a non-transparent material on the back side of the wafer (could be aluminium).
- The second issue may be overcome by reducing the He back side pressure or reducing the He back side cooling completely. Another way to solve it is to either bond the transparent wafer to a silicon wafer before transfering it into chamber or deposite a more conducting layer on the backside of the wafer. This could be aluminium but also 1-2µm P-Si may be enough.
Purpose | Dry etch of |
|
---|---|---|
Performance | Etch rates |
~0.2-0.6 µm/min |
Anisotropy |
| |
Process parameter range | Process pressure |
|
Gas flows |
| |
Substrates | Batch size |
|
Substrate material allowed |
| |
Possible masking material |
|