Specific Process Knowledge/Etch/AOE (Advanced Oxide Etch): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Category: Etch (Dry) Equipment|AOE]] | [[Category: Etch (Dry) Equipment|AOE]] | ||
{{CC1}} | |||
== Etching using the dry etch technique AOE (Advanced oxide etch) == | == Etching using the dry etch technique AOE (Advanced oxide etch) == | ||
[[Image:AOE.jpg|300x300px|thumb|AOE: positioned in cleanroom B-1, | [[Image:AOE.jpg|300x300px|thumb|AOE: positioned in cleanroom B-1, {{photo1}}]] | ||
Name: M/PLEX ICP - AOE (Advanced Oxide Etcher) <br> | Name: M/PLEX ICP - AOE (Advanced Oxide Etcher) <br> | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
====Transparent wafers==== | ====Transparent wafers==== | ||
Transparent wafers are a | Transparent wafers are a challenge for two reasons. 1. In the load lock the LASER detection system that is used to detect the wafer during mapping cannot detect a completely transparent wafer. 2. A transparent wafer is either quartz or fused silicon. These materials are very difficult to clamp electrostatically and will therefore not be able to pass the He leak up test successfully. | ||
# The first issue may be overcome by using a non-transparent masking material or adding a non-transparent material on the back side of the wafer | # The first issue may be overcome by using a non-transparent masking material or adding a non-transparent material on the back side of the wafer | ||
#The second issue may be overcome by reducing the He back side pressure or reducing the He back side cooling completely. Another way to solve it is to either bond the transparent wafer to a silicon wafer before | #The second issue may be overcome by reducing the He back side pressure or reducing the He back side cooling completely. Another way to solve it is to either bond the transparent wafer to a silicon wafer before transferring it into chamber or deposit a more conducting/semiconducting layer on the backside of the wafer (could be silicon, maybe Chromium, please ask). 1-2µm P-Si may be enough, maybe even less. | ||
==An overview of the performance of AOE and some process related parameters== | ==An overview of the performance of AOE and some process related parameters== |
Latest revision as of 10:38, 3 February 2023
Feedback to this page: click here
Unless otherwise stated, this page is written by DTU Nanolab internal
Etching using the dry etch technique AOE (Advanced oxide etch)
Name: M/PLEX ICP - AOE (Advanced Oxide Etcher)
Vendor: STS (now SPTS)
The AOE can be used for dry etching silicon oxide, silicon (oxy) nitride and quartz. Look in the manuals for the AOE to see how to operate the machine (you can find the manuals in LabManager on the AOE page).
The user manual, quality control procedure and results, user APV, technical information and contact information can be found in LabManager:
AOE in LabManager - requires login
Process information
- Etch of Silicon Oxide
- Etch of Si
- Remove/etch resist/barc
- Etch of Fused Silica
- Etch of Quartz - special very thick samples
- Etch of Silicon Nitride
Limitations using the AOE
Wafer bow
There is a limit to how much the wafer can bow and still be clamped on the chuck. The limit can maybe vary a little over time and may also depend on the material on the backside of the substrate. On a 100mm Si wafer with SiO2 on the backside (<10µm) we expect the limit to be around 50µm bow (when the back side surface is convex).
A bow will be created when etching the top oxide layer on a wafer with oxide on both sides. For a larger etch load the bow will be more severe for a specific etch depth when for a smaller etch load. I have been able to etch much deeper in SiO2 with a P-Si mask than with a photo resist mask on a wafer with 50% load. When using photoresist the wafer stopped clamping during the etch after just a few µm. With P-Si I could etch 15µm without problems. I expect this to be due to a combination of P-Si on the back side clamping much better and P-Si on the back side helping to reduce the bow.
Transparent wafers
Transparent wafers are a challenge for two reasons. 1. In the load lock the LASER detection system that is used to detect the wafer during mapping cannot detect a completely transparent wafer. 2. A transparent wafer is either quartz or fused silicon. These materials are very difficult to clamp electrostatically and will therefore not be able to pass the He leak up test successfully.
- The first issue may be overcome by using a non-transparent masking material or adding a non-transparent material on the back side of the wafer
- The second issue may be overcome by reducing the He back side pressure or reducing the He back side cooling completely. Another way to solve it is to either bond the transparent wafer to a silicon wafer before transferring it into chamber or deposit a more conducting/semiconducting layer on the backside of the wafer (could be silicon, maybe Chromium, please ask). 1-2µm P-Si may be enough, maybe even less.
Purpose | Dry etch of |
|
---|---|---|
Performance | Etch rates |
~0.05-0.6 µm/min |
Anisotropy |
| |
Process parameter range | Process pressure |
|
Process power |
| |
Platen temperature |
| |
Gas flows |
| |
Substrates | Batch size |
|
Substrate material allowed |
| |
Possible masking material |
|